Archive for ‘Asia / Asie’

13 December, 2017

The Popery and Jesuitism Reference Library (torrent file)

How to download this 16.48GB worth of PDF books library?

  1. run a BitTorrent client.
    Be cautious of Proprietary and Freeware clients which track and spy on you, as opposed to Open Source ones that are more likely to be cleaner.
    You can download some BitTorrent clients that do not require install from https://portableapps.com/apps.
  2. Copy-paste the magnet hash (a code that will be understood by the client and enable the downloading of this huge library) 62710b5bf2105d2709ab4e23c91df4f71221342f into your BitTorrent client as follow

    or, if your BitTorrent client is associated with magnet links click on magnet:?xt=urn:btih:62710b5bf2105d2709ab4e23c91df4f71221342f&dn=… to automatically start downloading.

The Popery and Jesuitism Reference Library content list (click here if you prefer a list in PDF format):

Disc 1\911 Knights of Malta.pdf
Disc 1\A Brief Report of the Debates in the Anti-masonic Con.-1830.pdf
Disc 1\A Candid History of the Jesuits-Joseph McCabe-1913.pdf
Disc 1\A Catalogue of Notable Middle Templars-John Hutchinson-1902.pdf
Disc 1\A Catalogue of the Collection of Tracts for and Against Popery-Chetham Library-Thomas Jones-1851.pdf
Disc 1\A Charge Delivered to the Clergy at Exeter-Henry Phillpotts-1842.pdf
Disc 1\A Church History-Christopher Wordsworth-1883.pdf
Disc 1\A Confutation of Popery in III Parts-Thomas Bennet-1728.pdf
Disc 1\A Critical Dictionary of English Literature-American & British Authors-Samuel Austin Alibone.pdf
Disc 1\A General History of Freemasonry in Europe-Emanuel Rebold-Joseph Fletcher Brennan-1869.pdf
Disc 1\A Glimpse of the Great Secret Society-Louis-Rene de Caradeuc de La Chalotais-1872.pdf
Disc 1\A History of England From the Conclusion of The Great War in 1815-Spencer Walpole–1912.pdf
Disc 1\A History of Monachism and Nunhood-The Papal Garrison-1871.pdf
Disc 1\A History of Popery-Samuel Miller-1834.pdf
Disc 1\A History of Spain-Charles Edward Chapman and Rafael Altamira-1918.pdf
Disc 1\A History of the Ancient Chapel of Birch-John Booker-1859.pdf
Disc 1\A History of the Christian Church-Middle Age-Charles Hardwick-1877.pdf
Disc 1\A History of the Councils of the Church-Charles Joseph Hefele-William Robinson -1883.pdf
Disc 1\A History of the Gunpowder Plot-Phillip Sydney-1901.pdf
Disc 1\A History of the Gunpowder Plot-Phillip Sydney-1904 Edition.pdf
Disc 1\A History of the Inquisition of Spain-H. Charles Lea-1907.pdf
Disc 1\A History of the Jesuits-John Poynder-Charles Robert Dallas-1816.pdf
Disc 1\A Letter From a Blacksmith to the Elders of the Church of Scotland-John Whitherspoon-1828.pdf
Disc 1\A Letter to the Electors, Upon the Catholic Question-Sydney Smith-1826.pdf
Disc 1\A Narrative of the Mission to Orissa-Amos Sutton- Free Will Baptists-1833.pdf
Disc 1\A Nun Makes Terrible Disclosure-Marie Monk-1836.pdf
Disc 1\A Partial List of the Books in Its Library Relating to Ohio-1893.pdf
Disc 1\A Plain View of the Claims of the Orthodox Catholic-J. Joseph Overbeck-1881.pdf
Disc 1\A Plea for the West-Lyman Beecher 1835.pdf
Disc 1\A Practical Treatise of the Laws Relating to the Clergy-Archibald John Stephens-1848.pdf
Disc 1\A Preservative Against Popery-Edmund Gibson-John Cumming-1848.pdf
Disc 1\A Protestant Dictionary-Charles Henry Hamilton Wright-1904.pdf
Disc 1\A Recantation Sermon Against the Errors-William Aylmer-1713.pdf
Disc 1\A Ritual of Freemasonry-Avery Allyn-1853.pdf
Disc 1\A Select Library of Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers-Phillip Schaff-Henry Wace-1908.pdf
Disc 1\A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene-Phillip Schaff-Henry Wace-1905.pdf
Disc 1\A Short Critical Review of the Political Life of Oliver Cromwell-John Bancks-1760.pdf
Disc 1\A Short History of Christianity-Salomon Peinach-Florence Simmonds-1922.pdf
Disc 1\A Short History of the Catholic Church-Herman Wedewer-Joseph McSorley-1916.pdf
Disc 1\A Synopsis of the Moral Theology of the Church of Rome-Alfonso Maria de’Ligouri-1836.pdf
Disc 1\A System of Christian Doctrine-Isak August Dorner-1882.pdf
Disc 1\A Treatise of the Corruptions of Scripture-Thomas James-John Edmund Cox 1843.pdf
Disc 1\A Treatise on Church Government-Robert Barclay-1830.pdf
Disc 1\A Treatise on Man-William Hooper-1810.pdf
Disc 1\A Year Among the English Jesuits-Andrew Steinmetz-1846.pdf
Disc 1\Alberto.pdf
Disc 1\American Church Review-1873.pdf
Disc 1\American Journal of Education(Jesuit Schools) 1855-1882.pdf
Disc 1\American Tracts-Channing-1827.pdf
Disc 1\Americans Warned of Jesuitism-John Claudius Pitrat-1855.pdf
Disc 1\An Account of the Destruction of the Jesuits in France-Jean Le Rond d’Alembert-1776.pdf
Disc 1\An Answer to a Popish Book-Lewis Atterbury-Cornelius Nary-1871.pdf
Disc 1\An Ecclesiastical History Ancient & Modern-John Lawrence Mosheim-1824.pdf
Disc 1\An Encyclopdia of Freemasonry and Its Kindred Sciences-Albert Gatalin Mackey-1879.pdf
Disc 1\An Essay on Apostolical Succession-Thomas Powell-1846.pdf
Disc 1\An Essay on Crimes and Punishments-Casare Beccaria Voltaire-1872.pdf
Disc 1\An Historical and Critical Account of the Life of Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector-William Harris-1762.pdf
Disc 1\Ancient Christianity and the Doctrines of the Oxford Tracts For the Times-Issac Taylor-1844.pdf
Disc 1\Ancient Faiths and Modern-Thomas Inman-2004.pdf
Disc 1\Anti Popery Unreasonable or Unscriptural-John Rogers 1841.pdf
Disc 1\Anti Popery-Antonio Gavin-1833.pdf
Disc 1\Antidote to the Poison of Popery-Jacob Jones Janeway 1856.pdf
Disc 1\Appletons Annual Cyclopaedia and Registry of Important Events-1901.pdf
Disc 1\Appleton’s Cyclopedia of American Biography-James Grant Wilson-John Fiske-1888.pdf
Disc 1\Archbishop Ussher’s Answer to a Jesuit-James Ussher-1888.pdf
Disc 1\Arminianism-Another Gospel by William MacLean-1965.pdf
Disc 1\Authentic Memoirs Concerning the Portuguese Inquisition-Archibald Bowers-1761.pdf
Disc 1\Autobiography Correspondence-Lyman Beecher-1865.pdf
Disc 1\Beecher and His Accusers-Francis P. Williamson-1874.pdf
Disc 1\Behind the Dictators -L.H. Lehman-1942.pdf
Disc 1\Biblical Repository and Classical Review—ABR-1841.pdf
Disc 1\Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine-1844.pdf
Disc 1\Catholic Bibles Expose’.pdf
Disc 1\Catholic Controversy-A Reply to Dr Littledale-Ignatius Ryder-Richard Frederick Littledale-1881.pdf
Disc 1\Cavour and Garibaldi-1861.pdf
Disc 1\Celebrated Jesuits-Rev.William Harris Rule-1852.pdf
Disc 1\Christian Dogmatics-Hans Martensen-William Urwick-1898.pdf
Disc 1\Christian Dogmatics-Johanass Jacobus Oosterzee-1874.pdf
Disc 1\Christianity Compared With Popery-J. Eggleston-1848.pdf
Disc 1\Church History-John Heinrich Kurtz-John Macpherson-1890.pdf
Disc 1\Church of England Quarterly Review-1852.pdf
Disc 1\Collected Essays and Reviews of Thomas G. Law-1904.pdf
Disc 1\Collection of Controversial Discourses by Hickes and a Popish Priest-George Hickes-1727.pdf
Disc 1\Collection of Judgments of the Judicial Comm of the Privy Council-George Charles Brodrick-1865.pdf
Disc 1\Collection of State Trials ForTreason-Thomas Bayly Howell-1816.pdf
Disc 1\Columbian Cyclopedia-1879.pdf
Disc 1\Commentary on the Holy Scriptures-Johann Peter Lange-Phillip Schaff-1871.pdf
Disc 1\Commentary Upon the Whole Epistle of Ephesians-Paul Bayne-1896.pdf
Disc 1\Complete Works of Rev. Thomas Smyth D.D.-1908.pdf
Disc 1\Concerning Jesuits-Edited by John Gerard-1902.pdf
Disc 1\Convent Revealed-Peterson.pdf
Disc 1\Correspondence of J. H. Newman With J. Keble-1839 to 1845-1917.pdf
Disc 1\Correspondence on Infallability Between Gen. Alexander Kireeff & Jesuit-1896.pdf
Disc 1\Crimes of Our Times by L. R. Shelton-1923-2003.pdf
Disc 1\Critical Review of Theological Philosophy-Stewart Dingwall Fordyce Salmomd-1894.pdf
Disc 1\Curiosities of Literature-Rufus W. Griswold-1857.pdf
Disc 1\Cyclopaedia of Biblical Theological Literature-John McClintok-1889.pdf
Disc 1\Dark Deeds of the Papacy-Dawson Massy-1851.pdf
Disc 1\Dealings With the Inquisition of Papal Rome-Achille-1851.pdf
Disc 1\Dealings With the Inquisition-Giacinto Achilli-1851-Ver. 2.pdf
Disc 1\Delineation of Roman Catholicism-Charles Elliott-1851.pdf
Disc 1\Dialogues on Popery-Jacob Stanley-1836.pdf
Disc 1\Diary of Thomas Burton, Esq-Member in the Parliaments of Oliver and Richard Cromwell-1828.pdf
Disc 1\Dictionary-Christian Biography-Lit-Sects-Doctrines-William George Smith-Henry Wace-1877.pdf
Disc 1\Discourses and Dissertations on the Scriptural Doctrines of Atonement-Magee-1825.pdf
Disc 1\Discourses Reviews and Miscellanies-William Channing-1830.pdf
Disc 1\Disscusions on Church Priniciples Popish,Eratian,Presbytarian-William Cunningham-James Buchanan-1863.pdf
Disc 1\Doctrine of the Jesuits-Paul-Jean Pierre Bert-Gury-Pierre Rousselot-1880.pdf
Disc 1\Dodd’s Church History of England-1859.pdf
Disc 1\Double Cross.pdf
Disc 1\Ecclesiastical Reminiscences of the United States-Edward Waylen-1846.pdf
Disc 1\Ecclesiastical Republicanism-Thomas Smyth 1843.pdf
Disc 1\Encyclopedia of Philosophy.pdf
Disc 1\Engineer Corps of Hell-Chiniquy.pdf
Disc 1\Essay on Apostolical Succession-Thomas Powell-1840.pdf
Disc 1\Essays Lectures Upon Topics in Revealed Theology-Nathaniel William Taylor-1859.pdf
Disc 1\European Civilization-Protestantism vs. Catholicity-Jaime Luciano Balmes-1859.pdf
Disc 1\Evangelical Christendom-Vol. 5-Evangelical Alliance-1851.pdf
Disc 1\Familiar Letters to Bishop Fitzpatrick-John Bernard Fitzpatrick-1854.pdf
Disc 1\Five Problems of State and Religion-W.C. Wood-1877.pdf
Disc 1\Footprints of the Jesuits-Chapter 10-PARAGUAY-R.W. Thompson-1894.pdf
Disc 1\Footprints of The Jesuits-R.W. Thompson-1894.pdf
Disc 1\Foreign Conspiracy ofJesuit Terrorists-Samuel B. Miorse-1835.pdf
Disc 1\Fourteen Years a Jesuit-Paul Hoensbroech-1911.pdf
Disc 1\Glen Tilloch-John Pratt-1845.pdf
Disc 1\God in the Bible, With Preludes and Other Addresses on Leading Reforms-Joseph Cook-1889.pdf
Disc 1\Good Words-Norman and Donald Macleod-1886.pdf
Disc 1\Hapsburg Restoration by Vatican.pdf
Disc 1\Harpers Magazine The Building of America-1869.pdf
Disc 1\Her Majesty’s Tower-William Heoworth Dixon-1869.pdf
Disc 1\Hidden Works of Darkness Or the Doings of the Jesuits-W. Osburn-1846.pdf
Disc 1\Historic Notebook-Ebenezer Cobham Brewer-1892.pdf
Disc 1\Historical Scenes From the Old Jesuit Missions-William Ingram Kip-1875.pdf
Disc 1\Historical Sketch of the Conflicts Between Jesuits and Seculars-Thomas Graves Law-Cristopher Bragshaw-1889.pdf
Disc 1\Historical_Memoirs of the English Irish Catholics-Charles Butler-1822.pdf
Disc 1\History of Auricular Confession-Indulgences in Latin Church-Henry Charles Lea-1896.pdf
Disc 1\History of Christian Doctrine-Henry Clay Sheldon-1886.pdf
Disc 1\History of England From Wolsey to Spanish Armada-James Anthony Froude-1875.pdf
Disc 1\History of England- To the Death of Elizabeth-James Anthony Froude-1881.pdf
Disc 1\History of England-Frederick York Powell-Thomas Frederick Tout-1908.pdf
Disc 1\History of France-Jules Michelet-1847.pdf
Disc 1\History of France-Jules Michelet-G.H. Smith-1845.pdf
Disc 1\History of German Struggle for Liberty-Poultney Bigelow-1905.pdf
Disc 1\History of Protestantism-J. A. Wylie-1878.pdf
Disc 1\History of Romanism- Rev. John Dowling-1845.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Assassins-Trans. by O.C. Woods-Joseph Hammer-1835.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Christian Church-George Park Fisher-1887.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Church of England-Rev. A.H. Hore-1898.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Church-Its First Estate to Out Times-Jodocus Adolph Birkhauser-1898.pdf
Disc 1\History of the French Revolution-C.L. James-1902.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Inquisition-William Harris Rule-1874.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Jesuits in England 1580-1773-Taunton-1901.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Jesuits Plans, Designs-Giovanni Nicolini-1854.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Jesuits-Andrew Steinmetz-1848.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Jews in Russia and Poland, from the Earliest Times Until the Present Day-Simon Dubnow-Israel Friedlaender-1916.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Policy of the Church of Rome in Ireland-William Phelan-John Jebbs-James Lord-1854.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Reformation of the 16th Century-Merle D’Aubigne-1858.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Romeward Movement in Church of England-Walter Walsh-1900.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Scottish Nation-Vol.1-Wylie-1886.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Scottish Nation-Vol.2-Wylie-1886.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Scottish Nation-Vol.3-Wylie-1886.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Society of Jesus in North America-Thomas Aloysius Hughs-1908.pdf
Disc 1\History of the Thirty Years’ War-Schiller-.pdf
Disc 1\History of the United Netherlands-John Lothrop Motley-1861.pdf
Disc 1\Household Guest-1880.pdf
Disc 1\Identity of the Festivals of Rome & Babylon.pdf
Disc 1\Illustrations of Popery-J.P. Calender-1838.pdf
Disc 1\Independent Council-Roma of Serbia.pdf
Disc 1\Index to the British Catalogue of Books-Samson Low-1853.pdf
Disc 1\Institutes of the Christian Religion-John Calvin-1921 Ed..pdf
Disc 1\Interview of Eric Jon Phelps by Rick Martin.pdf
Disc 1\Ireland Under the Tudors-Richard Bagwell-1885.pdf
Disc 1\Irish Wits and Worthies-William Fitzpatrick-1873.pdf
Disc 1\Isis-Unveiled-Hellana Petrova Blavatsky-1891.pdf
Disc 1\Jesuit Juggling and Frauds-Richard Baxter-1835.pdf
Disc 1\Jesuit Relations and Allied Document-Reuben Gold Thwaites-1899.pdf
Disc 1\Jesuits and Jesuitism-Jules Michelet-1846.pdf
Disc 1\Jesuits in the History of India-.pdf
Disc 1\Joseph II and His Court-Historical Novel-Luis Muhlbach-Adelaide Chaudron-1867.pdf
Disc 1\Lavoro Receipt Copy of Serbian Loot at Vatican Bank-1945.pdf
Disc 1\Lawlessness, Sacerdotalism, and Ritualism, Discussed in Six Letters-Malcolm MacColl-1875.pdf
Disc 1\Lectures on Popery-The Mystery of Babylon-John Sympson Sergrove-1823.pdf
Disc 1\Letters in the Roman Catholic Controversy-William Brownlee-1834.pdf
Disc 1\Letters Speeches and Tracts on Irish Affairs-Edmund Burke-Mathew Arnold-1881.pdf
Disc 1\Letters to a Prebendary-John Milner-1810.pdf
Disc 1\Letters to His Holiness Pope Pius X-William Sullivan-1911.pdf
Disc 1\Life of Edward Bouverie Pusey-Henry Parry Liddon-1893.pdf
Disc 1\Literary and Theological Review of Plea For the West-Leonard Woods-Charles D. Pigeon-1835.pdf
Disc 1\Loyola and the Educational System of the Jesuits-Thomas Hughs-1892.pdf
Disc 1\Lutheran Theological Quarterly-1911.pdf
Disc 1\Macphail’s Edinburgh Ecclesiastical Journal and Literary Review-1851.pdf
Disc 1\Manual of Universal Church History-1892.pdf
Disc 1\Maria Monk-Mysteries of a Convent.pdf
Disc 1\Massacres of the South-Alexandre Dumas.pdf
Disc 1\Master Key to Popery-Anthony Antonio Gavin-1812.pdf
Disc 1\Memoirs of Queen Anne-Gibson-Boyer 1729.pdf
Disc 1\Memoirs of the Court Aristocracy and Diplomacy-Vehes-Demmler-1856.pdf
Disc 1\Memoirs of the Life and Times of Daniel De Foe-Walter Wilson-1830.pdf
Disc 1\Memoirs of the Life and Writings of the Rev. A.M. Toplady-Toplady-William Winters-1872.pdf
Disc 1\Memorials of the Life and Works of Thomas Fuller-Tozer Russell-1844.pdf
Disc 1\More Awful Disclosures-Dialogue Between a Schismatic Armenian-Romish-Priest and an Orthodox Catholic-1849.pdf
Disc 1\Mornings Among the Jesuits at Rome-Rev. Hobart Seymore-1850.pdf
Disc 1\Mother T’s Millions-Wullenweber-1998.pdf
Disc 1\My Battle for Life-David George Goyder-1857.pdf
Disc 1\No Friend Of Democracy-Edith Moore-1941.pdf
Disc 1\Observations on a Work by Mr Bickerstet-William Brudnll Barter-1836.pdf
Disc 1\Old Yorkshire-William Smith-1889.pdf
Disc 1\Oliver Cromwell Hhis Life Times Battlefields-Edwin Paxton Hood-1874.pdf
Disc 1\On Some Popular Errors Concerning Polititics & Religion-Lord Montagu-1874.pdf
Disc 1\Outlines_of_Church_History-Rudolf Sohm-May Sinclair-1909.pdf
Disc 1\Oxford Dictionary of Quotations.pdf
Disc 1\Papists Protesting Against Protestants-John Gother-Heny Hills-1686.pdf
Disc 1\Pascal and the Port Royalists-William Clark-1902.pdf
Disc 1\Pascal-John & Principal Tulloch-1879.pdf
Disc 1\Personal Reminiscences of Lyman Beecher- James White-1882.pdf
Disc 1\Plain Reasons Against Joining the Church of Rome-Richard Frederick Littledale-1886.pdf
Disc 1\Poor Mans Preservative-Joseph Blanco White-1825.pdf
Disc 1\Pope Or President-R.L.Delisser-1859.pdf
Disc 1\Popery and Infidelity-Douglas of Cavers-1853.pdf
Disc 1\Popery and the Popish Question-George Croly 1825.pdf
Disc 1\Popery and the United States-Rufus Wheelwright Clark 1841.pdf
Disc 1\Popery as it Was and as it Is-William Hogan-1854.pdf
Disc 1\Popery Exposed-Petruccelli Della Gattina 1895.pdf
Disc 1\Popery in Alliance with Heathenism-John Poynder 1835.pdf
Disc 1\Popery in Power-Joseph Turnley-1850.pdf
Disc 1\Popery Not Founded on Scripture, The Texts Which Papists Cite Out of the Bible-Thomas Tenison-1688.pdf
Disc 1\Popery Stripped of Its Garb-James M. Horner-1836.pdf
Disc 1\Popery, Its Character and Its Crimes-William Elfe Tayler-1847.pdf
Disc 1\Popery, Puseyism, Jesuitism-Descantis-1905.pdf
Disc 1\Popes and Jesuits of the Present Century-Edward Henry Michelsen-1860.pdf
Disc 1\Popish Infallibility Letters to Viscount Feilding on His Secession From the Church of England-Charles Hastings Collette-1850.pdf
Disc 1\Popish Legends, Or, Bible Truths-Cathrine Sinclair-1852.pdf
Disc 1\Priests Women and Families-Jules Michelet-Charles Cocks-Joseph Crookes-1845.pdf
Disc 1\Principles of the Jesuits-Challis Paroissien-1860.pdf
Disc 1\Progress and Supression of the Reformation in Spain-Thomas M’Crie-1829.pdf
Disc 1\Protestant Jesuitism-Calvin Colton-1836.pdf
Disc 1\Protestant Union-Milton-Burgess-1826.pdf
Disc 1\Public Opinion and Record of Educated,Talented Perpetrators-Charles William Gregory-1856.pdf
Disc 1\Public Opinion Concerning the World Press-Rodrigo Borgia-1902.pdf
Disc 2\Queer Blood-Allan Cantwell-1993.pdf
Disc 2\Reasons for Abjuring Allegiance to See of Rome-Peirce Connerly-1852.pdf
Disc 2\Religion and Educationin America-John Dunmore Lang 1840.pdf
Disc 2\Report of the Debates-Kentucky State Convention-Richard Sutton-1849.pdf
Disc 2\Review-Irish Civil Wars-John Curry-Charles O’Conner-1778.pdf
Disc 2\Revival of Popery Its Intolerant Character-William Blair 1819.pdf
Disc 2\Ritualism and New Testament Christianity-Verner White-1867.pdf
Disc 2\Roman Forgeries and Falsifications-Richard Gibbings-1849.pdf
Disc 2\Romanism As It Is-Samuel Weed Barnum-1882.pdf
Disc 2\Romanism as a World Power-Luther S. Kauffman-1922.pdf
Disc 2\Romanism in England Exposed-Charles Hastings Collette-1851.pdf
Disc 2\Romanism in the Light of History-Randolph McKim 1914.pdf
Disc 2\Romanism, As It Rules in Ireland-Mortimer O’Sullivan-Robert James M’Ghee-1840.pdf
Disc 2\Rome and The Assassination of Lincoln.pdf
Disc 2\Rome Christian and Papal-Luigi de Sanctis-1856.pdf
Disc 2\Rome in America-Justin D. Fulton-1884.pdf
Disc 2\Sabbath Laws and Sabbath Duties-Robert Cox-1853.pdf
Disc 2\Secret History of the Jesuits-Edmund Paris-.pdf
Disc 2\Secret Instructions of the Jesuits-1612.pdf
Disc 2\Secret Instructions of the Jesuits-William M’Gavin-1831.pdf
Disc 2\Secret Instructions-W.C. Brownlee-1857.pdf
Disc 2\Secret Plan of the Order-Abbate Leon-1898.pdf
Disc 2\Secrets of the Convent and Confessional-Julia Wright-Daniel March-1876.pdf
Disc 2\Select Works-Wycliffe Society-1846.pdf
Disc 2\Sermons by Henry Melvill and C.P. M’Ilvaine-1850.pdf
Disc 2\Sermons on Christian Doctrine-Frederick William Robertson-1907.pdf
Disc 2\Shelburne Essays-Paul Elmer More-1909.pdf
Disc 2\Six Years in the Monasteries of Italy-Two Years in Mediterranean Islands-S.I. Mahoney-1845.pdf
Disc 2\Sketches of Protestantism in Italy Past and Present-Robert Baird-1845.pdf
Disc 2\Sketches of Scottish Church History-Thomas M’Crie-1846.pdf
Disc 2\Startling Facts for Native Americans Called Knownothings-E. Hutchinson-1855.pdf
Disc 2\Story of the Puritans-Clarence Candace-Erroll Hulse-2000.pdf
Disc 2\Sunday Legislation-Abram Lewis-1902.pdf
Disc 2\Systematic Theology-Charles Hodge-1873.pdf
Disc 2\Tait’s Edinburgh Magazine-William Tait-Christian Isobell Johnstone-1841.pdf
Disc 2\Temple Bar Magazine-George Sala-Edmund Yates-1861.pdf
Disc 2\Testimonies to the Divine Authority and Inspiration of Scripture-Alexander McCaul and James Stephen-1862.pdf
Disc 2\Textbook of Popery Concerning the Council of Trent by John Mockett Cramp-1831.pdf
Disc 2\Textbook on Popery Concerning the Council of Trent-John Mockett Cramp-1839 Edition.pdf
Disc 2\The Academy-1873.pdf
Disc 2\The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe-Foxe-George Townsend-1844.pdf
Disc 2\The American Biblical Repository-1841.pdf
Disc 2\The American Catholic Quarterly Review-1882.pdf
Disc 2\The Anti-Jacobin Review-1807.pdf
Disc 2\The Bible Doctrine of Man-John Laidlaw-1879.pdf
Disc 2\The Bibliotheca Sacra and American Biblical Repository-1852.pdf
Disc 2\The Bibliotheca Sacra-Xenia Theological Seminary-1912.pdf
Disc 2\The Black Pope-M.F. Cusack-1896.pdf
Disc 2\The Bulwark Or Reformation Journal-1883.pdf
Disc 2\The Bulwark-Or Reformation Journal-Scottish Ref Society-1848.pdf
Disc 2\The Burning of the Bibles-John Dowling -W.C.Browlee-1843.pdf
Disc 2\The Catholic Encyclopedia-Charles Georg Herbermann-1913.pdf
Disc 2\The Catholic Encyclopedia-Charles George Herbmann-1911.pdf
Disc 2\The Christian Baptist-Alexander Campbell-1826.pdf
Disc 2\The Christian Examiner and Church of Ireland Magazine-1834.pdf
Disc 2\The Christian Examiner-1859.pdf
Disc 2\The Christian Guardian-Church of England Mag.-1846.pdf
Disc 2\The Church of England Quarterly Review-1858.pdf
Disc 2\The Church Quarterly Review-1888.pdf
Disc 2\The Church Quarterly Review-1889.pdf
Disc 2\The Church Review-Henry Mason Baum-1851.pdf
Disc 2\The Churchman, a Magazine in Defence of the Church and Constitution-1838.pdf
Disc 2\The Churchman’s Biblical and Ecclesiastical-1864.pdf
Disc 2\The Collected Writings of James Henley Thornwell-1871.pdf
Disc 2\The Complete Works of Richard Sibbes-1862.pdf
Disc 2\The Confessional Or An Exposition of Auricular Confessions-Joseph Frederick Berg-1841.pdf
Disc 2\The Confessions of St. Augustine-Edward Bouverie Pusey-1840.pdf
Disc 2\The Congregationalism of the Last 300 Years-Henry Martyn-1880.pdf
Disc 2\The Crisis-J. Waynes Laurens-1865.pdf
Disc 2\The Decline of Historic Bible Protestantism-Ronald Cooke-1986.pdf
Disc 2\The Doctrine of Justification-James Buchanan-1867.pdf
Disc 2\The Doctrine of Purgatory and the Practice of Praying for Dead- William John Hall-1843.pdf
Disc 2\The Doctrines and Practices of the Church of Rome Truly Represented-Edward Stillingfleet-William Cunningham-1837.pdf
Disc 2\The Dublin University Magazine-1868.pdf
Disc 2\The Duty and the Liberty of a Christian-Rev. Andrew Gray 1843.pdf
Disc 2\The Ecclesiastical History of M.L’abbe’ Fleury-Claude Fleury-John Henry-1842.pdf
Disc 2\The Eclectic Review-Jesuit Confessionals-1848.pdf
Disc 2\The Edinburgh Review-Smith-1855.pdf
Disc 2\The Edinburgh Review-Sydney Smith-1872.pdf
Disc 2\The Encyclopedia Americana-1919.pdf
Disc 2\The English Review-1847.pdf
Disc 2\The Evangelical Magazine and Missionary Chronicle-1851.pdf
Disc 2\The Evangelical Repository and United Presbyterian Review-1871.pdf
Disc 2\The Family History Book-Charles Benedict Davenport-1912.pdf
Disc 2\The Fight With Rome-Justin Dewey Fulton-1889.pdf
Disc 2\The Force.pdf
Disc 2\The Foreign Church Chronicle and Review-Anglo Continental Society-1890.pdf
Disc 2\THE FOREIGN QUARTERLY REVIEW-1829.pdf
Disc 2\The Forlorn Case of Popery or The Romanist Decieved-John Connell 1826.pdf
Disc 2\The Freethinker-1881.pdf
Disc 2\The French Revolution–A History-Thomas Carlyle-1867.pdf
Disc 2\The French Revolution-Thomas Carlyle-1914.pdf
Disc 2\The Future Life-Joseph Sasia-1918.pdf
Disc 2\The General Biographical Dictionary-Alexander Chalmers-1816.pdf
Disc 2\The Gentleman’s Magazine-1846.pdf
Disc 2\The Godfathers.pdf
Disc 2\The Gospel Magazine and Theological Review-1871.pdf
Disc 2\The Great Mystery of the Whore-George Fox-1831.pdf
Disc 2\The Gunpowder Treason-London-1679.pdf
Disc 2\The Hapsburg Monarchy-Henry Wickam Steed-1913.pdf
Disc 2\The History and Proceedings of the House of Lords From the Restoration-Ebenezer Timberlake-1697.pdf
Disc 2\The History of France-Eyre Evans Crowe-1866.pdf
Disc 2\The History of Mother Seton’s Daughters-Mary Agnes McCann-1917.pdf
Disc 2\The History of Paraguay-Charles Ames Washburn-1871.pdf
Disc 2\The History of the Assassins-Joseph Hammer Purgstall-Oswald Charles Wood-18.pdf
Disc 2\The History of the Council of Constance-James Lenfant-Stephen Whatley-1730.pdf
Disc 2\The History of the Jews-Gotthard Deutsch-1921.pdf
Disc 2\The History of the Papacy in the 19th Century-Fredrik Kristan Nielson-Arthur James Mason-1906.pdf
Disc 2\The History of the Reign of Emperor Charles V-William Robertson-1840.pdf
Disc 2\The Infallibility of the Church-George Salmon-1890.pdf
Disc 2\The Irish Monthly-Matthew Russell-1874.pdf
Disc 2\The Jacobitism Perjury and Popery-John Toland-Daniel Defoe-1710.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits 1534-1921-Thomas Joseph Campbell-1921.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits in Great Britian-Walter Walsh-1903.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits Proved to be Heretics-Dennett-1829.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits Their Foundation and History-Barbara Frances-1879.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits Their Moral Maxims and Plots-J.A. Wylie-1881.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits Their Principles and Acts-Edward Dalton-1843.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits, Their Rise and Progress, Doctrines, and Morality-T.H. Usborne-1851.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits, Thier Origin, Order, Morality & Practices-Alexander Duff-1852.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits-Barbara Courson-1879.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits-Jules Michelet-1848.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits-Jules Michelet-Edgar Quinet-Charles Edwards Lester-1848.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits-Robert William Overbury-1846.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits-Their Open and Secret Proceedings–Theodore Griesinger-Andrew James Scott-1903.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits-Theodore Griesinger-1903-Ver.2.pdf
Disc 2\The Jesuits-William Cornwallis Cartwright-1876.pdf
Disc 2\The Knowledge of God and Its Historical Developement-Henry Melvill Gwatkin-1908_.pdf
Disc 2\The Lectures Complete of Father Gavazzi-Alessandro Gavazzi-Giovanni Battista Nicolini-1854.pdf
Disc 2\The Liberty of Prophesying-Hensley Henson-1909.pdf
Disc 2\The Life of John Calvin-Thomas Dyer-1855.pdf
Disc 2\The Life of John Calvin-ver.2.pdf
Disc 2\The Life of the Rev Joseph White (Popish Protestants)-Joseph Blanco White-John Hamilton Thorn-1845.pdf
Disc 2\The Life of William Chillingworth-Pierre Desmaizeaux-1863.pdf
Disc 2\The Local Preachers’ Magazine and Christian Family Record-Wesleyan Methodist-1871.pdf
Disc 2\The Lost and Hostile Gospels-Sabine Gould-1874.pdf
Disc 2\The Marquis of Pombal-John Athelstane Smith Carnota-1871.pdf
Disc 2\The Messenger-Ligouri-1902.pdf
Disc 2\The Millennial Harbinger-Charles Loos,Alexander Campbell-1844.pdf
Disc 2\The Monarchy of the Middle Classes in France-Henery-Lytton-Bulwer-Dalling-1836.pdf
Disc 2\The Monthly Mirror Reflecting Men and Manners-1810.pdf
Disc 2\The Mysteries of Romanism-Charles Sparry-1847.pdf
Disc 2\The New Conspiracy Against the Jesuits, Detected and Briefly Exposed-Robert Charles Dallas-1815.pdf
Disc 2\The New Schaff Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge-1910.pdf
Disc 2\The North British Review-1845.pdf
Disc 2\The Open Court-Paul Carus-1902.pdf
Disc 2\The Papacy is the Antichrist-J.A. Wylie-1888.pdf
Disc 2\The Parliamentary History of England From the Earliest Period to 1803-Britian-1810.pdf
Disc 2\The Passing of Spain and the Ascendency of America-Jerome Bruce Crabtree-1898.pdf
Disc 2\The Penny Protestant Operative-Protestant Association-1843.pdf
Disc 2\The Pope’s Cabinet Unlocked, by the Author of ‘Gerald’-Gorges Lowthar-1849.pdf
Disc 2\The Popes of Rome-Ronald Cooke-1999.pdf
Disc 2\The Principles of Holy Christian Religion-Richard Sherlock-1841.pdf
Disc 2\The Prophet.pdf
Disc 2\The Protestant’s Armory-by Protestant-1839.pdf
Disc 2\The Protestant-William M’Gavin-1833.pdf
Disc 2\The Pulpit Commentary-H.D.M. Spence-1887.pdf
Disc 2\The Puritan in Holland England and America-Vol. 2-Douglas Campbell-1893.pdf
Disc 2\The Purple and Scarlet Woman and Her Relatives-Albert King-1900.pdf
Disc 2\The Quarterly Journal of Prophecy-1850.pdf
Disc 2\The Religion of Ancient Britain-George Smith-1844.pdf
Disc 2\The Reliques of Father Prout-Francis Sylvester Mahony-1873.pdf
Disc 2\The Revival of Popery, Its Intolerant Character Political Tendency and Unceasing Usurpations-William Blair-1819.pdf
Disc 2\The Rise of the Dutch Republic-John Lothrop Motley-1901.pdf
Disc 2\The Rise of the Dutch Republic-John Lothrop Motley-1909.pdf
Disc 2\The Road to Lige-The Path of Crime-Gustave Somville-1916.pdf
Disc 2\The Roman Catholic Church Challenged-Ceasar Augustus Yarbough-1920.pdf
Disc 2\The Romish and Prelatical Rite of Confirmation Examined-Thomas Smyth-1845.pdf
Disc 2\The Rule of Faith-Sermon-Henry Edward Manning-1838.pdf
Disc 2\The School Girl in France-Rachel M’Crindell 1845.pdf
Disc 2\The Scottish Review-William Metcalfe,Ruaraidh Erskine-1892.pdf
Disc 2\The Secret Societies of the European Revolution-Thomas Frost-1876.pdf
Disc 2\The Shortest Way to End Disputes about Religion-Robert Manning-1855.pdf
Disc 2\The Soul in the Unseen World-Reginald Ernest Hutton-1902.pdf
Disc 2\The Spanish Armada A D 1588-Thomas Lathbury-1811.pdf
Disc 2\The Spirit of Popery An Exposurer of it’s Origin Character and Results-Spirit-1840.pdf
Disc 2\The Spiritual Magazine-1874.pdf
Disc 2\The Standard of the Spirit Lifted Up-Thomas Bell 1780.pdf
Disc 2\The State of Popery and Jesuitism in England From the Reformation to 1829-Thomas Lathbury-1838.pdf
Disc 2\The Story of Rome-Norwood Young-Nelly Erichsen-1901.pdf
Disc 2\The Students’ Cabinet Library of Useful Tracts-1839.pdf
Disc 2\The Theological and Miscellaneous Works of the Rev. William Jones-1826.pdf
Disc 2\The Theological Monthly-1889.pdf
Disc 2\The Travels of Several Learned Missioners of the Society of Jesus-By Jesuit Antonio Diereville-Antonio de Orellana-1714.pdf
Disc 2\The Truthseeker in Philosphy Literature and Religion- F.R. Lees-1849.pdf
Disc 2\The Two Babylons-Alexander Hislop-1885.pdf
Disc 2\The United States Catholic Magazine-1848.pdf
Disc 2\The Universalist Quarterly-Jesuit Textbooks-1884.pdf
Disc 2\The Variations of Popery-Samuel Edgar-1855.pdf
Disc 2\The Vatican Jesuit Global Conspiracy-Dr. Ronald Cooke-1985.pdf
Disc 2\The Vatican’s Last Crime-Joseph McCabe.pdf
Disc 2\The Wandering Jew-Eugene Sue-1903.pdf
Disc 2\The Wandering Jew-Moncure Daniel Conway-1881.pdf
Disc 2\The Western Messenger-William Henry Channing-1836.pdf
Disc 2\The Works Memoirs & Notes-John Sage(Bishop of Scotland)-1846.pdf
Disc 2\The Works of Augustus Toplady-1825.pdf
Disc 2\The Works of John Owen-Goold-1851.pdf
Disc 2\The Works of John Whitgift-Ayre-Parker Society-1853.pdf
Disc 2\The Works of Jonathan Swift-1768.pdf
Disc 2\The Works of the Most Reverend Father in God-John Barmhall-1845.pdf
Disc 2\The Works of the Right Reverend John England-Messmer-1908.pdf
Disc 2\The Works of William Channing-1849.pdf
Disc 2\The Works of Wmilliam Ellery Channing-1835.pdf
Disc 2\Thirty Years in Hell-Ex-Priest Fresenborg 2006.pdf
Disc 2\Thirty Years’ War-Schiller.pdf
Disc 2\Thoughts on Popery-William Nevins-1863.pdf
Disc 2\Tract 40 on Certain Passages in the XXXIX Articles-John Henry Newman-Edward Pusey-John Keble-1865.pdf
Disc 2\Tractarianism and Popery-John Cumming-1843.pdf
Disc 2\Tracts for theTimes-Froude-Newman-Pusey-1840.pdf
Disc 2\Treason and Plot-Martin Andrew Sharp Hume-1901.pdf
Disc 2\Truth Triumphant Through the Spiritual Warfare, Christian Labours-Robert Barclay-George Keith-1831.pdf
Disc 2\Views in Theology-Lyman Beecher-1836.pdf
Disc 2\Waldensians on Antichrist-Rand Winburn-1618.pdf
Disc 2\Washinton in The Lap of Rome-Justin D. Fulton-1888.pdf
Disc 2\Why Priests Should Wed-Justin D. Fulton-1888.pdf
Disc 2\Wide Awake Romanism and It’s Aims and Tendencies-L. W. Granger-1854.pdf
Disc 2\William George Ward and the Oxford Movement-George Ward-1889.pdf
Disc 2\Works on Episcopacy-John Bowden-John Cooke-Benjamin Onderdonk-1831.pdf
Disc 2\Writings of John Quincy Adams-W.C. Ford-1916.pdf
Disc 3\A Collection of the Reports of Cases, the Statutes, and Ecclesiastical Laws, Relating to Tithes-Francis King Eagle-1826.pdf
Disc 3\A Commentary on the New Code of Canon Law-Charles Agustine Bachofen-1920.pdf
Disc 3\A Compendium of the Systems of Divine Truth-Jacob Catlin-1818.pdf
Disc 3\A Complete Collection of the Protests of Parliament-1875.pdf
Disc 3\A Complete History of the United States-Frederick Butler-1821.pdf
Disc 3\A Dean of Glocester-Estwick-Tucker-Pre 1801 Imprint Collection-Letter to the Reverend Josiah Tucker-1776.pdf
Disc 3\A Dictionary of Religion and Ethics-Shailer Mathews-1912.pdf
Disc 3\A Discourse Against Transubstantiation-John Tillotson-1685.pdf
Disc 3\A Dogmatical and Practical Treatise on Indulgences-Jean Baptiste Bouvier-1839.pdf
Disc 3\A Finding-List of History, Politics, Biography, Geography, Travel and Anthropology, in the Young Men’s Library at Buffalo-1896.pdf
Disc 3\A Guide From the Church of Rome to the Church of Christ-Rev Dr Urwick-1836.pdf
Disc 3\A History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences in the Latin Church-Henry Charles Lea-1896.pdf
Disc 3\A History of Egypt in the Middle Ages-Stanley Lane Poole-1901.pdf
Disc 3\A History of Italian Unity-Bolton King-1912.pdf
Disc 3\A History of Japan-James Murdoch-Isoh Yamagata-1903.pdf
Disc 3\A History of Preaching from the Apostolic Fathers to the Great Reformers-Edwin Charles Dargan-1905.pdf
Disc 3\A History of the Free Churches of England From 1688-1851-Herbert Skeats-1868.pdf
Disc 3\A History of the Papacy-Leupold Ranke-J.A. Merle d’Aubigne-1851.pdf
Disc 3\A History of the Philippines-David Prescott Barrows–1914.pdf
Disc 3\A History of the Reformation in Germany-Vol. One-Thomas Martin Lindsay-1906.pdf
Disc 3\A History of the Reformation-Vol. Two-Thomas Martin Lindsay-1907.pdf
Disc 3\A Legacy to Great Britain-James Billet-1865.pdf
Disc 3\A Letter to John Wesley(concerning Augustus Toplady)-Richard Hill-1780.pdf
Disc 3\A Lexicon of Freemasonry-Albert Gallatin Mackey-1859.pdf
Disc 3\A Library of Freemasonry-Robert Freke Gould-1906.pdf
Disc 3\A Manual of the History of Dogmas-Bernard John Otten-1918.pdf
Disc 3\A Paraphrase With Notes and a Preface Upon the Sixth Chapter of St John-William Clagett-1686.pdf
Disc 3\A Plain Representation of Transubstantiation as it is Receiveded in the Church of Rome-Henry Pendlebury-1687.pdf
Disc 3\A Practical Guide to Indulgences-Marcel Bernad-Daniel Murray-1898.pdf
Disc 3\A Presbyterian Clergyman Looking for the Chruch-John Burton-1858.pdf
Disc 3\A Short History of the Inquisition-Truth Seeker Co.-1913.pdf
Disc 3\A Short History of the Philippines-Prescott Ford Jernegan-1905.pdf
Disc 3\A Summary of Modern History-Jules Michelet-Mary Simpson-1875.pdf
Disc 3\A Summary-Historical and Political Progress of British Settlements-William Douglass-1760.pdf
Disc 3\A Synopsis of the Moral Theology of the Church of Rome-Alfonso Maria de’Ligouri-1836.pdf
Disc 3\A Tractate on Language-Gordon Willoughby-James Gyll-1860.pdf
Disc 3\A Vindication of the Church of England, From Charges Brought Against Her in The Christian’s Penny Magazine-George Sandford-1847.pdf
Disc 3\Against the Reformers-Alphonsus De Liguori.pdf
Disc 3\Aletheia-Charles Constantine Pise-1843.pdf
Disc 3\An Account of the Life and Writings of Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons and Martyr-James Beaven-1841.pdf
Disc 3\An Epitome of the Case of Irish Corporations-John Dallas Edge-Citizens of Dublin-1839.pdf
Disc 3\An Essay on the Spirit and Influence of the Reformation of Luther-Charles de Villers-James Mill-1805.pdf
Disc 3\An Exhortation to Peace and Unity-John Bunyan-1845.pdf
Disc 3\An Historical Presentation of Augustinism and Pelagianism-Gustav Friedrich Wiggers-1840.pdf
Disc 3\An Historical Sketch of the Portuguese Settlements in China-Andrew Ljungstedt-1836.pdf
Disc 3\An Impartial History of Ireland From the English Invaison-Dennis Taaffe-1811.pdf
Disc 3\An Inquiry Into the Principal Points of Difference Between the Two Churches-David O. Croly-1835.pdf
Disc 3\An Open Letter on Translating -Martin Luther-1530.pdf
Disc 3\Anecdotes and Examples Illustrating the Catholic Catechism-Francis Spirago-1904.pdf
Disc 3\Anti-Methodist Publications Issued During the 18th Century-Richard Green-1902.pdf
Disc 3\Apocalyptic Sketches-Or Lectures on the Book of Revelation-John Cumming-1851.pdf
Disc 3\Arminianism vs Hyper-Calvinism 3 Letters to S. Cozens-Phillip Pugh-1860.pdf
Disc 3\Atheism Among the People-Alphonse de Lamartine-1850.pdf
Disc 3\Aurelian or Rome in the Third Century-William Ware-1838.pdf
Disc 3\Babylon the Great-A Dissection and Demonstration of Men-Robert Mudie-1828.pdf
Disc 3\Baroque Architecture-Martin Shaw Briggs-1914.pdf
Disc 3\Before Armageddon-Albion Fox Ballenger-1918.pdf
Disc 3\Bibliography of the Philippine Islands-James Alexander Robertson-1908.pdf
Disc 3\Birthright in Land-William Olgilvie-1891.pdf
Disc 3\Bohemia and the Czechs-Will Seymore Monroe-1910.pdf
Disc 3\Bohemia Under Hapsburg Misrule-Thomas Capek-1915.pdf
Disc 3\Cagliostro-The Splendour and Misery of a Master of Magic-William Hayes Trowbridge-1910.pdf
Disc 3\Calvinism and Arminianism Compared in Their Principles and Tendency-Laurence Womock-1824.pdf
Disc 3\Cambridge Sermons-Joseph Barber Lightfoot-1890.pdf
Disc 3\Canons of the Lateran Council 1215.pdf
Disc 3\Catalogue of Works in Refutation of Methodism-Curtis H. Cavender-H.C. Decanver-1846.pdf
Disc 3\Catholic Champion-Guild of St. Ignaitius-Aurther Ritchie-1896.pdf
Disc 3\Catholic Eschatology and Universalism-An Essay on the Doctrine of Future Retribution-Frank Nutcombe Oxenham-1876.pdf
Disc 3\Catholic Italy- Its Institutions and Sanctuaries-Charles Isidore Hermans-1860.pdf
Disc 3\Catholics and the American Revolution-Martin Ignatius Joseph Griffin-1907.pdf
Disc 3\Catholics in the Witness Box-L.K. Kentish Rankin-1936.pdf
Disc 3\Celebration of the Centennial Anniversary of the Evacuation of Boston-1876.pdf
Disc 3\Chambers’ Papers for the People-1872.pdf
Disc 3\Chambers’s Papers for the People-1855.pdf
Disc 3\Charles and Josiah, Or Friendly Conversations Between a Churchman and a Quaker-Jonathan Pim-1862.pdf
Disc 3\Christian Brotherhoods-Frederick Deland Leete-1912.pdf
Disc 3\Christian Science and the Catholic Faith-Augustine Matthias Bellwald-1922.pdf
Disc 3\Christmas-Its Origin and Asssociations-Dawson-1902.pdf
Disc 3\Christ’s Discourse at Capernaum-George Farber-Patrick Wiseman-1840.pdf
Disc 3\Christ’s Vision of the Kingdom of Heaven-James Frazer Stirling-1913.pdf
Disc 3\Church and State in France-Frederick Caesar de Sumichrast-1907.pdf
Disc 3\Confessions of a French Catholic Priest-Samuel Finley Breese Morse-1837.pdf
Disc 3\Constitutiones Societatis Iesu Anno 1558-by Jesuits-1838.pdf
Disc 3\Covenants Sermons and Documents of the Covenanted-Edited by James Kerr-1895.pdf
Disc 3\Despotism-Or the Last Days of the American Republic-Reuben Vose-1856.pdf
Disc 3\Discourses Concerning the Truth of the Christian Religion and Remarks on Ecclesiastical History-John Jortin-Rogers Jortin-1805.pdf
Disc 3\Early Methodists Under Persecution-Josiah Henry Barr-1916.pdf
Disc 3\England and the English-Edward Lytrton-1836.pdf
Disc 3\Essays in Puritanism-Andrew Macphail-1905.pdf
Disc 3\Evenings with the Romanists-Michael Seymore-Stephen Tying-1856.pdf
Disc 3\Familiar Instructions on the Sacraments-William Stone-1881.pdf
Disc 3\Father Gavazzi’s Lectures in New York-Alessandro Gavazzi-Giuseppe Maria Campanella-1853.pdf
Disc 3\Florence Templar-Mary Theresa Vidal-1856.pdf
Disc 3\Foreign Missions of the Protestant Churches-Stephen Livingstone Baldwin-1900.pdf
Disc 3\Forty Years in the Church of Christ-Chiniquy-1899.pdf
Disc 3\Foxe’s Book of Martyrs With Notes by Rev. J. Milner.-John Foxe-1848.pdf
Disc 3\Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country-1834.pdf
Disc 3\French Civilization-Albert Leon Guerard-1921.pdf
Disc 3\Garibaldi at Home-Charles Rhoderick McGrigor-1866.pdf
Disc 3\General History of the Christian Religion and Church-Translated by J. Torrey-Johann Neander-1855.pdf
Disc 3\Gleanings in Genesis-Arthur Walkington Pink-1922.pdf
Disc 3\Glimpses of Bohemia, Past and Present-James MacDonald-1882.pdf
Disc 3\God and Sin in the Appetites-Jacob Hartmann-1894.pdf
Disc 3\God in the Bible With Preludes and Other Addresses on Leading Reforms-Joseph Cook-1889.pdf
Disc 3\Greory XI and Wycliffe Condemnation and Reply-1384-Paul Halsall March-1998.pdf
Disc 3\Guatimala-A Twelve Month’s Residence-Henry Dunn-1828.pdf
Disc 3\Guide to the Materials for American History in Roman and Other Italian Archives-Carl Fish-1911.pdf
Disc 3\Handbook of the Christian Religion for the Use of Advanced Students and the Educated Laity-Wilhelm Wilmers-James Conway-1891.pdf
Disc 3\Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates-Thomas Curson Hansard-1848.pdf
Disc 3\Harmonia Apostolica-Two Dissertations on Justification by Works Doctrine in St. James-George Bull-1844.pdf
Disc 3\Historical Essays by Members of the Owen College-Manchester-Thomas Tout-James Tait-1907.pdf
Disc 3\Historical Notices of Events Occurring Chiefly in the Reign of Charles I-Nehemiah Wallington-1869.pdf
Disc 3\Historical Records and Studies-U.S. Catholic Historical Society-1921.pdf
Disc 3\History of France From the Invasion of the Franks Under Clovis, to the Accession of Louis Philippe-Emile de Bonnechose-1856.pdf
Disc 3\History of Linn County Iowa-Luther Albertus Brewer-1911.pdf
Disc 3\History of the Church-Ecclesiastical History-Joseph Chantrel-1883.pdf
Disc 3\History of the Council of Trent-Felix Bungener-1855.pdf
Disc 3\History of the Eighteenth Century and of the Nineteenth Till the Overthrow of the French Empire-Friedrich Christoph Schlosser-David Davison-1845.pdf
Disc 3\History of the French Revolution-1789-1814-F.A.M. Mignet-1915.pdf
Disc 3\History of the Knights Templars of Canada-John Ross-1890.pdf
Disc 3\History of the Middle Ages-Francois Gazeau-1887.pdf
Disc 3\History of the Reformed Religion in France-Edward Smedley-1834.pdf
Disc 3\Hungary in Ancient, Medieval, and Modern Times-Armin Vambery-1887s.pdf
Disc 3\Hungary-Armin Vambery-Louis Heilprin-1898.pdf
Disc 3\Hymns and Sacred Poems by Agustus M. Toplady-1860.pdf
Disc 3\Hypnotism and Spiritism-Giuseppe Lapponi-Phillip Gibbs-1907.pdf
Disc 3\Ignatius Loyola and the Early Jesuits-Stewart Rose-1870.pdf
Disc 3\Indulgences as a Social Factor in the Middle Ages-Dr. Nikolaus Paulus-1922.pdf
Disc 3\Infant Baptism a Part and Pillar of Popery-John Gill-George Barton Ide-1851.pdf
Disc 3\Inquiry Into the Doctrines of the Anglo-Saxon Church-Henry Soames-1830.pdf
Disc 3\Italy and the Italian Islands-William Spalding-1845.pdf
Disc 3\Japan in History Folklore and Art-William Elliot Griffis-1892.pdf
Disc 3\Jesuit Education-Robert Schwickerath-1903.pdf
Disc 3\Jesuits Estates Answer to Monteal Star-Jones-1888.pdf
Disc 3\John Thadeus Delane-Editor of The Times-Arthur Irwin Dasent-1908.pdf
Disc 3\Journal of Sacred Literature-1859.pdf
Disc 3\Lancashire Puritan Non Conformity-Robert Halley-1872.pdf
Disc 3\Lectures on Missions and Evangelism-Andrew Somerville-1874.pdf
Disc 3\Lectures on the Book of Revelation-John Brown-1866.pdf
Disc 3\Lectures on the Principal Doctrines and Practices of the Catholic Church-Nicholas Wiseman-1836.pdf
Disc 3\Letters and Instructions of Ignatius Loyola-Rev. Alban Goodier-1914.pdf
Disc 3\Letters Describing Romanism in Its Origin Character and End-W. Drysdale-James M. King-Rev. E.C. Fabre-1887.pdf
Disc 3\Letters on the Moral and Religious State of South America-James Thompson-1827.pdf
Disc 3\Letters to Charles Butler on the Theological Parts of His Book of the Roman Catholic Church-Henry Phillpotts-Charles Butler-1826.pdf
Disc 3\Letters to the Protestants of Scotland-George Sinclair-1852.pdf
Disc 3\Li Hung Chang’s Scrapbook-Hongzhang Li-Hung Chang Li-1913.pdf
Disc 3\Lives of Cardinal Alberoni-The Duke of Ripperda and Marquis of Pombal-George Moore-1814.pdf
Disc 3\Louis Napoleon the Destined Monarch of The World and Personal Anti-Christ-Michael Paget Baxter-1863.pdf
Disc 3\Magicon-Wonderful Prophecies Concerning Popery and It’s Impending Overthrow-M. Paulus-1869.pdf
Disc 3\Maria Stuart-Friedrich Schiller-Heinrich Heskamp-1893.pdf
Disc 3\Marriage Affinity Question or Marriage With Sister of Deceaced Wife-James Gibson-1854.pdf
Disc 3\Martin’s History of France-Heneri Martin-1866.pdf
Disc 3\Memoir of William Knibb Missionary in Jamaica-John Howard Hinton-William Knob-1847.pdf
Disc 3\Memoirs of the Life and Writings of the Rev. A.M. Toplady-William Winters-1872.pdf
Disc 3\Memoirs of the Secret Societies of the South of Italy-Bertoldi-1821.pdf
Disc 3\Men Manners and Morals in South America-John Otway Percy Bland-1920.pdf
Disc 3\Modern Europe-Thomas Henry Dyer-1877.pdf
Disc 3\Modern History-Jules Michelet-Alonzo Potter-1846.pdf
Disc 3\Monks and Their Decline-George Zucher-1898.pdf
Disc 3\Moravian Missions-Agustus Charles Thompson-1890.pdf
Disc 3\Mores Catholici-Kenelm Henery Digby-1889.pdf
Disc 3\Movements in Religious Thought, Romanism, Protestantism, Agnosticism-Edward Hayes Plumptre-1879.pdf
Disc 3\Multum in Parvo-The Great Anti-Christian Conspiracy-Andeas Bernardus Smolnikar-1853.pdf
Disc 3\Mysteria-Otto Henne am Rhyn-1895.pdf
Disc 3\No Union With Rome-An Anti-Eirenicon-Alessandro Gavazzi-Edward Puesy-1866.pdf
Disc 3\Odd Fellows’ Literary Casket-William Peter Strickland-Independent Orders of Oddfellows-1854.pdf
Disc 3\Old Rome and New Italy-Emilio Castelar-1873.pdf
Disc 3\Oliver Cromwell and the Rule of the Puritans in England-Charles Harding Firth-1903.pdf
Disc 3\Oliver Cromwell-John Morley-1902.pdf
Disc 3\Outlines of Dogmatic Theology-Sylvester Joseph Hunter-1909.pdf
Disc 3\Papal Indulgences-Two Lectures in Examination of a Work on Indulgences-Robert Maguire-Jean Baptist Bouvier-1852.pdf
Disc 3\Papal Rome as it Is, by a Roman-L. Gustiniani-1843.pdf
Disc 3\Philosophical History of Free-Masonry and Other Secret Societies-Augustus C.L. Arnold-1854.pdf
Disc 3\Pilgrimages to Saint Mary of Walsingham and Saint Thomas of Canterbury-Erasmus-John Nichols-1849.pdf
Disc 3\Popery British and Foreign-Walter Savage Landor-1851.pdf
Disc 3\Popery the Enemy and the Falsifier of Scripture-Thomas Hartwell Horne-1845.pdf
Disc 3\Punch-Mark Lemon-Herery Mayhew-1865.pdf
Disc 3\Putnam’s Monthly-1855.pdf
Disc 3\Records of the English Province of the Society of Jesus in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries-Henery Foley-1878.pdf
Disc 3\Reminiscences of a Country Journalist-Thomas Frost-1886.pdf
Disc 3\Rule and Misrule of the English in America-Thomas Chandler Haliburton-1851.pdf
Disc 3\Savonarola, Erasmus and Other Essays-Henry Hart Milman-1870.pdf
Disc 3\Scarlet Book of Free Masonry-Moses Wolcott Redding-1893.pdf
Disc 3\Secret Societies and the French Revolution-Una Pope-Hennessey-1911.pdf
Disc 3\Secret Societies of the Middle Ages-Thomas Kneightley-1827.pdf
Disc 3\Shawmut-The Settlement of Boston by Puritans-Charles Kitterredge True-1848.pdf
Disc 3\Short History of Christian Missions-George Smith-1884.pdf
Disc 3\Short Sketches of Some Notable Lives-John Campbell Colquhoun-1855.pdf
Disc 3\Sin Apprehended Tried and Condemned-Richard Bernard-1851.pdf
Disc 3\Sixteen Lectures on the Causes, Principles, and Results, of the British Reformation-John Henry Hopkins-1844.pdf
Disc 3\Sketches and Hints of Church History and Theological Controversy-John Erskine-1790.pdf
Disc 3\Socialism Feminism and Suffragism-Benjamin Vestal Hubbard-1915.pdf
Disc 3\Special Collections in Libraries in the United States-William Johnston-Isadore Mudge-1912.pdf
Disc 3\Specimens of Middle Scots-George Gregory Smith-1902.pdf
Disc 3\St John VI-A Key to the Anti-Transubstantiation View-A Clergyman-1875.pdf
Disc 3\Studies and Illustrations of the Great Rebellion-John Langton Sanford-1858.pdf
Disc 3\Supplement t o Six Months in a Convent-Rebecca Theresa Reed-1835.pdf
Disc 3\The American Cyclopaedia-Charles Anderson Dana-1874.pdf
Disc 3\The American Freemasons New Monthly Magazine-1856.pdf
Disc 3\The American Historical Review-1908.pdf
Disc 3\The Anatomy of Melancholy-Robert Burton-1857.pdf
Disc 3\The Ancient Church-William Dool Killen-1859.pdf
Disc 3\The Anti-Masonic Review and Magazine-Henery Danta Ward-1828.pdf
Disc 3\The Apology of the Church of England-John Jewel-1888.pdf
Disc 3\The Art of the Vatican-Mary Knight Potter-1903.pdf
Disc 3\The Aspects of Religion in the United States of America-Isabella Lucy Bird-1859.pdf
Disc 3\The Baptists in America-Francis Augustus Cox-James Hoby-1836.pdf
Disc 3\The Bible Against Protestantism and for Catholicity-Lawrence B. Shell-1846.pdf
Disc 3\The Body of Christ-Charles Gore-1901.pdf
Disc 3\The Book of Holy Indulgences-Michael Comerford-1876.pdf
Disc 3\The Burning of the Bibles-John Dowling-WC Brownlee-1843.pdf
Disc 3\The Bystander-1890.pdf
Disc 3\The Catholic Encyclopedia-Charles George Herbmann-1913.pdf
Disc 3\The Catholic Handbook or Every Protestant is His Own Controvesalist-John Heron Macguire-1851.pdf
Disc 3\The Catholic History of North America-Thomas D’Arcy McGee-1836.pdf
Disc 3\The Causes of the War of Independence-Claude Halstead Van Tyne-1922.pdf
Disc 3\The Censorship of the Church of Rome-George Haven Putnam-1907.pdf
Disc 3\The Christian Observer-1831.pdf
Disc 3\The Christian Sacraments-John Seely Stone-1866.pdf
Disc 3\The Christian World-American and Foreign Christian Union-1869.pdf
Disc 3\The Chruch and the Barbarians-William Holden Hutton-1906.pdf
Disc 3\The Church History of Britain-Thomas Fuller- James Nichols-1842.pdf
Disc 3\The Church in Germany-Sabine Baring Gould-1891.pdf
Disc 3\The Church of Romam in Her Primitive Purity Compared With the Church of Rome-John Henry Hopkins-1839.pdf
Disc 3\The Church of Rome-William Lockett-1907.pdf
Disc 3\The Counter Reformation-Adolphus William Ward-1889.pdf
Disc 3\The Cyclopedia of Fraternities-Albert Clark Stevens-1907.pdf
Disc 3\The Decline of the French Monarchy-Heneri Martin-1866.pdf
Disc 3\The Difficulties of Romanism-George Stanley Farber-1829.pdf
Disc 3\The Doctrine of Absolute Predestination-Girolamo Zanchi-Augustus Toplady-Justus Lipsius-1811.pdf
Disc 3\The Doctrine of the Church of England on the Holy Communion Restated-Frederick Meyrick-1885.pdf
Disc 3\The Doctrine of the Real Presence-Edward Bouverie Pusey-1855.pdf
Disc 3\The English in America-Thomas Chandler Haliburton-1851.pdf
Disc 3\The Essence of Religious Controversy, a Series of Observations on a Protestant Catechism-William Coombes-1827.pdf
Disc 3\The Freemason’s Manual-Illustrations of Masonry-Jeremiah How-1862.pdf
Disc 3\The Freemasons’ Monthly Magazine-Moore-1864.pdf
Disc 3\The Gnostics and Their Remains-Charles William King-1887.pdf
Disc 3\The Golden Book of the Confraternities-Rev. John Hughes-1854.pdf
Disc 3\The Gospel Standard or Feeble Christian-1851.pdf
Disc 3\The Great American Battle-Anna Ella Carroll-1856.pdf
Disc 3\The Historians’ History of the World-Henery Smith Williams-1905.pdf
Disc 3\The History of Cottingham-Charles Overton-1861.pdf
Disc 3\The History of Free Masonry and the Grand Lodge of Scotland-William Laurie-1859.pdf
Disc 3\The History of Mohammedanism and Its Sects-William Cooke Taylor-1857.pdf
Disc 3\The History of Popish Transubstantiation-John Cosin-John Brewer-1840.pdf
Disc 3\The History of the Early Puritans-John Buxton Marsden-1853.pdf
Disc 3\The History of the Popes, From the Close of the Middle Ages-Ludwig Pastor-Frederick Ignatius Antrobus-1891.pdf
Disc 3\The History of the Popes-Leopold von Ranke-Walter Keating Kelly-1844.pdf
Disc 3\The History of the Puritans- Protestant Non-Conformists-Daniel Neal-1817.pdf
Disc 3\The History of the Reformation of the Church of England- Henry Soames-1827.pdf
Disc 3\The History of the Religion of Ancient Britain-George Smith-1865.pdf
Disc 3\The History of the Society of Friends in America-James Bowden-1850.pdf
Disc 3\The History of the University of Dublin-John William Stubbs-1889.pdf
Disc 3\The Home and Foreign Record of the Free Church of Scotland-1855.pdf
Disc 3\The Idol Demolished by Its Own Priest-James Sheridan Knowles-1852.pdf
Disc 3\The Israel of the Alps-A History of the Persecutions of the Waldenses-Alexis Muston-1852.pdf
Disc 3\The Jesuits as They Were and Are-Eduard Duller-Stanley Carr-1845.pdf
Disc 3\The Journal of Sacred Literature-John Kitto-1859.pdf
Disc 3\The King Over the Water-Alice Shield-Andrew Lang-1907.pdf
Disc 3\The Kiss of Peace-Gerald Cobb-1867.pdf
Disc 3\The Last Days-Their Near Approach and Perilous Character-1843.pdf
Disc 3\The Life and Letters of St. Francis Xavier-Henry James Coleridge-1872.pdf
Disc 3\The Life and Writings of George Washington Doane-George and William Doane-1860.pdf
Disc 3\The Life Times and Correspondence of Dr. Doyle-William John Fitzpatrick-1880.pdf
Disc 3\The Light of the West-A Historical Sketch of the Protestant Church-Rupert Rowton-1869.pdf
Disc 3\The Lives of the British Reformers-George Stokes-1841.pdf
Disc 3\The London Quarterly Review-1874.pdf
Disc 3\The Magazine of the Reformed Dutch Church-William Brownlee-1827.pdf
Disc 3\The Millennial Harbinger-AlexanderCampbell-William Kimbrough Pendleton-1835.pdf
Disc 3\The Moravian Manual-Edmund Alexander De Schweinitz-1859.pdf
Disc 3\The Mystic Star-1870.pdf
Disc 3\The Napoleonic Empire in Southern Italy and the Rise of the Secret Societies-Robert Matteson Johnson-1904.pdf
Disc 3\The New Raccolta-Collection of Prayers and Good Work-Indulgences-Catholic Church-1872.pdf
Disc 3\The New Werner 20th Century Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica-1907.pdf
Disc 3\The People’s Right Defended-Wickliffe-Samuel Grover Winchester-John Tillotson-1831.pdf
Disc 3\The Philippine Islands 1493-1803-Emma Helen Blair-James Alexander Robertson-Edward Gaylord Bourne-1908.pdf
Disc 3\The Philippine Islands-John Foreman-1906.pdf
Disc 3\The Political Evolution of the Hungarian Nation-Cecil Marcus Knatchbull–1908.pdf
Disc 3\The Port Folio-Joseph Dennie-Oliver Oldschool-1827.pdf
Disc 3\The Priesthood, the Altar, and the Sacrifice in the Christian Church-Christian Church-1877.pdf
Disc 3\The Principles of the Jesuits-Henry Handley Norris-1839.pdf
Disc 3\The Psalmists of Britain-John Holland-1843.pdf
Disc 3\The Reformation and Anti-Reformation in Bohemia-Christian Adolph Pescheck-1845.pdf
Disc 3\The Reformation Settlement Examined in History and Law-Malcolm MacColl-1899.pdf
Disc 3\The Reformed Presbytery-1638-1649.pdf
Disc 3\The Religious Condition of Christendom-Evangelical Alliaqnce-1857.pdf
Disc 3\The Religious Monitor and Evangelical Repository-Assoc. Synod Of North America-1838.pdf
Disc 3\The Remains of Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury-Cranmer-Henry Jenkyns-1833.pdf
Disc 3\The Report of the Philippine Commission to the President-Jesuitss-1900.pdf
Disc 3\The Rise of Religious Liberty in America-Sanford Hoadley Cobb-1902.pdf
Disc 3\The Rise of the Hugenots-Henri Martyn Baird-1652.pdf
Disc 3\The Roman Schism Illustrated, From the Records of the Catholic Church-Arthur Perceval-1836.pdf
Disc 3\The Secret Fraternities of the Middle Ages-Americo Palfrey Marras-1865.pdf
Disc 3\The Secret Societies of All Ages and Countries-Charles William Heckethorn-1875.pdf
Disc 3\The Shores and Islands of the Mediterranean-Herery Christmas-1851.pdf
Disc 3\The Speaking Dead-Select Extracts From the Writings of Reformers-Benjamin Bradney Bockett-1882.pdf
Disc 3\The Spirit of the New Testament, Or The Revelation of the Mission of Christ-1885.pdf
Disc 3\The Spiritual Venality, Or Taxes of the Church of Rome-Indulgences of the Church of Rome-Joseph Mendham-1839.pdf
Disc 3\The Story of Bohemia-Frantiska Gregor-1896.pdf
Disc 3\The Templars in Cyprus-Fredrich Ludwig Werner-1886.pdf
Disc 3\The Testament of Ignatius Loyola-George Tyrrell-1900.pdf
Disc 3\The Theology of Christ From His Own Words-Joseph Parrish Thompson-1885.pdf
Disc 3\The Three Ages of Progress-Julius Emil Devos-1899.pdf
Disc 3\The Three Tribunals-Or The Vicarious Justification of Sinners-Robert Fitzgerald Collis-1856.pdf
Disc 3\The Travels of Pietro Della Valle in India-Pietro Della Valle-Edward Grey-1892.pdf
Disc 3\The Unsealed Prophecy Lectures on the Revelation of St. John-Robert Skeen-1857.pdf
Disc 3\The Venal Indulgences and Pardons of the Church of Rome-Joseph Mendham-1839.pdf
Disc 3\The Village Churchman-Rev. Joshua Fawcett-1843.pdf
Disc 3\The Waldenses Sketches of the Evangelical Christians of the Piedmont-Mitchell-1853.pdf
Disc 3\The Westminster Review-1865.pdf
Disc 3\The Whole Works of the Right Rev. Jeremy Taylor-Reginald Heber-1822.pdf
Disc 3\The Works in Verse and Prose (including Hitherto Unpublished MSS) of Sir John Davies-1876.pdf
Disc 3\The Works of Augustus M. Toplady-1825.pdf
Disc 3\The Works of Robert Trail-Robert Trail-1810.pdf
Disc 3\The Works of William Chillingworth-William Chillingworth-1838.pdf
Disc 3\The Writings of John Bradford-Bradford-Hooper-Townsend-1853.pdf
Disc 3\Traces of a Hidden Tradition in Masonry and Mdeiaeval Mysticism-Isabel Oakley-1900.pdf
Disc 3\Tracts for the Times, No.90-John Henry Newman-1841.pdf
Disc 3\Transubstantiation and the Sacrifice of the Mass-Three Sermons-Henry James Wharton-1867.pdf
Disc 3\Twelve Letters on Transubstantiation Containing Two Challenges to Dr.Cahill-James Carson-1853.pdf
Disc 3\Twelve Sermons-James Battersby-1881.pdf
Disc 3\Twelve Years in America-James Shaw-1867.pdf
Disc 3\Via Tuta-The Safe Way-Via Devia-The By Way–Humphrey Lynde-1819.pdf
Disc 3\-Voltaire-John Morley-1901.pdf
Disc 3\Wit and Wisdom of the Rev Sydney Smith-Evert Augustus Duyckinck-1856.pdf
Disc 4\.unwanted
Disc 4\1683-1920-The Fourteen Points-Frederick Franklin Schrader-1920.pdf
Disc 4\A Brief Plea for the Old Faith and the Old Times of Merrie England-Frank Fairplay-1846.pdf
Disc 4\A Catechism of the Articles of the Church of England-Frederick Owen-1852.pdf
Disc 4\A Collection of Sermons and Tracts-John Gill-1773.pdf
Disc 4\A Commentary Critical Exegetical and Doctrinal on St. Pauls Epistle to the Romans-George John Gwynne-1863.pdf
Disc 4\A Commentary on St Pauls Epistle to the Romans-Joseph Agar Beet-Paulus-1882.pdf
Disc 4\A Commentary on the Thirty-Nine Articles-Thomas Pownall Boultbee-1877.pdf
Disc 4\A Comparative View of the Doctrines and Confessions-Georg Benedikt Winer-William Burt Pope-1873.pdf
Disc 4\A Confession of Faith-Elders of the Church of the Colony of Connecticut-1810.pdf
Disc 4\A Defence of the Reformation-Jean Claude-Pierre Nicole-John Townsend-1815.pdf
Disc 4\A Discourse Concerning The True Import of the Words Election-Daniel Whitby-1816.pdf
Disc 4\A Discourse on the Life Character and Policy of Count Cavour-VinCenzo Botta-1862.pdf
Disc 4\A Few Days in Belgium and Holland-Maria Charlotte Lees-1872.pdf
Disc 4\A Glance at Revolutionized Italy-Charles Macfarlane-1849.pdf
Disc 4\A Handbook of Rome and its Environs John Murray-1875.pdf
Disc 4\A History of Popery With Specimens of Monkish Legends-1838.pdf
Disc 4\A History of Scottish Ecclesiastical and Civil Affairs-John Marshall-1859.pdf
Disc 4\A History of the Huguenots of the Dispersion at the Recall of the Edica of Nantes-Reginald Lane Poole-1880.pdf
Disc 4\A History of the Huguenots-William Carlos Martyn-1866.pdf
Disc 4\A History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages-Henry Charles Lea-1887.pdf
Disc 4\A History of the Jews in Rome BC160 to 604AD-Elizabeth Harriot Hudson-1882.pdf
Disc 4\A History of the Papacy From the Great Schism to the Sack of Rome-Mandell Creighton-1907.pdf
Disc 4\A History of the Peninsular War-Charles William Chadwick Oman-1902.pdf
Disc 4\A History of the Welsh Church to the Dissolution of the Monasteries-Ebenezer Josiah Newell-1895.pdf
Disc 4\A Kipling Primer-Frederic Lawrence Knowles-1899.pdf
Disc 4\A Lecture on the Protestant Reformation In 16th Century England-Robert Charleton-1863.pdf
Disc 4\A Life of Archbishop Laud-Thomas De Longueville-Romish Recusant-1894.pdf
Disc 4\A Manual of the History of Dogmas-Bernard John Otten-1922.pdf
Disc 4\A Plea for Religion and the Sacred Writings-David Simpson-1810.pdf
Disc 4\A School History of Modern Europe From the Reformation to the Fall on Napoleon-John Lord-1855.pdf
Disc 4\A Short and Easy Method With the Jews-Charles Leslie-1837.pdf
Disc 4\A Short History of the Church in Great Britian-William Holden Hutton-1900.pdf
Disc 4\A Short Scriptural Explication of the Faith and Doctrine of the Church of England-Thomas Rogers-1776.pdf
Disc 4\A Sketch of the Denominations of the Christian World-John Evans-1808.pdf
Disc 4\A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades House of Glasgow-George Crawfurd-1858.pdf
Disc 4\A Study of the Sects-William Henry Lyon-1891.pdf
Disc 4\A Summary of Divine Truths Professed by the Church of England-Robert Morefew-1711.pdf
Disc 4\A Treatise on Predestination, Election, and Grace-Walter Arthur Copinger-1889.pdf
Disc 4\A True Sincere and Modest Defence of English Catholics of 1584-William Allen-Francis Bourne-1914.pdf
Disc 4\A View of All Religions-Thomas Robbins-William Ward-1824.pdf
Disc 4\A Vindication of England’s Policy With Regards to the Opium Trade-Charles Reginald Haines-1884.pdf
Disc 4\A Vindication of the End of Religious Controversy-John Milner-Thomas Burgess-1825.pdf
Disc 4\A Volume of Divinity for Young Students-Lowry M’Clintock-1851.pdf
Disc 4\Abraham Lincoln and the Abolition of Slavery-Charles Godfrey Leland-1881.pdf
Disc 4\Account of the Lawsuit Instituted by a Roman Priest Against Rev. N.L. Rice-Nathan Rice-1837.pdf
Disc 4\Alfred an Epic Poem-Joseph Cottle-1850.pdf
Disc 4\Altar Sins, Or Historical Illustrations of the Eucharistic Errors of Rome-Edward Muscutt-1857.pdf
Disc 4\America and the New World-State-Norman Angell-1915.pdf
Disc 4\An Analysis of the History of the Reformation-William Henry Pinnock-1851.pdf
Disc 4\An Antidote Against Arminianism-Christopher Ness-1836.pdf
Disc 4\An Apology for Apostolic Order and Its Advocates-John Henry Hobart-1844.pdf
Disc 4\An Apology or the United Church of England and Ireland-William Eames-Benjamin William Mathias-1817.pdf
Disc 4\An Essay on Some Important Passages of the Revelation of the Apostle John-Lauchlan Taylor-1770.pdf
Disc 4\An Index of Dates-Willoughby Rosse-John Blair-1859.pdf
Disc 4\An Index of Prohibited Books by Command of Gregory XVI in 1835-Joseph Mendham-1840.pdf
Disc 4\An Inquiry Into the Principles of Church Authority-Robert Issac Wilberforce-1854.pdf
Disc 4\An Introduction to the History of the Principal States of Europe-Samuel Pufendorf-1764.pdf
Disc 4\An Introduction to the Theology of the Church of England-Thomas Pownall Boultbee-1871.pdf
Disc 4\Ancient Christianity and the Doctrines of the Oxford Tracts for the Times-Isaac Taylor-1840.pdf
Disc 4\Ancient Pagan Tombs and Christian Cemeteries in the Islands of Malta-A.A. Caruana-1898.pdf
Disc 4\Antisemitism-Its History and Causes-Bernard Lazare-1903.pdf
Disc 4\Aonio Paleario From the French-Jules Bonnet-1864.pdf
Disc 4\Are Not the Clergy Arraying Themselves Against Church and Queen-M.A.-1848.pdf
Disc 4\Bacon The Advancement of LearningFrancis Bacon-William Aldis Wright-1876.pdf
Disc 4\Bernardino Ochino of Siena-Karl Benrath-1876.pdf
Disc 4\Bible Myths and Their Parallels in Other Religions-Thomas William Doane -1884.pdf
Disc 4\Brownsons Defence-Orestes Augustus Brownson-1840.pdf
Disc 4\Cabot’s Discovery of North America-George Edward Weare-1897.pdf
Disc 4\Calvinistic Controversy-Wilbur Smith-1880.pdf
Disc 4\Catholic Belief-Joseph Faa Di Bruno-1878.pdf
Disc 4\Chambers Miscellany of Instructive and Entertaining Tracts-Chambers-1869.pdf
Disc 4\Chapters From the Religious History of Spain Connected With the Inquisitition-Henry Charles Lea-1890.pdf
Disc 4\Characteristics of the Romish Church-B. Willard Archer-1904.pdf
Disc 4\Christian Dogmatics-Hans Martensen-William Urwick-1866.pdf
Disc 4\Christian Truth Explained in Familiar Letters on the Tenents of the Church-Charles Powlett-1824.pdf
Disc 4\Christianity in History-James Bartlet-Alexander James Carlyle-1917.pdf
Disc 4\Church and State in Early Maryland-George Petie-1892.pdf
Disc 4\Church and State in England to the Death of Queen Anne-Henry Melvill Gwatkin-1917.pdf
Disc 4\Church Finance and Social Ethics-Francis John McConnell-1920.pdf
Disc 4\Colloquia Peripatetica-Deep Sea Soundings Being Conversations-William Angus Knight-1879.pdf
Disc 4\Creeds and Religious Beliefs as They Appear to a Plain Businessman-John Savage Hawley-1900.pdf
Disc 4\Cromwell as a Soldier-Thomas Stanford Baldock-Walter Haweis James-1899.pdf
Disc 4\Cromwell in Ireland-Denis Murphy-1897.pdf
Disc 4\Cromwell-Esse Virginia Hathaway-1912.pdf
Disc 4\Despotism Or The Fall of the Jesuits-Isaac Disraeli-1811.pdf
Disc 4\Diderot and the Encyclopedists-John Morley-1878.pdf
Disc 4\Discourses Addressed to Mixed Congregations-John Henry Newman-1881.pdf
Disc 4\Discourses on Various Subjects and Occasions-Robert South-1827.pdf
Disc 4\Dr Wiseman’s Popish Literary Blunders Exposed-Charles Hastings Collette-1860.pdf
Disc 4\Elsie-A Story of the Civil War-S.M.M.X.-1896.pdf
Disc 4\Englands Case Against Home Rule-Albert Venn Dicey-1886.pdf
Disc 4\Essays Chiefly on Questions of Church and State-Arthur Penrhyn Stanley-1884.pdf
Disc 4\Essays in Fury-Arthur D. Lewis-1904.pdf
Disc 4\Faith and Free Thought-Christian Evidence Society-1872.pdf
Disc 4\Faith, Or Fear-William A. Hankey(Student in Arms)-1916.pdf
Disc 4\Familiar Letters to John B Fitzpatrick-Bishop of Boston-1854.pdf
Disc 4\First Establishment of the Faith in New France-Chrestien Le Clercq-1882.pdf
Disc 4\Florentine HistoryHenry Edward Napier-1847.pdf
Disc 4\Foreknowledge is God’s Prescience Eternal and Universal-Miles Grant-1896.pdf
Disc 4\Fountains of Papal Rome-Rudolph Ruzicka-1915.pdf
Disc 4\Four Essays on Theological Subjects-Edward Ash-1864.pdf
Disc 4\France-It’s History and Revolutions-William Chambers-1873.pdf
Disc 4\George Calvert and Cecilius Calvert-William Hand Browne-1890.pdf
Disc 4\Governor Thomas H.Hicks of Maryland and the Civil War-George Lovic Pierce Radcliffe-1901.pdf
Disc 4\Gypsies,Some Curious Investigations-John Watts De Peyster-1887.pdf
Disc 4\Handbook to the Controversy With Rome-Karl August von Hase-1906.pdf
Disc 4\Henry Beyle Otherwise de Stendahl-Andrew Archibald Paton-1874.pdf
Disc 4\Henry of Navarre and the Huguenots in France-Paul Ferdinand Willert-1893.pdf
Disc 4\Hippolytus and The Doctrine and Practice of the Church of Rome-Christian Carl Bunsen-1854.pdf
Disc 4\Historical Tales the Romance of Reality-Charles Morris-1893.pdf
Disc 4\History of India-Abraham Jackson-Romesh Dutt-1906.pdf
Disc 4\History of Latin Christianity-Henry Hart Milman-1881.pdf
Disc 4\History of Roman Literature from Its Earliest Period to the Augustan Age-John Colin Dunlop-1827.pdf
Disc 4\History of Scotland-Patrick Fraser Tytler-1831.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Atonement Controversy-Andrew Robertson-1846.pdf
Disc 4\History of the City of Rome in the Middle Ages-Ferdinand Gregorovius-1900.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science-John William Draper-1875.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Counter Revolution in England-Armand Carrel-1857.pdf
Disc 4\History of the First Council of Nice-Dean Dudley-1880.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Protestant Church in Hungary-Merle d’Aubigne-1854.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Protestants of France-P.E.Barnes-Guillaume de Felice-1853.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Revolutions in Europe-Christope Koch-Frederic Schoell-1851.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Rise ofthe Huguenots of France-Henry Martyn Baird-1889.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Society of Jesus to the Present Time-JMS Daurignac-1865.pdf
Disc 4\History of the Sodalities of the Blessed Virgin Mary-Louis Delplace-1884.pdf
Disc 4\Homiletical Commentary on the Book of Job-Thomas Robinson-1876.pdf
Disc 4\Ireland as a Kingdom and a Colony-Borohme Brian-1843.pdf
Disc 4\Italian Sights and Papal Principles-James Jackson Jarves-1856.pdf
Disc 4\Jewish Contributions to Civilization-Joseph Jacobs-1920.pdf
Disc 4\Jewish Questions-Three Lectures-Ignaz Zollschan-1914.pdf
Disc 4\John Marmaduke-A Romance of the English Invasion of Ireland in 1649-Samuel Harden Church-1903.pdf
Disc 4\Junipero Serra-The Man and His Work-Abigail Hetzel Fitch-1914.pdf
Disc 4\King and Parliament A D 1603-1714-George Henry Wakeling-1896.pdf
Disc 4\Knights and Their Days-John Doran-1856.pdf
Disc 4\Land of Idols, Or Talks With Young People About India-John J. Pool-1894.pdf
Disc 4\Landmarks in the History of Early Christianity-Kirsopp Lake-1922.pdf
Disc 4\Lecture on Beranger the French Lyric Poet-John Thomas Rowland-1858.pdf
Disc 4\Lectures of Certain High Church Principles-Thomas Madge-1844.pdf
Disc 4\Lectures on Divine Sovereignty, Election-George Payne-1836.pdf
Disc 4\Lectures on Romanism-Joseph F. Berg-1840.pdf
Disc 4\Lectures on Some of the Articles of Faith of the Church of England-Robert Dillon-1835.pdf
Disc 4\Lectures on the Gospel According to Luke-James Foote-1849.pdf
Disc 4\Lectures, Addresses and Other Literary Remains-Frederick William Robertson-1876.pdf
Disc 4\Letters From Italy and Switzerland-Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy-1863.pdf
Disc 4\Letters From Portugal and Spain-Moving ArmiesAdam Neale, Duke of Arthur Wellesley Wellington-1809.pdf
Disc 4\Letters From Rome to Friends in England-Burgon John William-1862.pdf
Disc 4\Life and Writings of Joseph Mazzini-Giuseppe Mazzini-1890.pdf
Disc 4\Life of Saint Edmund of Canterbury-Wilfrid Wallace-1893.pdf
Disc 4\Life of Saint Philip Neri-Anne Hope-Filippo Neri-1859.pdf
Disc 4\Light and Truth-Robert Benjamin Lewis-1844.pdf
Disc 4\Lives of the Necromancers-William Godwin-1835.pdf
Disc 4\Luther the Reformer-Charles Ebert Hay-1898.pdf
Disc 4\Luther Vindicated-Charles Hastings Collette-1884.pdf
Disc 4\Lutheranism in America-William Julius Mann-1857.pdf
Disc 4\Maryland During the English Civil Wars-Aaron Morton Sakoloski-1906.pdf
Disc 4\Maryland-History of a Palintate-William Hand Browne-1904.pdf
Disc 4\Mediaeval Popes, Emperors, Kings and Crusaders-M.M. Busk-1856.pdf
Disc 4\Medieval Europe From 395 to 1270-Charles Bemont-1903.pdf
Disc 4\Memoirs Illustrating the History of Napoleon 1st From 1802 to 1815-Claude-Francois Meneval-1894.pdf
Disc 4\Memoirs of Maximilian de Bethune Duke of Sully-de Bethune-1812.pdf
Disc 4\Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Edward Gibbon-Oliver Farrar Emerson-1898.pdf
Disc 4\Memoirs of the Reverend William Legg-George Colborne-William Legg-1871.pdf
Disc 4\Memorials of the Huguenots in America-Ammon Stapleton-1901.pdf
Disc 4\Men and Women of the Italian Reformation-Christpher Hare-1914.pdf
Disc 4\Mexico in Peace and War-Thomas Herbert Russell-1914.pdf
Disc 4\Military and Religious Life in the Middle Ages-P.L. Jacob-1874.pdf
Disc 4\Monastic London-Walter Stanhope-1887.pdf
Disc 4\Morning Exercises at Cripplegate-London St. Giles-James Nichols-1844.pdf
Disc 4\Narrative of a Tour Taken in the Year 1667 to La Grande-Claude Lancelot-1813.pdf
Disc 4\Narratives of Early Maryland 1633-1684-Clayton Colman Hall-1910.pdf
Disc 4\Neutrality in Time of Danger to the Church-Henry Handley Norris-1835.pdf
Disc 4\New Commentaries on the Laws of England-Henry John Stephen-1863.pdf
Disc 4\New Englander and Yale Review-Edward Royall Tyler-1844.pdf
Disc 4\Notes of Cases in the Ecclesiastical Maritime Courts-Great Britian-Thomas Thornton-1850.pdf
Disc 4\Notes on the Canons of the First Four General Councils-William Bright-1882.pdf
Disc 4\Observations on the Mortmain Laws, Act of Supremacy-James Lord-1837.pdf
Disc 4\Old Rome and New Italy-Emilio Castelar-Robert Arnold-1873.pdf
Disc 4\Oliver Cromwell and His Times-Thomas Cromwell-1822.pdf
Disc 4\Oliver Cromwell-The Man and His Mission-James Allanson Picton-1883.pdf
Disc 4\Orthodoxy-It’s Truths and Errors-James Freeman Clarke-1880.pdf
Disc 4\Outlines of General History-William Francis Collier-1868.pdf
Disc 4\Papers on Inter-Racial Problems-Gustav Spiller-1911.pdf
Disc 4\Papers on the Southern Spanish Colonies of America-Bernard Moses-1911.pdf
Disc 4\Pastors Their Rights and Duties According to the New Code of Canon Law-Charles Joseph Koudelka-1921.pdf
Disc 4\Peter the Great Emperor of Russia-Eugene Schuyler-1884.pdf
Disc 4\Phases of Faith, or Passages From the History of My Creed-Francis William Newman-Rationalist Association-1907.pdf
Disc 4\Pilgrim Life in the Middle Ages-Sidney Smith-1912.pdf
Disc 4\Pioneer Priests of North America 1642 1710-Thomas Joseph Campbell-1910.pdf
Disc 4\Poland-Dionysius Lardner-1831.pdf
Disc 4\Popery and Jesuitism at Rome in the 19th Century-Luigi Francesco Desanctis-1852.pdf
Disc 4\Popery in the Ascendant Sufferings of the English Protestant Martyrs-1555-Thomas Smith-1839.pdf
Disc 4\Popery not Catholicism Six Lectures on Ifallibility-Benjamin William Mathias-1851.pdf
Disc 4\Popery, The Inquisition and The Jesuits-E.K. Pickering-1851.pdf
Disc 4\Portraiture of Lutheranism-Samuel Simon Schmucker-1840.pdf
Disc 4\Posthumous Sermons–Henry Blunt-John Brown-1854.pdf
Disc 4\Predestination and Election Considered Scripturally-William Merry-1843.pdf
Disc 4\Presbyterianism Three Hundred Years Ago-1872.pdf
Disc 4\Primitive Doctrine of Election-George Stanley Faber-1836.pdf
Disc 4\Prize Essay Christianity and Infidelity-Sara Sophia Hennell-1857.pdf
Disc 4\Proceedings of the Huguenot Society of London-1898.pdf
Disc 4\Protestantism and Infidelity-Francis Xavier Weninger-1863.pdf
Disc 4\Queen Elizabeth-Mandell Creighton-1899.pdf
Disc 4\Ralph’s Year in Russia-Robert Richardson-1882.pdf
Disc 4\Readings Upon The Liturgy and Other Divine Offices-John Bate Cardale-1851.pdf
Disc 4\Reason and Faith Theoretical Claims and Conflicts-Henry Rogers-1850.pdf
Disc 4\Records of Buckinghamshire-1870.pdf
Disc 4\Reflections and Suggestions on the Present State of Parties-An Old Clay Whig-1856.pdf
Disc 4\Reflections on the Four Principal Religions-David Williamson-1824.pdf
Disc 4\Relatio Itineris in Marylandiam-Andrew White-William McSherry-Jesuits-1874.pdf
Disc 4\Religion Under the Barons of Baltimore-Charles Ernest Smith-1899.pdf
Disc 4\Remarks on the Progress of Popery-Edward Bickersteth-1836.pdf
Disc 4\Remarks on Two Pamphlets Lately Published Against Dr. Middleton-1748.pdf
Disc 4\Renaissance in Italy-The Catholic Reaction-John Addington Symonds-1887.pdf
Disc 4\Revolutionary Europe, 1789-1815-Henry Morse Stephens-1907.pdf
Disc 4\Rome in Canada-Charles Lindsay-1877.pdf
Disc 4\Romish Rites, Offices and Legends- Or Authorised Superstitions-M.W. Foye-1856.pdf
Disc 4\Romish Tyranny-Or The Tactics of Priests and Agents Exposed-Henry Galloway Gill-1868.pdf
Disc 4\Scientific Tracts-1832.pdf
Disc 4\Scotlands Free Church-George Ryley-John MacGregoe McCandish-1893.pdf
Disc 4\Scriptural Predestination not Fatalism-Henry Bleby-1853.pdf
Disc 4\Sermons on Various Subjects Evangelical, Devotional and Practical-Joseph Lathrop-1810.pdf
Disc 4\Servetus and Calvin-Robert Willis-1877.pdf
Disc 4\Sketches of the True Genius of Popery by a Protestant Nonconformist-Noel Welman-1852.pdf
Disc 4\Spain-It’s Greatness and Decay-Martin Andrew Sharp Hume-1905.pdf
Disc 4\Spanish and Portuguese South America During the Colonial Period-Robert Grant Watson-1884.pdf
Disc 4\Syllabus of Continental European History From the fall of Rome to 1870-Oliver Huntington Richardson-1904.pdf
Disc 4\The Age of Elizabeth-Mandell Creighton-1889.pdf
Disc 4\The Age of Revolution-William Holden Hutton-1908.pdf
Disc 4\The American Lutheran Church-Samuel Simon Schmucker-1852.pdf
Disc 4\The Anatomy of the Mass-Pierre Du Moulin-Robert Shanks-1833.pdf
Disc 4\The Antiquities of the Anglo Saxon Church-John Lingard-1851.pdf
Disc 4\The Aspects of Religion in the United States of America-Isabella Lucy Bird-1859.pdf
Disc 4\The Beast and His Image-The Pope and the Council of Trent-Frederic Fysh-1837.pdf
Disc 4\The British and Foreign Evangelical Review-James Dykes-1883.pdf
Disc 4\The Cambridge and Saybrook Platforms of Church Discipline Adopted in 1648-Cambridge Synod-1829.pdf
Disc 4\The Catechism and Prayer Book-John Pilkington Norris-1882.pdf
Disc 4\The Catholic Faith-A manual for the Members of the Church of England-William Henry Griffith Thomas-1920.pdf
Disc 4\The Censorship of Hebrew Books-William Popper-1899.pdf
Disc 4\The Church and the Churches, The Papacy and Temporial Power-Johann Joseph von Dollinger-William MacCabe-1862.pdf
Disc 4\The Church of England a True Branch of the Holy Catholic Church-Leicester Darwll-H. Eugene Egan-1853.pdf
Disc 4\The Church of England and Common Sense-Harry Jones-1864.pdf
Disc 4\The Church of England and Other Religious Communions-Robert Howard-1885.pdf
Disc 4\The Church of Rome-Robert James M’Ghee-1853.pdf
Disc 4\The Church of the Redeemer-Samuel Simon Schmucker-1868.pdf
Disc 4\The Claims of Rome-Samuel Smith-1897.pdf
Disc 4\The Confessions of Faith and Catechisms of the Church of Scotland-1764.pdf
Disc 4\The Constitutional History and Constitution of the Church of England-Felix Makower-1895.pdf
Disc 4\The Contest With Rome-Julius Charles Hare-1852.pdf
Disc 4\The Conversion of the Northern Nations-Charles Merivale-1866.pdf
Disc 4\The Counter Reformation in Europe-Arthur Robert Pennington-1899.pdf
Disc 4\The Court and Times of James the First-Thomas Birch-Robert Folkestone Williams-1849.pdf
Disc 4\The Dark Ages 476-918-Charles William Chadwick Oman-1908.pdf
Disc 4\The Dark Ages-Samuel Roffey Maitland-1853.pdf
Disc 4\The Dawn of the Constitution-James Henry Ramsay-1908.pdf
Disc 4\The Days of Queen Mary-George Stokes-1843.pdf
Disc 4\The Definitions of Faith-William Andrew Hammond-1844.pdf
Disc 4\The Divine Rule of Faith and Practice-William Goode-1842.pdf
Disc 4\The Doctrinal Harmony of the New Testament Exemplified-Edward William Grinfield-1836.pdf
Disc 4\The Doctrine of Justification by Faith Only-Charles Milman Mount-John Henry Browne-1827.pdf
Disc 4\The Doctrines of Predestination Reprobation and Election-Robert Wallace-1880.pdf
Disc 4\The Duties of the Parish Priest a Course of Lectures-John James Blunt-1858.pdf
Disc 4\The Duty of the Church in Times of Trial-Julius Charles Hare-1848.pdf
Disc 4\The Early Franciscans & Jesuits-Arthur Savile Beresford Freer-1922.pdf
Disc 4\The Early Kings of Norway-Thomas Carlyle-1878.pdf
Disc 4\The Early Teutonic, Italian and French Masters-Robert Dohme-Augustus Keane-1879.pdf
Disc 4\The Ecclesiastical and Political History of the Popes of Rome-Leopold Ranke-Sarah Austin-1840.pdf
Disc 4\The Elocutionist-Johnathan Barber-1836.pdf
Disc 4\The English Church in the Reigns of Elizabeth and James 1st.-1558-1625-Walter Howard Frere-1904.pdf
Disc 4\The English in Ireland in the Eighteenth Century-James Anthony Proude-1874.pdf
Disc 4\The English Reformation of the Sixteenth Century-William Henry Beckett-1890.pdf
Disc 4\The Epistles to the Colossians and to the Ephesians-Gross Alexander-1910.pdf
Disc 4\The Faith and Practise of Thirty Congregations-1651-Baptist Confession of Faith-1901.pdf
Disc 4\The Faith of the Gospel-Arthur James Mason-1889.pdf
Disc 4\The Fathers of the English Church-Legh Richmond-1812.pdf
Disc 4\The First Part of An Equal Check to Pharisaism and Antinomianism-John Wesley-John Fletcher-1774.pdf
Disc 4\The Fourteen of Meaux an Account of the Earliest Reformed Church-Herbert Morris Bower-1894.pdf
Disc 4\The French Revolution of 1848, Its Economic Aspect-John Arthur Ransome Marriot-1913.pdf
Disc 4\The French Revolution-Thomas Carlyle-1872.pdf
Disc 4\The Friendly Disputants Concerning Future Punishments-Mary Catherine Irvine-1856.pdf
Disc 4\The Gentile and the Jew in the Courts of the Temple of Christ-Johann Joseph von Dollinger-1862.pdf
Disc 4\The Glories of the Catholic Church-Richard Challoner-Henry Brann-1895.pdf
Disc 4\The Golden Bough, A Study of Religion and Magic-James George Frazer-1919.pdf
Disc 4\The Gospel Visitant-Edward Turner-1812.pdf
Disc 4\The Greek Church-Proposals for Christian Union-Emest Silvanius Appleyard-1851.pdf
Disc 4\The Hand of God in History, or Divine Providence Historically Illustrated-Hollis Read-1855.pdf
Disc 4\The Harleian Miscellany-A Collection of Pamphlets and Tracts-John Malham-1810.pdf
Disc 4\The Heroes of Europe-Henry Gay Hewlett-1861.pdf
Disc 4\The Historicl Basis of Modern Europe-760 AD-1815 AD-Archibald Weir-1886.pdf
Disc 4\The History of Aberdeen-Walter Thom-1837.pdf
Disc 4\The History of Dissenters From 1608-1808-David Bogue-James Bennett-1812.pdf
Disc 4\The History of Drogheda-John D’Alton-1844.pdf
Disc 4\The History of Europe From 1862 to 1914-Lucius Holt-Alexander Chilton-1918.pdf
Disc 4\The History of Mary Queen of Scots-Francois Augusta Mignet-1851.pdf
Disc 4\The History of Normandy and of England-Fancis Palgrave-1851.pdf
Disc 4\The History of Sacerdotal Celibacy in the Christian Church-Henry Charles Lea-1907.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Church of Christ From the Diet of Augsburg to the 18th Century-Henry Stebbing-1839.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Church of Christ-John Scott-Joseph Milner-1829.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Church of Malabar-Michael Geddes-1694.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Council of Florence-I.N. Ostroumov-Trans. by B. Popoff-1906.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Holy Military Sovereign Order of St. John of Jerusalem-John Taaffe-1852.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Inquisition of Spain-Jaun Antonio Llorente-1843.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Popes-Ludwig Pastor-1908.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Primitive Yankees-William Macon Coleman-1881.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England-Edward Hyde Clarendon-William Warburton-1826.pdf
Disc 4\The History of the Society of Jesus-Alexander Wilmot-1884.pdf
Disc 4\The Holy Christian Church From Its Remote Origins-Robert Matteson Johnston-1912.pdf
Disc 4\The Huguenot Galley Slave-Jean Marteilhe-1867.pdf
Disc 4\The Huguenots and Henry of Navarre-Henry Martyn Baird-1886.pdf
Disc 4\The Huguenots and the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes-Henry Martyn Baird-1895.pdf
Disc 4\The Huguenots, Their Settlements Churches and Industries-Samuel Smiles-1868.pdf
Disc 4\The Imagery of Foreign Travel-Joseph Moyle Sherer-1882.pdf
Disc 4\The International Jew-The World’s Foremost Problem-Henry Ford-1921.pdf
Disc 4\The Japanese Empire-S.B.Kemish-1860.pdf
Disc 4\The Jesuits and Other Essays-Henry Willis Probyn-Nevins-1874.pdf
Disc 4\The Jesuits in North America in the 17th Century-Francis Parkman-1877.pdf
Disc 4\The Jesuits-An Examination of the Origins of the Society of Jesus-William Waterworth-1852.pdf
Disc 4\The Jesuits-Henry Isaac Roper-1848.pdf
Disc 4\The Jewish Question and the Key to Its Solution-Max Green-1908.pdf
Disc 4\The Jewish Question and the Mission of the Jews-Charles Waldstein-1894.pdf
Disc 4\The Jewish Question-Arno Clemens Gaebelein-1912.pdf
Disc 4\The Jewish Spectre-George Henry Warner-1905.pdf
Disc 4\The Jews of Asia-Sidney Mendelssohn-1920.pdf
Disc 4\The Kingdom of Christ and the Errors of Romanism-Richard Whately-1847.pdf
Disc 4\The Kingdom of Christ Delineated in Two Essays-Richard Whately-1859.pdf
Disc 4\The Land of Sinim-Missionary in China-1845.pdf
Disc 4\The Latin Church During Anglo Saxon Times-Henry Soames-1848.pdf
Disc 4\The Life and Pontificate of Saint Pius the Fifth-Joseph Mendham-1832.pdf
Disc 4\The Life of Dr John Colet-Samuel Knight-1823.pdf
Disc 4\The Life of Martin Luther-Julius Kostlin-John Gottlieb Morris-1883.pdf
Disc 4\The Life of Oliver Cromwell-Joel Tyler Headley-1848.pdf
Disc 4\The Life of Prince Otto Von Bismarck-Frank Preston Stearns-1899.pdf
Disc 4\The Life of Willbur Fisk-Joseph Holdich-1842.pdf
Disc 4\The Literary Policy of the Church of Rome Exhibited-Joseph Menham-1830.pdf
Disc 4\The Lives of the Fathers Martyrs and Other Principle Saints-Alban Butler-1821.pdf
Disc 4\The Lollards-George Stokes-Religious Tract Society-1838.pdf
Disc 4\The Lords Baltimore and the Maryland Palatinate-Clayton Colman Hall-1902.pdf
Disc 4\The Lord’s Supper a Feast After Sacrifice-James Booth-Jas Booth-1870.pdf
Disc 4\The Lutheran Movement of the Sixteenth Century-David Henry Bauslin-1919.pdf
Disc 4\The Marching of the Lodges-William Archer-1869.pdf
Disc 4\The Miscellaneous Works of the Late Reverend Conyers Middleton-1755.pdf
Disc 4\The Moderate Cabal-Luke Milbourne-1710.pdf
Disc 4\The Modern Jew-Arnold White-1899.pdf
Disc 4\The Mysteries of Popery Unveiled-Inquisition at Lisbon-John Coustos-Antonio Gavin-1820.pdf
Disc 4\The Mysteries of the Vatican or Crimes of the Papacy-Karl Theodor Griesinger-1864.pdf
Disc 4\The Neutralization of States-Clair Francis Little-1921.pdf
Disc 4\The New Jerusalem Magazine and Theological Inspector-1828.pdf
Disc 4\The Old World and the New-Orville Dewey-1844.pdf
Disc 4\The Papacy and the Civil Power-Richard Wiggington Thompson-1876.pdf
Disc 4\The Papacy of Modern Times-Scottish Protestant Alliance-1887.pdf
Disc 4\The Papal Conspiracy Exposed and Protestantism Defended-Edward Beecher-1855.pdf
Disc 4\The Papal Hierarchy-James Aitken Wylie-1878.pdf
Disc 4\The Pillar and Foundation of Truth-Roman Catholic Church-Giovanni Battista Pagani-1870.pdf
Disc 4\The Place Where Prayer Was Wont to be Made-John Mason Neale-1844.pdf
Disc 4\The Popes and the Jesuits of the Present Century-Edward Henery Michelsen-1860.pdf
Disc 4\The Popular History of England-Charles Knight-1857.pdf
Disc 4\The Prelatical Doctrine of Apostolical Succession Examined-Thomas Smyth-1841.pdf
Disc 4\The Priest and the Huguenot-Felix Bungener-1853.pdf
Disc 4\The Progress of Religious Sentiment-Joseph Adshead-1852.pdf
Disc 4\The Progress of the Intellect-Robert William Mackay-1850.pdf
Disc 4\The Protector-Oliver Cromwell-A Vindication-Jean Henri Merle d’Aubigne-1848.pdf
Disc 4\The Protestant Advocate-A Review of Puplications Relating to the Roman Church-1812.pdf
Disc 4\The Puritans and Queen Elizabeth-Samuel Hopkins-1875.pdf
Disc 4\The Reformation-George Park Fisher-1917.pdf
Disc 4\The Religion of Jesus Compared With the Christianity of Today-Frederick Altona Binney-1877.pdf
Disc 4\The Religious Development in the Province of North Carolina-Stephen Beauregard Weeks-1899.pdf
Disc 4\The Rise of the Spanish Empire in the Old World and the New-Roger Bigelow Merriman-1918.pdf
Disc 4\The Roman Catholic Church and Its Relation to the Federal Government-Francis T. Morton-1909.pdf
Disc 4\The Roman Catholic Question-George Anthony Denison-1851.pdf
Disc 4\The Roman Exile-Guglielmo Gajani-1856.pdf
Disc 4\The Roman Republic of 1849-Theodore Dwight-1851.pdf
Disc 4\The Roman State-Luigi Carlo Farini-William Gladstone-1852.pdf
Disc 4\The Russian Clergy-Ivan Segejewitch Gagarin-1872.pdf
Disc 4\The Sacramental Week-Or Young Communicants Assistant-Thomas Webster-1833.pdf
Disc 4\The Secret History of the Oxford Movement-Walter Walsh-1899.pdf
Disc 4\The Secrets of the Vatican-Douglas Brooke Wheelton Sladen-1907.pdf
Disc 4\The Society of Jesus From the Foundation of the Order to It’s Suppression in1773-Robert Simth-1872.pdf
Disc 4\The Story of St John Baptist-De La Salle-Francis Meehan-1921.pdf
Disc 4\The Struggle for Christian Truth in Italy-Giovanni Luzzi-1913.pdf
Disc 4\The Student and Intellectual Observer(Devils of Loudon)-1871.pdf
Disc 4\The Sultan and the Powers-Malcolm MacColl-1896.pdf
Disc 4\The Supremacy Question Considered in It’s Successive Phases-George Edward Biber-1865.pdf
Disc 4\The Tombs of the Popes-Ferdinand Gregorovius-1903.pdf
Disc 4\The True Doctrine of the Holy Eucharist-James Taylor Robert Wilberforce-1855.pdf
Disc 4\The True Organization of the New Church, as Indicated in the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg-Francois Charles Fourier-1848.pdf
Disc 4\The United Irishmen Their Lives and Times-Richard Robert Madden-1842.pdf
Disc 4\The Usage of the Church in Closing the Morning Service With a Sermon-William James-1845.pdf
Disc 4\The Variations of Popery-Samuel Edgar-1855.pdf
Disc 4\The Vatican Council and Its Definitions-Henry Edward Manning-1870.pdf
Disc 4\The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576-James Westfall Thompson-1909.pdf
Disc 4\The Works of Lord Morley-John Morley-1921.pdf
Disc 4\The Works of Richard Hooker Prefaced by Life of Author-1807.pdf
Disc 4\Theology as an Empirical Science-Douglas Clyde Macintosh-1919.pdf
Disc 4\Time-A Monthly Magazine-Edmund Hodgson Yeats-1886.pdf
Disc 4\Times of Refreshing to the Church of Christ-Robert Meek-1860.pdf
Disc 4\To Rome and Back-John Moore Capes-1873.pdf
Disc 4\Tracts and Other Papers, Including Andrew White’s Voyage to the Colonies-Peter Force-1846.pdf
Disc 4\Travels in France and Germany in 1865 and 1866-Edmund Spencer-1866.pdf
Disc 4\Ukraine on the Road to Freedom-Ukrainian National Committee of the U.S.-1919.pdf
Disc 4\Unsectarian Notes on Free Will- Justification by Faith-Richard Herring-1885.pdf
Disc 4\View of the State of Europe During the Middle Ages-Henry Hallam-1840.pdf
Disc 4\Walks in Rome-Augustus John Cuthbert Hare-1897.pdf
Disc 4\Warrior, Priest, Statesman-English Heroes in the 13th Century-1873.pdf

Advertisements
28 February, 2017

Shocking revelation about the Catholic-Islamic connection

Or how does the Vatican control Islam and the muslims.

Is the end goal to get rid of all Christians and Jews (whether apostate or not, zionist or not, satanist or not) using Catholics, Muslims, and other religions before ushering the open world religion of Satanism in a Communist world headed by the antichrist serving Lucifer?

The Islamic Connection by Walter Veith.
The Shrine, ISIS, the Holy See (Vatican), etc.

Now, think again what you want on this flat Earth.
Happiness, free speech, free thinking and the right to worship our father Jehovah?Or raising hell from the abyss with torment from the demons and enslavement, torture and sacrifice to Lucifer / Satan?

Pray to Jehovah, read the KJV Bible 1611,  share and spread the truth, fight for your freedom, learn how to defend yourself (legal and lethal), learn how to live with very little (preparedness, survival skills), help the other man.

25 October, 2014

Gandhi derrière le masque : L’apôtre de la non-violence a fait 500’000 morts

British Raj (Empire of India) flag

Tous les hommes politiques présentés comme des saints par les médias doivent être regardés avec beaucoup de suspicion. Qu’ils se nomment Barack Obama, l’Abbé Pierre, Che Guevara ou Sœur Thérésa, leur image est presque systématiquement utilisée par les forces noires comme un panneau de lumière cachant de sombres intérêts. En guise d’exemple, nous publions un extrait du livre d’Alain Daniélou, Histoire de l’Inde, concernant Ghandi, «l’apôtre de la non-violence» qui a été responsable de la mort d’un demi-million d’hindous.

[…]

Prenant prétexte des émeutes qu’il avait lui-même organisées, le gouvernement britannique proposa une division de l’Inde, entre le Pakistan musulman et une Inde hindoue (Bharat). Ce qui fut accepté par Gandhi et par le Congrès, malgré l’opposition de tous les éléments modérés, hindous et musulmans.
En mettant sur le même plan l’Inde et le Pakistan, l’Angleterre divisait le continent entre un État laïc multireligieux, où les droits des citoyens étaient définis par des lois modernes, et un État théocratique – le Pakistan – où seule était admise la loi coranique qui ne reconnaît aucun droit aux non-musulmans et fait de leur meurtre une vertu. Les partis hindous ne furent jamais consultés par Nehru – qui était agnostique – et Gandhi, cet illuminé réformiste qui ne représentait en rien la population hindoue.
Le déguisement de Gandhi en saint homme fut un masque habilement utilisé pour faire croire au monde qu’il représentait les hindous. […]

Source : Gandhi derrière le masque L’apôtre de la non-violence a fait 500’000 morts http://www.crom.be/fr/documents/gandhi-derriere-le-masque

16 October, 2014

Mary Rodwell – The New Humans (crystals, indigo and star children)

Mary Rodwell - The New Humans (crystals, indigo and star children) www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnykIjX4lSE

Mary Rodwell – The New Humans (crystals, indigo and star children)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnykIjX4lSE

 

27 September, 2014

Jack Lang et Pierre Moscovici “l’affaire de la péniche” à Paris (viol d’enfant en réunion, suivi de mort)

On en decouvre tous les jours, pour peut qu’on cherche. Cette horreur dont je n’etais pas au fait, inclus deux des stars  du Parti Socialiste francais, qui comme tous les politiciens sont des bons a riens, des satanistes, violeurs et assassins d’enfants (et hommes et femmes), des voleurs, des menteurs, des mignons de leur stupide maitre lucifer.

Lectrice, lecteur, n’oubliez jamais que ces “affaires” ne sont meme pas le millieme des faits. Les disparitions d’adulte et d’enfants n’ont probablement jamais ete aussi nombreuses… et on nous passe les details sur le cannibalisme et le reste.

La vidéo fait le buzz depuis quelques jours, mais elle est en ligne depuis le mois de juin 2011.Dans ladite vidéo qui a été postée sur Youtube, un père, qui se fait appeler Emmanuel Verdin, explique qu’il a porté plainte contre Jack Lang, pour la 2e fois, pour la mémoire de sa fille.

Il explique dans une vidéo très courte et mal coupée, que Jack lang a violé sa fille de 4 ans entre 1999 et 2001. Les faits se seraient produits sur une péniche qui aurait appartenu à un député du Var, mise à quai à Paris, aujourd’hui face à la tour Eiffel et baptisée le Makaï. 50 personnes peuvent y festoyer sans problème, et ladite péniche est aujourd’hui louée pour des évènements.

Emmanuel Verdin explique que son ex, la mère de sa fille Laureen, fréquentait des personnes qui connaissaient Jack Lang pour l’avoir accompagné lors de voyages pédophiles, notamment au Maroc et en Thaïlande. C’est assez intéressant, car les affaires qui n’existent pas concernant Jack lang au Maroc datent précisément de cette période. Et tout ce petit monde aurait donc violé la fille de Verdin.

Verdin dit aussi qu’il a été frappé par trois flics de Paris (et met en ligne la photo où on le voit avec un oeil au beurre noir) après avoir tenté de porter plainte pour sa fille.

Sur Facebook, il répond à quelqu’un en expliquant (je recopie tel quel): “ce n est pas un bruit c est un fait jack lang as abuse de ma fille de 4 ans entre 99 et 2001 ma fille as été violée en réunion par sa mere ces compagnons et jack lang qui es un ami de viol de ces gens au maroc et en thailande ma fille laureen es décédée a la suite de ces viols d une infection

Comble du glauque, la petite Laureen serait donc décédée des suites de ces agressions.

Entendu une première fois par la brigade des mineurs en 2006, l’affaire a été étouffée, dit-il. C’est pourquoi il a retenté de porter plainte le 23 juin auprès du Procureur du TGI de Paris,  enregistrée sous le numéro p11-174-0987 section p4.

Emmanuel Verdin a d’ailleurs le même avocat que Tristane Banon.

Après l’affaire Coral dans laquelle Lang avait été cité avec des dizaines d’autres ‘personnalités’, après les propos de Ferry ou de Roger Holeindre (certes membre du Front national, mais un des seuls à citer Lang comme ayant “été compromis dans l’affaire d’un lieu de vie qui s’appelle le Coral”, où “on prostituait les enfants”), après les dossiers sur Lang au Maroc où il s’est fait remarquer au moins deux fois, il est incroyable de constater que personne ne lui a encore demandé de comptes. Au contraire, monsieur se permettait de critiquer le tabou concernant “la sexualité puérile”

[…]

Source : Un père porte plainte contre Jack Lang pour avoir violé sa fille en réunion http://dailynuts-news.over-blog.com/article-un-pere-porte-plainte-contre-jack-lang-pour-avoir-viole-sa-fille-en-reunion-mise-a-jour-24-10-87197878.html

A consulter egalement :
https://unaxe.wordpress.com/tag/pedophilie/
https://unaxe.wordpress.com/tag/farida-belghoul/
https://unaxe.wordpress.com/tag/theorie-du-genre/
http://www.pedopolis.com/
Jack Lang :”La sexualité puérile est encore un continent interdit” Réseau pédophile « Coral »  http://www.diatala.org/article-jack-lang-la-sexualite-puerile-est-encore-un-continent-interdit-reseau-pedophile-coral-75479505.html
Réseaux pédophiles : 90.000 enfants concernés et personne ne s’en souvient ! (partie 1) http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/international/article/reseaux-pedophiles-90-000-enfants-52665

22 July, 2014

Malaysia Airlines vol 17 (MH17 / MAS17) : un contrôleur aérien dévoile l’une des supercherie

Ci-dessous, les tweets censures par saint-Tweeter du controleur aerien Carlos. (@spainbuca) qui devoilent l’une des facettes de l’attentat.Messages originaux en espagnol et traduction en anglais.

Informez-vous aussi des cadavres retrouves, de la maniere dont l’avion aurait ete abattu, etc.

Et ce pendant que l’armee de l’Etat d’Israel mene une grande offensive contre le peuple palestinien (que la Malaisie soutient materiellement) dans le but d’exterminer les palestiniens et probablement comme premisse a la creation du Grand Israel.

Carlos. @spainbuca Twitter's censored tweets (2)

Carlos. @spainbuca Twitter’s censored tweets (2)

CHRONOLOGY OF @spainbuca’s TWITTER FEED10:21 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Autoridades de kiev, intentan hacer que pueda parecer un ataque de los pro-rusos

“Kiev Authorities, trying to make looks like an attack by pro-Russian”

10:24 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Ojo! Que puede ser un derribo B777 Malaysia Airlines en ukraine, 280 pasajeros

“warning! It can be a downing, Malaysia Airlines B777 in ukraine, 280 passengers”

10:25 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Cuidado! Kiev tiene lo que buscaba

“Warning! Kiev have what they wanted”

10:25 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Vuelven a tomar la torre de control en Kiev

“[Miitary] has taken control of ATC in Kiev”

10:27 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El avión B777 de Malaysia Airlines desapareció del radar, no hubo comunicación de ninguna anomalia, confirmado

“The Malaysia Airlines B777 plane disappeared from the radar, there was no communication of any anomaly, confirmed”

10:30 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Avión derribado, derribados, derribado no accidente

“Plane shot down, shot down, shot down, no accident”

10:31 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Kiev, tiene lo que buscaba, lo dije en los primeros tw, kiev es responsable @ActualidadRT

“Kiev have what they wanted, I said in the first tw [Tweets], Kiev is responsible @ ActualidadRT”

10:35 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Un accidente muy normal no es, no están amenazando en la misma torre del aeropuerto de kiev,

“An accident that is not quite normal, they are threatening us in the same tower of Kiev airport”

10:35 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nos van a quitar, nuestros tlf y demás de un momento a otro

“they will take from our phones and others stuff at any moment”

10:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Antes de que me quiten el tlf o me rompan la cabeza, derribado por Kiev

“Before They remove my phone or they break my head, shot down by Kiev”

11:12 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nosotros tenemos la confirmación. Avión derribado, la autoridad de kiev, ya tiene la información, derribado, estamos tranquilos ahora

“We have confirmation. Plane downed, Kiev authorities already have the information, downed, we are calm now”

11:13 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Que hace personal extranjero con autoridades de kiev en la torre? Recopilando toda la información

“What are doing foreigners with kiev authorities in the tower? Gathering all the information”

11:15 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Cuando sea posible sigo escribiendo

“When possible I´ll keep writing”

11:48 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El avión B 777 voló escoltado por 2 cazas de ukraine hasta minutos antes, de desaparecer de los radares,

The B777 plane flew escorted by Ukraine jet fighter until 2 minutes before disappearing from the radar,

11:54 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Sí las autoridades de kiev, quieren decir la verdad, esta recogido 2 cazas volaron muy cerca minutos antes , no lo derribo un caza

“If kiev authorities want to tell the truth, It´s gathered, 2 jet fighters flew very close minutes before, wasn’t downed by a fighter”

12:00 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nada más desaparecer el avión B 777 de Malaysia Airlines la autoridad militar de kiev nos informo del derribo, como lo sabían?

“Malaysia Airlines B777 plane just disappeared and Kiev military authority informed us of the downing, How they knew?”

12:00 – 17 de jul. de 2014 A los 7:00 minutos se notificó el derribo, más tarde se tomó la torre nuestra con personal extranjero q siguen aquí

“7:00 minutes after [plane dissapeared], the downing was notified, later our tower was taken with foreigner staff, they still here ”

12:01 – 17 de jul. de 2014 En los radares esta todo recogido, para los incrédulos, derribado por kiev, aquí lo sabemos y control aéreo militar también

“all this is gathered in radars, to the unbelieving, shot down by kiev, here we know it and military air traffic control also”

13:15 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Aquí los mandos militares manejan y admiten que militares a otras órdenes, pudieron ser, pero no, los pro-rusos

“Here the military commanders manage and support it could be military following other orders , but no, the pro-Russian”

13:29 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El ministro del interior si conocía que, hacían los cazas en la zona, el ministro de defensa no, .

“Interior Minister knew what the fighters were doing in the area, the defense minister didn’t.”

13:31 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Militares confirman que fue ukraine, pero se sigue sin saber de donde vino la orden

“Military confirm It was Ukraine, but still does not know where the order came from”

13:36 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Hace dias lo dije aquí, militares de kiev querían alzarse contra el actual presidente, esto puede ser una forma, a las órdenes de timoshenko

“Days ago I said here, kiev military wanted to rise against the current president, this may be a way, ordered by timoshenko [following timishenko orders]”

13:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los cazas volaron cerca del 777, hasta 3 minutos antes de desaparecer de los radares, solo 3 minutos

“The fighters flew close to 777, up to 3 minutes before disappearing from the radar, just 3 minutes”

13:43 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Se cierra el espacio aéreo

“Airspace closed”

13:45 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Se cierra el espacio aéreo, por miedo a más derribos

“Airspace is closed, more downings feared”

15:17 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Control militar entrega ahora mismo de forma oficial que el avión fue derribado por misil

“military control now officially [say] the plane was shot down by missile”

15:23 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El informe oficial firmado por las autoridades militares de control de kiev ya lo tiene el gobierno,,,, , derribado

“Government has the official report signed by the control military authorities in Kiev,,,, [plane] shot down”

15:26 – 17 de jul. de 2014 En el informe se indica de donde abría salido el misil, y se especifica que no proviene de las autodefensa en las zonas rebeldes

“The report indicates where the missile had come out [from], and specified is not from the selfdefence in rebel areas”

15:34 – 17 de jul. de 2014Los radares militares si recogieron los datos del misil lanzado al avión, los radares civiles no

“Military radar collected data from missile fired to the plane, civilian radars didn’t”

15:36 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los altos mandos militares no ordenaron el lanzamiento del misil, ,,alguien se le fue la mano en nombre de ukraine

“military high command did not gave the order to fire the missile, someone screw it ine the name of ukraine”

15:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Para el que no lo sepa, digamos así, hay militares a las órdenes del ministro de defensa y militares a las órdenes del ministro del interior

“For those who do not know, Let’s say, there are military under the orders of the defense minister and military under the orders of Interior Minister”

15:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los militares a las órdenes del ministro del interior conocían en cada momento lo que sucedió, .

“The military under the orders of Interior Minister knew what happened all the time .”

16:06 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Mandos militares aquí (ATC) torre de control, confirman que el misil es del ejercito de ukraine,

“Military commanders here (ATC) control tower, confirm that the missile is from the ukranian army,”

16:07 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Mandos militares que si lo sabían y otros mandos que no,

“military commanders that knew it and others didn´t ,”

16:08 – 17 de jul. de 2014 290 personas inocentes muertas, . Por una guerra inútil, donde el patriotismo se compra con dinero

“290 dead innocent people. What a useless war, where patriotism is bought with money”

16:09 – 17 de jul. de 2014 La forma de tomar la torre de control minutos después sabiendo todo los detalles, rápido nos hizo pensar que habían sido ellos

“Thw way the control tower was taken minutes after & knowing all the details, made ​​us think that they [made it]”

16:10 – 17 de jul. de 2014 La cara de los militares que llegaron más tarde diciendo pero que habéis echo, no dejo dudas

“The face of the soldiers who came later saying [what you just did], no chance for doubts”

16:12 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Es tal la decadencia que los militares acompañados de extranjeros que llegaron primero nos llegaron a pedir que dijéramos su versión

“Such is the decline that military who came first accompanied by foreigners came to us asking us to tell their version”

16:13 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nuestra respuesta, fue, estos radares no recogen el lanzamiento de misiles, los militares si, ya no quedaban dudas

“Our response was, these radars do not collect the launching of missiles, the military ones does, there were no doubts”

Source : Spanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing #MH17 http://slavyangrad.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/spanish-air-controller-kiev-borispol-airport-ukraine-military-shot-down-boeing-mh17/

Carlos. @spainbuca Twitter's censored tweets (3)

Carlos. @spainbuca Twitter’s censored tweets (3)

21 July, 2014

Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17/MAS17): Air Traffic Controller hints at False Flag

Air traffic controller tweets censored by Twitter in the aftermath of Malaysia Airlines’ flight 17 “crash”.

Official communication from the usual suspects has put the blame on the Ukrainian resistance (those fighting the neo-nazionists – search ukraine+coup+neo-nazis) while it emerged almost instantly that this was another false flag event. As usual with the main stream media (MSM), the official line was conveyed to populace of the world: ‘pro-Russian Ukrainian troops shot down Malaysia Airlines flight MH 017’.

We are not here to embrace Russia over the NATO member nations, all are part of a greater scheme that has for objective to usher a “new world order” in. The new order is not to appear suddenly, Satan’s worshippers work on it for hundred if not thousand of years with a brisk acceleration over the past couple hundred years or so.

The interesting pieces of information come from an individual working as air traffic controller which witnessed some disturbing incidents before and after the event.

Tweets translated from Spanish to English below.

Carlos. @spainbuca Twitter's censored tweets (2)

Carlos. @spainbuca Twitter’s censored tweets (2)

CHRONOLOGY OF @spainbuca’s TWITTER FEED10:21 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Autoridades de kiev, intentan hacer que pueda parecer un ataque de los pro-rusos

“Kiev Authorities, trying to make looks like an attack by pro-Russian”

10:24 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Ojo! Que puede ser un derribo B777 Malaysia Airlines en ukraine, 280 pasajeros

“warning! It can be a downing, Malaysia Airlines B777 in ukraine, 280 passengers”

10:25 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Cuidado! Kiev tiene lo que buscaba

“Warning! Kiev have what they wanted”

10:25 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Vuelven a tomar la torre de control en Kiev

“[Miitary] has taken control of ATC in Kiev”

10:27 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El avión B777 de Malaysia Airlines desapareció del radar, no hubo comunicación de ninguna anomalia, confirmado

“The Malaysia Airlines B777 plane disappeared from the radar, there was no communication of any anomaly, confirmed”

10:30 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Avión derribado, derribados, derribado no accidente

“Plane shot down, shot down, shot down, no accident”

10:31 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Kiev, tiene lo que buscaba, lo dije en los primeros tw, kiev es responsable @ActualidadRT

“Kiev have what they wanted, I said in the first tw [Tweets], Kiev is responsible @ ActualidadRT”

10:35 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Un accidente muy normal no es, no están amenazando en la misma torre del aeropuerto de kiev,

“An accident that is not quite normal, they are threatening us in the same tower of Kiev airport”

10:35 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nos van a quitar, nuestros tlf y demás de un momento a otro

“they will take from our phones and others stuff at any moment”

10:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Antes de que me quiten el tlf o me rompan la cabeza, derribado por Kiev

“Before They remove my phone or they break my head, shot down by Kiev”

11:12 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nosotros tenemos la confirmación. Avión derribado, la autoridad de kiev, ya tiene la información, derribado, estamos tranquilos ahora

“We have confirmation. Plane downed, Kiev authorities already have the information, downed, we are calm now”

11:13 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Que hace personal extranjero con autoridades de kiev en la torre? Recopilando toda la información

“What are doing foreigners with kiev authorities in the tower? Gathering all the information”

11:15 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Cuando sea posible sigo escribiendo

“When possible I´ll keep writing”

11:48 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El avión B 777 voló escoltado por 2 cazas de ukraine hasta minutos antes, de desaparecer de los radares,

The B777 plane flew escorted by Ukraine jet fighter until 2 minutes before disappearing from the radar,

11:54 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Sí las autoridades de kiev, quieren decir la verdad, esta recogido 2 cazas volaron muy cerca minutos antes , no lo derribo un caza

“If kiev authorities want to tell the truth, It´s gathered, 2 jet fighters flew very close minutes before, wasn’t downed by a fighter”

12:00 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nada más desaparecer el avión B 777 de Malaysia Airlines la autoridad militar de kiev nos informo del derribo, como lo sabían?

“Malaysia Airlines B777 plane just disappeared and Kiev military authority informed us of the downing, How they knew?”

12:00 – 17 de jul. de 2014 A los 7:00 minutos se notificó el derribo, más tarde se tomó la torre nuestra con personal extranjero q siguen aquí

“7:00 minutes after [plane dissapeared], the downing was notified, later our tower was taken with foreigner staff, they still here ”

12:01 – 17 de jul. de 2014 En los radares esta todo recogido, para los incrédulos, derribado por kiev, aquí lo sabemos y control aéreo militar también

“all this is gathered in radars, to the unbelieving, shot down by kiev, here we know it and military air traffic control also”

13:15 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Aquí los mandos militares manejan y admiten que militares a otras órdenes, pudieron ser, pero no, los pro-rusos

“Here the military commanders manage and support it could be military following other orders , but no, the pro-Russian”

13:29 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El ministro del interior si conocía que, hacían los cazas en la zona, el ministro de defensa no, .

“Interior Minister knew what the fighters were doing in the area, the defense minister didn’t.”

13:31 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Militares confirman que fue ukraine, pero se sigue sin saber de donde vino la orden

“Military confirm It was Ukraine, but still does not know where the order came from”

13:36 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Hace dias lo dije aquí, militares de kiev querían alzarse contra el actual presidente, esto puede ser una forma, a las órdenes de timoshenko

“Days ago I said here, kiev military wanted to rise against the current president, this may be a way, ordered by timoshenko [following timishenko orders]”

13:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los cazas volaron cerca del 777, hasta 3 minutos antes de desaparecer de los radares, solo 3 minutos

“The fighters flew close to 777, up to 3 minutes before disappearing from the radar, just 3 minutes”

13:43 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Se cierra el espacio aéreo

“Airspace closed”

13:45 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Se cierra el espacio aéreo, por miedo a más derribos

“Airspace is closed, more downings feared”

15:17 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Control militar entrega ahora mismo de forma oficial que el avión fue derribado por misil

“military control now officially [say] the plane was shot down by missile”

15:23 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El informe oficial firmado por las autoridades militares de control de kiev ya lo tiene el gobierno,,,, , derribado

“Government has the official report signed by the control military authorities in Kiev,,,, [plane] shot down”

15:26 – 17 de jul. de 2014 En el informe se indica de donde abría salido el misil, y se especifica que no proviene de las autodefensa en las zonas rebeldes

“The report indicates where the missile had come out [from], and specified is not from the selfdefence in rebel areas”

15:34 – 17 de jul. de 2014Los radares militares si recogieron los datos del misil lanzado al avión, los radares civiles no

“Military radar collected data from missile fired to the plane, civilian radars didn’t”

15:36 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los altos mandos militares no ordenaron el lanzamiento del misil, ,,alguien se le fue la mano en nombre de ukraine

“military high command did not gave the order to fire the missile, someone screw it ine the name of ukraine”

15:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Para el que no lo sepa, digamos así, hay militares a las órdenes del ministro de defensa y militares a las órdenes del ministro del interior

“For those who do not know, Let’s say, there are military under the orders of the defense minister and military under the orders of Interior Minister”

15:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los militares a las órdenes del ministro del interior conocían en cada momento lo que sucedió, .

“The military under the orders of Interior Minister knew what happened all the time .”

16:06 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Mandos militares aquí (ATC) torre de control, confirman que el misil es del ejercito de ukraine,

“Military commanders here (ATC) control tower, confirm that the missile is from the ukranian army,”

16:07 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Mandos militares que si lo sabían y otros mandos que no,

“military commanders that knew it and others didn´t ,”

16:08 – 17 de jul. de 2014 290 personas inocentes muertas, . Por una guerra inútil, donde el patriotismo se compra con dinero

“290 dead innocent people. What a useless war, where patriotism is bought with money”

16:09 – 17 de jul. de 2014 La forma de tomar la torre de control minutos después sabiendo todo los detalles, rápido nos hizo pensar que habían sido ellos

“Thw way the control tower was taken minutes after & knowing all the details, made ​​us think that they [made it]”

16:10 – 17 de jul. de 2014 La cara de los militares que llegaron más tarde diciendo pero que habéis echo, no dejo dudas

“The face of the soldiers who came later saying [what you just did], no chance for doubts”

16:12 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Es tal la decadencia que los militares acompañados de extranjeros que llegaron primero nos llegaron a pedir que dijéramos su versión

“Such is the decline that military who came first accompanied by foreigners came to us asking us to tell their version”

16:13 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nuestra respuesta, fue, estos radares no recogen el lanzamiento de misiles, los militares si, ya no quedaban dudas

“Our response was, these radars do not collect the launching of missiles, the military ones does, there were no doubts”

Source: Spanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing #MH17 http://slavyangrad.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/spanish-air-controller-kiev-borispol-airport-ukraine-military-shot-down-boeing-mh17/

Carlos. @spainbuca Twitter's censored tweets (3)

Carlos. @spainbuca Twitter’s censored tweets (3)

20 January, 2014

Jim Stone’s BOMBSHELL! ISRAELI MAFIA RUNNING FUKUSHIMA CLEANUP

Attentat de Fukushima dossier complet : http://jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html
Attentat de Fukushima dernières nouvelles : http://jimstonefreelance.com/shutupordie.html
Le MOSSAD et les attentats : https://unaxe.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/le-mossad-israelien-et-les-attaques-terroristes-du-11-septembre-2001/

SHUT UP OR DIE!

Fukushima cleanup workers given death threats by mafia

BOMBSHELL! ISRAELI MAFIA RUNNING FUKUSHIMA CLEANUP

NEW BOMBSHELL: JAPAN LIMITING ISRAELI VISAS TO KEEP ISRAELI MAFIA OUT . . . . Israeli travelers now using fake visas from other countries to enter Japan.

“I submitted a visa application to the Israeli consulate in Tokyo, but was informed that a visitor’s visa is usually not granted because the Israeli mafia is growing rapidly in Japan”

Permalink

I know the above headline sounds too incredible to be true, but it is definitely true. Organized crime is usually tied to intelligence agencies at the top, and it is the Israeli Mossad, the same group that fronted Magna BSP, that is now handling Fukushima “cleanup” via control of Japan’s Yakuza mafia. The Yakuza and the Israeli mafia formed an alliance with each other in 1990. Take a look at what is here, it may sound too “out there” to be true, but it definitely is true.

All of what is spoken of on this page is now properly referenced.

UPDATE: CONFIRMED BY REUTERS – over 50,000 people now doing cleanup of radioactive debris from reactor 3. FINALLY the real numbers. Unconfirmed blogs say medical professionals have recorded over 800 radiation deaths of cleanup workers and have been told to keep their mouths shut under heavy threat in the name of “national security”. THAT MAKES SENSE.

Updated Jan 16 2014For now, there are an officially claimed 5,000 workers doing fukushima cleanup, at least that is the number the ziopress is willing to admit to. I guess they think that is a believable number that people can cope with. But there is a huge problem with this number. And that is –

Over 700 different registered companies and at least 50 unregistered companies are involved in cleanup of radioactive debris left in the wake of the reactor 3 explosion. Virtually ALL of these companies are Yakuza mafia run. And if over 700 of these companies add up to 5,000 people, it means that only six people per company are working fukushima cleanup. That is not a believable number. It is my guess that the real number is between 50,000 and 100,000 people are working on Fukushima cleanup, numbers so high that they would result in hard questions being asked by the greater nuclear community and that is why the real numbers are being kept silent.

The official story right from the beginning is that the explosions were hydrogen gas explosions which would be harmless and incapable of spreading a lot of radioactive material. That is the only thing that can match a realistic scenario for boiling water reactors. You cannot, with such a reactor, get expulsion of hard material up into the atmosphere. Due to the inherent nature of the system, the only disaster scenario that can happen is melt downs and not explosions and expulsions of reactor cores. And since having huge amounts of radioactive debris spread over miles cannot in any non warfare, HARDWARE ONLY related situation happen, it is the job of the scamming ziopress and fake alternative press to hide the reality that this indeed happened, a reality which resulted in the need for an epic cleanup effort.

Reactor 3 never melted down before the explosion. It was destroyed by a nuclear weapon while still fully functional. This is the only thing that matches the scenario for what actually happened.

What proves this to be the case? It is the large amount of dust from the reactor core, dust which is now being cleaned up by thousands of admitted to, and probably upwards of a hundred thousand people. Reactor fuel pellets in a boiling water reactor are composed of uranium oxide dust which has a zircon cladding around the dust to keep it in pellet form. If the reactors had melted down before the explosions, there would have been no dust, the fuel would instead have been in the form of a liquid that would not have spread so readily and floated on the wind. Furthermore, it took an extreme kinetic event to pulverize the fuel pellets and send the uranium oxide dust inside them skyward. To do this, first the explosion had to penetrate a final thick concrete shield immediately surrounding the reactor that is inside the inner containment. It then had to completely blow away the reactor pressure vessel, which is several inches of solid steel thick. After that, it then had to blow apart the core, to get to the fuel pellets, and THEN have enough energy left in the shock wave to pulverize the fuel pellets and send them skyward in the form of dust. There is no conventional weapon on earth that could do that, only a nuclear weapon could, and the proof that this event did indeed happen via a beyond conventional explosion is the fact that much of Japan is now completely covered in this dust. Neither the hardware of the reactor itself or conventional weaponry could create such a scenario.

And the bigger point is that if the reactors had only melted down, there would be no cleanup needed outside of the power facility. Yet melt downs are the only scenario the laws of physics support with the given materials and hardware absent a nuclear weapon blast, so melt downs are what scam sites like ENE news and others are pushing with regard to the dead starfish. And melt downs and open air gas explosions would never have destroyed or breached the inner containments, only explosives would, so why are these containments now leaking?

The key to keeping the lid on all of this now is silence from the workers

And that is precisely why they are being given death threats for speaking up about what is really going on with all of this. Obviously after the explosions, whatever was left of the reactors melted completely down. But at the time of the explosions there could not possibly have been melted reactor cores, the hard material now being cleaned up over 20 km away could not have come from that scenario.

The Japanese Mafia, which is under Jewish control at the top, is handling the cleanup

Make sure you scroll FAR down this page to the links that prove the Israelis are in full control of Yakuza, this particular report is huge

And HOW IN THE HELL DID THE ISRAELI CONTROLLED YAKUZA MAFIA GET THIS JOB? I will tell you how – If you want to cover up a crime scene, have criminal organizations in charge of the cover up. People are dying left and right out at Fukushima because there is so much nuclear material laying around in the open compliments of reactor 3’s core ejection. Since we have a scenario that could not have happened absent an act of war, criminals have to handle it if it is to remain a suitable secret. If anyone speaks up, BOOM, they are dead. If anyone steps out of line, a bullet to the head. And Tepco could not possibly get away with this, they are not the ones in charge of it. All this criminal activity is taking place under the radar, via mafia controlled subcontractors with Jewish overlords at the top.

Japan is absolutely screwed

The contamination ended up being exactly what I said it would be from the beginning. But I was wrong about something – and that is that rather than abandon land, the Japanese are actually going to clean it up. This will involve the removal of all vegetation from thousands of square kilometers of land, and the top five centimeters of soil from all of that land. The cleanup does not only involve the exclusion zone, it extends all of the way through Sendai.

And the big question is, WHY is this only coming to light NOW? I will tell you exactly why. It took this long for the public to mostly forget that officially, the fukushima disaster was only a little steam and a little loose gas. And Tepco could not and did not front a lie like that, the lie HAD TO come straight from the ziopress. Tepco initially stated that the radiation released was, in their own words “immeasurable” but the ziopress and nuclear blackmail silenced them within two days of them saying it. Now, over two years later, the public concience is sleeping on the topic and it is FINALLY safe for the ziopress to tell pieces of the truth, first starting with obscure news outlets such as AlJazeera because with an event that far back in the past people won’t care about the details and Tepco has been successfully blackballed.

They now have to begin telling at least pieces of the truth, because the scenario on the ground has become too obvious for the official lie to cover up. They are obviously calculating what information to release at what time to avoid having too many lights go on all at once.

The least influential people in Japan are doing the cleanup

The mafia contractors are taking the drug addicts, homeless, and other extremely disadvantaged and unsophisticated people and using them exclusively for the cleanup, especially at Fukushima proper. They are not having geniuses go in there. And there are reasons for this – this low economic class will produce the fewest complaints after being destroyed by the radiation, and this particular class of people will mostly lack the ability to question what is going on and what really happened to those reactors. It is also because These people are largely isolated and disposable, and few people, if any at all will notice if they die. The fact that death threats are being issued at all, the fact that the Mafia is involved with this at all should say it all.

In order to cover up a war crime this big, a police state style management had to happen to keep the people silent, which Japan does not have via the government. The mafia had to be brought in, and you can’t tell me the Japanese government is unaware. The Japanese government would not permit the cleanup via the mafia to happen as it is happening, but they are allowing it to proceed the way it is because they are under threat, which is:

In Magna BSP’s own words, with only 12 employees, IDF front company Magna BSP is handling the security for ALL of Japan’s reactors. Magna has to be an IDF/Mossad front company, because 12 people could not possibly either protect or threaten that many reactors. 12 claimed employees means it can only be a mafia style protection racket that is “protecting” Japan’s reactors, a “protection” racket which is run by the top criminals in the highest political places outside of Japan – and if Japan steps out of line, Stuxnet and more nukes go hot and it is BOOM to more reactors.

YOU GOT THAT RIGHT. VIA CONTROL OVER THE LOCAL YAKUZA MAFIA THE ISRAELI MAFIA IS RUNNING A MAJORITY OF THE SUBCONTRACTORS THAT ARE HIRING PEOPLE TO WORK FUKUSHIMA, AND I HAVE PROOF. THE LAST COUPLE DAYS WERE TOO GOOD COMPLIMENTS OF GOOD MAILS, AND ALL ARE WHACKED NOW. EVEN SPAMS STOPPED AT 11 AM ON THE 14th. BUT I MANAGED TO DIG WELL ENOUGH AND HAVE CONFIRMED – THE HEAVILY ISRAELI MOSSAD INFLUENCED ISRAELI MAFIA IS RUNNING MOST OF THE SUBCONTRACTING FIRMS HANDLING FUKUSHIMA CLEANUP VIA CONTROL OF LOCAL JAPANESE YAKUZA MAFIA GROUPS. WITH THE ISRAELI MAFIA ALSO RUNNING THE GLOBAL SEX SLAVE TRADE, THEY ARE VERY ADEPT AT KEEPING BIG SECRETS HIDDEN. And to the censors, you may think you won by wiping google within minutes of my posting this, THINK AGAIN. Now we know why at least one worker received death threats for speaking up about what is really going on out there.

Take THAT for censoring my mails, it won’t do you a bit of good.

Working in Tokyo for the Israeli Mafia

This is the account of a witness to the Israeli mafia in Japan. It is indeed there and in control of the Yakuza

Note – I lived in Japan for almost a decade. The Israelis have had a strong presence there for at least 2 decades. On the cover of the Japan Times, circa 1990, there was a small article stating that the Israeli Mafia and the Japanese Mafia had formed a pact.I knew an Iranian who sold drugs for the Japanese mob (Yakuza). He said some Iranian Jews he knew were selling jewelry in Tokyo and making $2000 a day – in actuality, they were selling hash and meth to the Japanese. Some (not all) of these Israeli street hawkers are really in the drug trade. More than a few of them get jobs in Tokyo through connections in Bangkok at Israeli run guest houses, like the ones on Khao San Road.

There are better ways to make a living.

It’s said that a fool and his money are soon parted. And that’s exactly why there are so many Israelis selling jewelry on the streets of Japan – they’re making it even easier. But the good news for the traveller in search of a buck is that you don’t have to be Israeli to hawk fake Rolexes and silver rings to the Japanese. I did it and I’m as uncircumcised as the next goy.

The boss once asked me: “Tom, are you Jewish?”

“No.”

“Well, nobody’s perfect.”

Yes, you will be working for the Israeli mafia and they’ll suck all the work they can out of you. They’re lying, corrupt sleazebags but at least you won’t have to kow-tow to some nerdy Japanese boss. The Israelis have all the pitches on the streets sewn up these days so there’s no choice but to work for them. At least you don’t have to bring any stock yourself and they take care of all the practical stuff for you. All you’ve got to do is sell.

The set-up is like this: You get yourself to Japan and the Israelis will find some cheap accommodation for you. If you’re hard up they might even lend you a bit of money for the first week or two. Then after a few days of hanging around the stalls of the other sellers, learning the tricks of hard sell and some basic Japanese, you’ll be given a pitch of your own. You’ll be driven to work every day and set up four boards of jewelery and one table for the fake watches. For every item there is a minimum price, but you get 40% of the gross so you sell them for whatever you can get away with.

And then you’re on your own. For the next 10 hours you do your best to lie, flirt, bully and manipulate by any means possible anyone and everyone who passes by into buying something. “Please, sir! Come and look at my shop! Looking is free only! I make you good price! Buy something for your girlfriend!” Sound familiar? Yes, you have to become just like all those merchants and hawkers who drove you crazy all across Asia. Believe me, you’ll feel more sympathy for them in the future.

You’ll fleece drunken salary men returning from a night out at a blowjob bar, bimbos looking for a new Gucci accessory, and naive teenagers who want to buy their first Rolex. And if you can’t agree about the price? Well, this is a society of Samurai, after all. Looking some defiant student in the eye, I’d draw back my shoulders and say:

“Are you a man?”

“Yes, of course!”

“Then let’s play junken!”

Also known as scissors, paper, and stone, this ancient game is sacred and few lacked the honour to pay your asking price if they lost.

But whatever you do, don’t convert the prices into dollars in your head because you’ll die laughing. You can sell pieces of purple string to put around the wrist for $15. It all depends on your confidence. Once, my friend told me, our boss was hanging around his stall and he set down on the table some lighter that he’d bought at 7-11 for two dollars. Some drunken businessman came along and fell in love with the thing. He was talked into buying it for $100.

Of course, the business is not exactly legal. I was working on a busy shopping street over Christmas, and in 10 days the police closed me down 35 times. They’d march up to my stall and shout angrily in Japanese I would pretend not to understand. They’d make me sign some form in Japanese, then I’d turn off the lights and look sorry. When they were out of sight, I’d open up again. They couldn’t believe I kept coming back.

“He’s a real tough cookie, this one,” they must have mumbled.

And if it wasn’t the boys in blue wearing me down with their clipboard and forms, it was the Yakuza. They’re paid off by the Israelis of course, but there’s always some drunk criminal who wants to scare a gaijin ( any foreigner.) Usually it was just some young, Mafia wannabe punk out to prove himself, but once I was fooling around with some pissed old guy who came to me on a quiet night.

“I am businessman!” He told me and held up his left hand with the missing little finger. When the Yakuza fuck up, honour demands that they cut off one of their finger segments to atone. As a guitarist, it was a horrific sight. All I could say was: “Yes, sir! No, sir! How many bags full, sir?”

On a good day, selling silver in Tokyo was like stealing food from a paraplegic, and I couldn’t believe how a nation of such hopeless suckers ever got so rich in the first place. On the bad days, though, when rain came with the cold and random street aggravation, I hated the work as much as my own corrupted soul for sinking so low as to take such a job.

Still, I was lucky. Over three months I managed to save about US$3,000, but others I met only managed to cover their costs. This is definitely a job best suited to pretty girls and good liars

Other links proving the Israeli Mafia is running the Yakuza mafia, and therefore Fukushima cleanup

http://www.vosizneias.com/39454/2009/10/06/tokyo-police-crack-suspected-israeli-drug-trafficking-ring-in-japan/ “I submitted a visa application to the Israeli consulate in Tokyo, but was informed that a visitor’s visa is usually not granted because the Israeli mafia is growing rapidly in Japan” My comment: Yeah, with billions of dollars in Fuku cash they ought to be growing rapidly!

The first paragraph of this one pretty much nails it: Read the first paragraph, the Israeli mafia is obviously well entrenched in Tokyo

These are good:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FdVck03_vc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZOfDE2Y4lE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgSvyFlggJs

This one is cute! http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/03/23/rabbi-japans-disasters-due-to-prosecution-of-hasidic-drug-smugglers/

https://twitter.com/jpnKevin_T/status/305559407763267584

These collectively show that there is a very strong presense of the Israeli mafia operating in Japan, and as far back as 1990 the Israeli mafia had united with Yakuza. Given the skills of the Jews in taking over everything, simple logic would dictate that 25 years later, and current Japanese restrictions on Israeli passport visas for the sole purpose of keeping the Israeli mafia out, that Israel now owns Yakuza. If Yakuza and other mafia (Israeli) are providing a majority of the workers for Fukushima cleanup, it then follows simple logic to conclude that the orders for silence (or face death) threats given to workers have their origins in Israel, which is a nation in deep militarily strategic need of the best cover up possible.

Here is the Japanese reality about Fukushima

Radiation in Japan much higher than stated in the MSM, workers likely issued death threats by Israeli Mossad front companies

This is to once again re-state that Northern Japan is basically ruined and the hype about radioactive water leaking into the ocean is practically meaningless when put in contrast with the massive shot of radiation the Pacific got from the explosion at reactor 3.

I am not going to be like CNN and Fox, sitting around saying only a little steam got out, nor am I going to say that the Pacific is dying because of Fukushima. This is mostly because all the anomalies in the Pacific are simultaneously occurring in the Atlantic. The starfish issue is not related to Fukushima, something else is amiss. For something that is actually true about Fukushima and damn spooky, Click here, and remember, the readings of 1,000 times over normal are OUTSIDE THE DECLARED DANGER ZONE just like I said it would be. Crazy stuff indeed. Watch for ENE to parrot this.

Obviously, since the reactors used uranium with a half life of many millions of years, and Plutonium, with a half life of thousands of years, and this stuff is dispersed evenly over a large area, there will be no practical way to clean any of this up. If you bury it, erosion will eventually expose it, and how can you scrape up the surface of every mountain, valley, field, or other terrain features and dispose of the entire top layer of the earth? That cannot happen, Japan really is screwed.On the other side of the issue however is the Pacific. Ordinary people are going out with their own geiger counters and finding nothing wrong. No damning radiation stats are forthcoming from the starfish crowd. Oceanographers are calling it a massive viral outbreak involving both the Pacific and the Atlantic. And I therefore believe there is a huge effort underway by usurpers of the truth movement to get people all scared over Fukushima, never tell them Israel did it, blame Tepco and the nuclear industry, and side track the truth movement AWAY from the real issues, such as Stuxnet at home, tainted vaccines, the encroaching police state, the Obama care disaster (and NO, you CANNOT opt out so I did not link that crap) and many other issues we should all be focused on.

The big dirty at Fukushima already happened, and it happened when reactor 3 had its guts blown into the Pacific compliments of Magna BSP and the IDF. If there is a radiation problem in the pacific right now which I seriously doubt, it came from the big blast and not from a little ground water seeping in from the shoreline. It came from the big blast, which was carried by the wind into the ocean. This horrible contamination in Japan is the result of whatever dust was laying around after the big blast in the immediate vicinity of reactor 3 and then subsequently carried abroad. Had the wind currents been different and had the entire core been dispersed over land and not the ocean immediately following the blast, it would have literally cut Japan in half.

There is no doubt a lot got dumped into the Pacific, enough to make the water beneath the initial dust trail from reactor 3 240 times the safe limit within 10 miles of the coast. That has since dispersed. But that is a comparably small area, and I do not buy that it would contaminate the entire ocean. The starfish have had trouble off the coast for years now, even before Fukushima ever happened and it takes more time for the ocean currents from Japan to even hit the west coast than the current starfish die off can support, this die off started happening too soon for that. True, the water should be arriving at the coast right around now, but this starfish die off has been ongoing for two years.

Oceanographers are saying it is a virus and not Fukushima doing this. So are they all bought out by the Israeli Mossad too? Did Israel go into damage control mode and pay all of the oceanographers to shut up? Oh, I get it, TEPCO PAID THEM ALL OFF INSTEAD.

If anyone believes the west coast is frying from fukushima while the oceanographers say nada, I would say it is time for the thinking cap. If ENE and Infowars can say the ocean is destroyed with a web site, the oceanographers can say so as well. No one is shutting anyone up over this. Why are the oceanographers saying it is not Fuku then? How did the Pacific ocean currents carry Fuku fallout to the Atlantic to kill the starfish there as well?

And about the latest propaganda row over how the workers are treated at Fukushima, blame it on Israel. Find out who is running those subcontractor companies. I bet a dime to a dollar they are all Mossad fronts, issuing death threats against workers to NOT talk about how it could not possibly have been hydrogen gas that destroyed the place. If any are smart enough to figure out what really went on there, it is shut up or die, straight from the mouth of the Mossad. COUNT ON IT.

The web won’t be around forever, get the truth in print. Uncensored magazine is perfect for this:

Source: BOMBSHELL! ISRAELI MAFIA RUNNING FUKUSHIMA CLEANUP http://jimstonefreelance.com/shutupordie.html

Read full dossier: 3/11 was Japan’s 9/11. It’s all documented folks! This investigation has been endorsed by the engineers who designed and built Fukushima Diiachi http://jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html

On the same topic:
Fukushima, who cares? / Fukushima, qui s’en soucie ?
Fukushima clean up double: how TEPCO, GE and the Zionists are destroying Japan
Fukushima disaster, a look back at what is changing our world
Compromised ‘Alternative’ Media: Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Coast to Coast AM, etc
USA: Stuxnet ready to blow up nuclear plants?
Incident à la centrale nucléaire française du Tricastin (Provence)
Surviving Radioactive Fallout & Radiation Contamination from Japan, Iran or North Korea

26 October, 2013

Témoignage du caporal-chef Slim Rehouma vétéran de la guerre d’Afghanistan (Alerte !)

Militaire français refusant de combattre pour Al Qaïda / CIA / Mossad service de santé des armées, régiment médical de La Valbonne (le serpent encore...)

Extra-ordinaire temoignage du vétérant caporal-chef Slim Rehouma du service de santé des armées (régiment médical de La Valbonne) sur son experience au sein de Armée Française durant ses quelques mois en Afghanistan.

Immanquable.

Sujets abordes sans tabous :
– Intoxication (vaccins ? munitions a l’uranium appauvri ?)
– Mort du brigadier-chef Clément Kovac
– Mort du lieutenant Camille Levrel
Trafic de drogue (opium)
Rapprochement de la Troisième Guerre Mondiale (deja prevue par les franc-macons en 1871) (voir en bas de cet article)
– Securisation des matieres premieres pour le compte des multinationales
– Nicolas Sarkozy et Mouammar Kadhafi
– Affaire Jérôme Cahuzac
– Les Oies du Périgord
Guerre au Mali
Pauvrete en France
– Vrais-faux bugs dans Louvois, le “logiciel unique à vocation interarmées de la solde”
François Hollande retirer les balles des chargeurs des militaires lors des voeux de fin d’année et fait retirer les percuteurs des FAMAS
Affaiblissement de l’Armée Française… a propos ?
Bruno Boulefkhad
Comprendre le monde dans lequel vous vivez, faites le bilan de votre vie et reprenez le pouvoir, ne vous laissez pas divertir, pensez par vous meme et restez unis en faisant fi des divisions.
Informez-vous, arretez de vous desinformer : jetez vos televiseurs…

Slim Rehouma, Caporal-Chef de l’Armée française et vétéran de la guerre d’Afghanistan, livre un témoignage cru et réaliste de la situation de l’institution et pose un certain nombre de questions. Cette interview va t-elle faire en sorte que les langues se délient au sein des soldats et de l’état-major ?

vous pouvez envoyer vos messages à Slim Rehouma à cette adresse: amelie.carlier@yahoo.fr

Liens :
http://www.info-libre.fr/
http://www.bruno-boulefkhad.fr/
http://gendarmes-en-colere.forum2discussion.net/
https://unaxe.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/1871-les-trois-guerres-mondiales-etaient-deja-planifiees/
http://www.cercledesvolontaires.fr/2013/06/26/guerre-dafghanistan-temoignage-du-caporal-chef-slim-rehouma/

Articles :
France to reduce drastically Army manpower, discard nuclear deterrence
Syrie, comment Laurent Fabius pousse pour la guerre
Lettre ouverte au Président de la République après la rafle des Champs-Élysées du 25 mai 2013
UE : Une résolution vise a fusionner les armées européennes

-*-

Le plan decrit par Albert Pike en 1871 pour les trois guerres mondiales, voici ses ecrits originaux (source : http://www.libertyforlife.com/nwo/albert_pike.htm) :

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.

6 July, 2013

The Myth of the Six Million by David Hoggan (1969)

Search and discover for yourself:

nazism = national-zionism

Adolf Hitler = grand-son of a Rothschild

Six million what? Six million jews die every now and then (Don Heddesheimer‘s The First Holocaust:   The “Six Million” Myth)…

Communism = Judaism (“Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism” –Rabbi Stephen Wise)

Talmudic paedophilia

Jesus Christ = non-Jew

Jews = non-Israelites (Genome Biology and Evolution  The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses)

———————– Page 1———————–

The Myth of the Six Million

by David Hoggan

(1969)

AAARGH edition on line

2001

———————– Page 2———————–

1. The Attitude of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists toward the Jews

Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of defeated, truncated, and starving Germany on January

30, 1933, by President Paul von Hindenburg. Jews throughout the world professed to be horrified

by news of this event. It was also evident that a campaign against the still unpopular Germans on

the Jewish question might possibly be exploited to advance the position of World Jewry. Twenty

years later, this turned out to be the case to an extent that few Jews could have foreseen at the

time. Dr. Max Nussbaum, the former chief rabbi of the Jewish community in Berlin, declared on

April 11, 1953: “The position the Jewish people occupy today in the world is-despite the

enormous losses ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago.”

The leaders of the modern German Reich from its foundation in 1871 until Hitler’s appointment in

1933 had usually been friendly toward the Jews. Hitler, however, was outspokenly hostile

toward every manifestation of Jewish influence in Germany. The “unchangeable” program of his

National Socialist Party, which was first proclaimed at Munich on February 24, 1920, advocated

the revocation of concessions granted to the German Jews in the various German states during the

period from 1812 to 1848. These concessions bad made German Jews in every respect fully equal to

Germans. Hitler was determined to set the clock back on Germany’s treatment of the Jews. His

position toward the Jews closely resembled that of Martin Luther, Von den Juden und ihrer Luegen

(About the Jews and their Lies, Wittenberg, 1543), and Heinrich von Treitschke, Ein Wort ueber

unser Judenthum (A Word About our Jewry, Berlin, 1880). Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor in a

government coalition with the conservative German National People’s Party brought him a

gigantic step closer to a position where his will might become law in all questions affecting the

German Jews.

Hitler’s overt struggle against the Jews had begun the moment be joined the diminutive anti-

Jewish National Socialist Party in 1919. He had been a leading contender in the German political

arena since his Party acquired 107 Reichstag seats in the September, 1930, German national

election. In 1933, this struggle entered a decisive phase. There were approximately 500,000 Jews

in Germany when Hitler became Chancellor in January, 1933.

2. Disabilities Imposed on the Jews by National Socialism

The first major directive against the Jews, after the one-day boycott of April 1, 1933, was the law

of April 7, 1933, which required the dismissal of Jews from government service and from positions

in the universities. This law was not fully implemented in practice until 1939 :although. many

functionaries and teachers were retired on pensions before the end of 1933. Jews were still

employed in German journalism and publishing as late as 1939, but they had been required by 1936

to sell all of their share of financial control over German newspapers, publishing houses, and the

film industry on the basis of an emergency press enactment by President Hindenburg under Article

48 of the Weimar constitution on March 1, 1933.

Undoubtedly the most fundamental National Socialist legislation against the Jews was enacted

by the Reichstag at its meeting in Nuremberg on September 15, 1935. These famous Nuremberg

Laws included the citizenship law and the law for the protection of German blood and honor.

Jews were carefully defined as persons with four or three Jewish grandparents, or persons with

two Jewish grandparents who practiced the Jewish religion or were married to Jewish partners.

This legislation deprived the Jews of German citizenship and of the right to fly the German

colors, it prohibited Jews from marrying German citizens, and it provided that sexual intercourse

between Jews and German citizens was a criminal offense. Jews were not allowed to employ female

German servants of less than forty-five years of age. A supplementary law of July 6, 1938

permitted divorce solely on racial grounds.

—  2  —

———————– Page 3———————–

It should be noted that as late as 1938 the segregation of Jews was still limited to prohibition of

sexual relations, and to the exclusion of Jews from university employment, government work, Or

from the ownership of the mass media of communication. The Jews were allowed to operate and to

own businesses, to share public facilities of recreation, culture, and transportation, to engage in

professions such as medicine and law, to accept ordinary employment, and to travel abroad.

Indeed, many thousands of Jews were still living quietly and working in the German community

when the country was occupied by Allied troops in 1945.

Although it was the National Socialist policy to encourage the Jews to leave Germany, rather

liberal arrangements were made to permit those Jews who migrated to take with them a sizeable

portion of their assets. It was easier to transfer or take with them the sums received from the

properties sold than liquid assets. Billions of marks were transferred to Palestine; under the

Havarah agreement there were no restrictions whatever.

3. Bruno Amann’s Exposition of the Basis of the Anti-Jewish Policy of National Socialism

The official National Socialist attitude toward the German Jews from 1933 to the outbreak of

World War 11 was best summarized in Bruno Amann, Das Weltbild des Judentunis: Grundlagen

des voelkischen Antisemitismus (A Picture of World Jewry: the Foundations of Popular Anti-

Semitism, Vienna, 1939). Amann depicted the National Socialist revolution of 1933 as the

beginning of a new age for Germany based on the democratic principle of the community of the

entire people as opposed to the class barriers 4 the past. He denounced most of Jewry as an

intensely disloyal, avaricious, and decadent element in German culture after World War I.

Amann emphatically rejected Nietzsche’s thesis that Christianity marks a culmination of

Jewish tradition. He argued with great force that Christianity is, instead, a final departure from

the “chosen people” concept of the Jews. He noted the contention of numerous propagandists

hostile to Germany that Hitler was seeking to make a “chosen people” of the Germans. Amann

rejected this, and he insisted on the common unity of European culture. He suggested that the true

Christian tradition called upon all Europeans to maintain both a guarded hostility and a

necessary protective front against the Jews.

Amann believed that forces at work in other European countries would ultimately produce in

them a similar attitude toward the Jewish question. In the meantime, Germany had broken the

hold of the “alien and aggressive Jewish avarice over her spiritual and material heritage.”

Amann was emphatic in insisting that the measures taken against the German Jews by 1939 would

be adequate for all time in protecting German interests.

Jewry had been no less shaken than Germany by new doctrines and concepts. Amann regarded the

Jewish people as split between the advocates of assimilation and the more modern Zionists, but

he did not believe that it was difficult to predict the ultimate total triumph of Zionism. There

was a natural meeting of interests in the rejection of Jewish assimilation by both National

Socialism and Zionism. It was for this reason that the German authorities were, perfectly

willing to cooperate with the Zionists in arranging concentrations of Jewish population in certain

areas. Zionism was born of the modern Eastern European nationalist movements within the

context of a special Jewish tradition; National Socialism was born of the political, economic, and

military collapse of Germany in World War I.

Amann traced the beginning of Jewish emancipation in Europe from the first emancipation

enactments of revolutionary France in 1791. He regarded these enactments as the beginning of a

grave threat to European civilization. His special attention was reserved for a detailed study of

the advocates of emancipation in Germany, beginning with Lessing, and of the full realization of

emancipation itself by 1848. Amann claimed that the Jews had secured a dominant position in

Germany prior to World War I, but be added that this powerful position would probably not have

been challenged seriously had it not been for the German defeat in 1918. The different

circumstances governing the position of Jews in various countries was viewed by Amann as a major

subject for study within the Research Department on the Jewish Question connected to the Reich

Institute of History.

Amann conceded in 1939 the existence of a vast and world-wide sympathy for the suppressed Jews

of Germany. This was because of the clear solidarity of interest between the liberal Jews and

—  3  —

———————– Page 4———————–

their sympathizers in the West, and the Bolshevik Jewry of the East. In both East and West the

Soviet Union was regarded with special affection for having destroyed the anti-Jewish Tsarist

colossus of 1917 and for having replaced it with a regime where Jewish influence was greater than

in any other state of the world. Amann saw a permanent danger to peace in the revolutionary

alliance of these East-West forces against Germany. A more enlightened attitude toward the

Jewish danger in the West would be the only means within the foreseeable future of overcoming

this threat. Amann little suspected that traditional British balance of power calculations would

exploit the existing sentiment to produce in the immediate future the very war which he

dreaded.

Amann’s book does not contain any vulgar propaganda against the Jews. Indeed, it in no way

proves the need for an anti-Jewish policy, but rather it accepts this need as a truism based on the

old, established traditions. These traditions are understandably assigned a special importance in

an age of spreading Communism. Amann’s book is far more typical of the official German

attitude, toward the Jews under Hitler than the erratic utterances of that Self-Styled

individualist of Nuremberg, Gauleiter Julius Streicher of Franconia, in his sensational

newspaper, Der Stürmer. This was the only newspaper of its kind throughout Germany, and it

was suppressed by the German Government in 1939. Der Stürmer contained much coarse humor,

graphic cartoons, and appeals to old prejudices. Nevertheless, there was not the slightest excuse

for the United States, Great Britain, and France to collaborate with the Soviet Union at

Nuremberg in 1946 in securing Streicher’s execution. The Soviet Union was the only nation in the

world at that time where the utterance of anti-Jewish ideas was a capital offense.

4. The Three Phases of National Socialist Treatment of the Jews before World War II

The National Socialist treatment of the German Jews prior to World War II must be considered in

three main phases of which the second one was easily the most important. These would include:

(1) the sometimes turbulent days of the period from Hitler’s appointment until the National

Socialist Party purge of June 30, 1934; (2) the following period, until the additional measures

enacted after the assassination of Ernst von Rath in November, 1938; and (3) the period from

November, 1938, until the outbreak of war in 1939. The second period was dominated by the

Nuremberg laws of September, 1935, which deprived persons defined as Jews of their citizen

status and proscribed sexual and marital relations between them and the German people.

During the first period there were occasional incidents of public violence involving Jews,

although no Jews were actually killed, and a very considerable number of Jews were arrested and

placed in concentration camps for short terms because of their Marxist affiliations. During the

second period, from 1934 to 1938, the concentration camp population, as conceded by Gerald

Reitlinger, The SS: Alibi of a Nation (London, 1956, pp. 253ff.), seldom exceeded 20,000

throughout all Germany, and the number of Jews in the camps was never more than 3,000. During

the third period, in which several new measures were enacted against the Jews, the concentration

camp population remained virtually stationary. There was an extensive exodus of Jews from

Germany during the first, and especially during the third period; during the second period the

Jewish population remained remarkably stationary, while a much larger number of Jews

departed from Poland.

Lion Feuchtwanger, et al, Der Gelbe Fleck: die Ausrottung van 500,000 deutschen Juden (The

Yellow Spot: the Extermination of 500,000 German Jews, Paris, 1936) presented a typical effort

during the second phase to mobilize the forces of Jewish propaganda against Germany. The

yellow spot on a black field was a medieval designation for Jewish establishments; the book

derives part of its title from this source. The other part, concerning the alleged annihilation

campaign, is asserted from the earliest pages. It is important to note that from the very start the

Jewish opponents of National Socialism declared mere measures of discrimination against the

Jews to be the equivalent of annihilation or liquidation. The term genocide was not introduced by

Professor Rafael Lemkin until after the battle of Stalingrad in 1943.

This alleged annihilation in The Yellow Spot is conceived of in several different ways. On the

one hand, simple emigration is regarded as the extermination of German Jewry as such in one

special sense at least. On the other hand, sinister rumors are cited to the effect that there would

—  4  —

———————– Page 5———————–

be a gigantic Old Testament-styled Purim in reverse in the event of a foreign invasion of Germany,

and that Jewish corpses would be prominently displayed in such a case. The existing concentration

camps are also interpreted as a potential instrument of extermination, and the latter part of the

book contains a list of prisoners who had allegedly died in the camps. Special note was made of

the claim that there was still 100 Jews at Dachau in 1936 and that 60 of them had been there

since 1933.

The authors explained the National Socialist campaign against the Jews as a Machiavellian

maneuver to create jobs for loyal brown-shirted followers. They stated as a dogmatic fact that

Hitler intended to start an “imperialist war” (note the Marxist- terminology) as soon as possible,

and especially when he could accomplish something in his domestic program-ostensibly at the

expense of the Jews-for which the people would sacrifice. The mass of the German people were

described as friendly toward the Jews despite Hitler, and the otherwise loyal German Jews were

considered -to have been forced into opposition by the measures directed against them.

Much was made of the Saturday, April 1, 1933, National Socialist boycott against the Jews,

which was actually in response to the Jewish boycotts directed against Germany from New York

and London during the previous months. The boycott was depicted as the prelude to a permanent

policy of strangulation. The alleged increase in marriages between Germans and German Jews in

1934 was regarded as a major reason for the promulgation of the Nuremberg laws as early as 1935.

The Nuremberg laws were presented as a state bulwark in support of an unpopular policy.

This story of Jewish grievances against Germany prior to World War 11 was fully supplemented

in order to cover the whole period by F. R. Brenenfeld, The Germans and the Jews (N.Y., 1939).

His emphasis was an economic and social discrimination against the Jews and on the alleged

mistreatment of concentration camp inmates, of which the Jews were always decidedly in the

minority.

A later Jewish historian, T. L. Jarman, The Rise and Fall of Nazi Germany (N.Y., 1956) noted

that at the beginning of World War 11 the Germans had only six concentration camps: Dachau,

Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, Mauthausen, Flossenbürg, and Ravensbrück. There were 21,300

inmates in the camps, of whom less than 3,000 were Jews. Jarman pointed out that under National

Socialism, terrorism unlike in Russia, was kept in the background. Jarman added that “Germany

in the years 1933-9 was an open country in a sense in which Soviet Russia has never been” (P. 187).

Jarman believed that the Germans were “stupid” in allowing themselves to be “drawn into war”

in 1939, as in 1914, when they had everything to lose and nothing to gain. It is interesting to note

that this interpretation was rendered possible because of the fact that the terroristic Soviet

regime was far more popular in the West than the much milder German system.

As time went on it became more and more doubtful whether President Roosevelt’s early assurance

to the German leaders about the Jewish question would be kept. President Roosevelt bad told

Germany’s Reichsbank president, Hjalmar Schacht, on May 6, 1933, that he personally had no

particular sympathy for the Jews, but a problem troubling German-American relations existed

because of “the old Anglo-Saxon sense of chivalry toward the weak.” Nevertheless, Roosevelt

assured Schacht that “this hurdle would be cleared” without any lasting breach in German-

American relations. Schacht met with New York Jews on May 12, 1933, and warned them that

continued pressure from the outside could make matters worse for the German Jews. These matters

are revealed in Documents on German Foreign Policy, Series C. vol. 1, nos. 214, 233.

Jewish propaganda against Germany made increasing headway during the months which

followed, and on December 20, 1933, a conference at the German Foreign Office concluded with

regret that the American press as a whole seemed to be “the strongest Jewish propaganda

machine in the world” (Ibid., vol. 2, no. 139). Richard Sallet reported from the German Embassy

in Washington, D. C. on August 3, 1934, that the sustained Jewish economic boycott of Germany

continued to add fuel to the fire, and he noted, that Jewish propaganda was more strident than

ever. The United States was seen to be positively flooded with anti-Gennan literature, and

Sallet concluded that the ultimate objective of Jewry was a war of destruction against Germany

(Ibid., vol. 3, no. 569). There was considerable relief in Germany in 1936 when President Roosevelt

refused to accede to Jewish pressure to boycott the Olympic Games at Berlin. Hjalmar Schacht, 76

Jahre meines Lebens (76 Years of My Life, Bad Wörighofen, 1953, p. 416), was confident then that

—  5  —

———————– Page 6———————–

the Jewish question, despite the ever increasing spate of Jewish propaganda, would do no lasting

harm to Germany’s relations abroad.

5. The Tension and Crisis of 1938

The situation became much worse again in 1938. Considerable German attention had been given to

the encouragement under equitable terms of Jewish emigration as a means of permanently solving

the Jewish question in Germany, but many more Jews had departed from Poland than from

Germany during the period 1933-1938. A veritable competition had developed between Germany

and Poland in encouraging emigration from their respective countries. The Polish Seim had

passed a number of stringent anti-Jewish laws in March 1938.

Early in 1938 the American press was flooded with rumors about similar actions by the National

Socialists, first in Germany, and then in Austria, and it was necessary for American diplomats on

the spot to deal with these matters. A few examples will suffice to illustrate this situation. On

January 17, 1938, the American Embassy in Berlin denied the rumor that Jewish doctors and

dentists had been deprived of their participation in the compulsory insurance program

(Ortskrankenkassen). On January 26, 1938, the Embassy denied the American press rumor that

there had been any order restricting Jewish passports or travel opportunities from Germany. On

March 25, 1938, John C. Wiley, from the American consulate in Vienna, denied the extravagant

rumors of general pogroms following the Anschluss, and he added that “so far as I know there

have been no Jewish deaths by violence” (Foreign Relations of the United States, 1938, vol. 2, pp.

355-9).

Nevertheless, on June 18, 1938, there, was organized picketing of Jewish shops in Berlin for the

first time since 1933, and Hugh Wilson, who reported from the American Embassy that 3,000

additional Jews had come to Berlin from the provinces in recent months, warned that

dissatisfaction was being expressed in the German press with the slow rate of Jewish emigration

from Germany. A long-expected blow against the Jewish position in Germany was struck by a law

of October 14, 1938 according to which Jewish lawyers in Germany were to retire from general

practice by November 30, 1938 and in Austria by December 31, 1938. Wilson reported that in early

1938 no less than 10 per cent of the practicing lawyers in Hitler’s anti-Jewish Third Reich were

Jews. This was true despite the fact that the Jews constituted less than .5 per cent of the German

population (Ibid., vol. 2, pp. 380-391). In his book, Germany and World Peace (London, 1937), the

eminent Swedish scientist and explorer, Sven Hedin, who had been a close student of German

affairs, stated that under the Weimar Republic the Jews provided 23 per cent of the practicing

lawyers in Germany although the Jews made up only .8 per cent of the total German population.

It was in this tense situation that the Polish Government decided on October 15, 1938, to

implement a law passed the previous March according to which individuals who had remained

outside Poland for a period of years could be declared stateless by the competent Polish consular

authorities. This meant that an estimated 55,000 Polish Jews living in Germany by choice could

be stranded there permanently — through the unilateral action — of the Warsaw Government.

Similar restrictions in 1885 by the Tsarist Government had prompted Bismarck, who was by no

means unfriendly toward the Jews, to deport foreign Jews to the Russian Empire.

The German Foreign Office made several vain attempts to persuade the Poles to cancel their

decree. Because October 29, 1938, was the deadline on the renewal of the Polish passports, the

Germans began on October 27th to organize deportation transports of Polish Jews. Special care was

taken to see that the travelers would have ample facilities on the transport trains, including

plenty of space and good food. Some trains managed to cross the border, but the Poles soon began to

resist, even before the passport deadline, and the entire action had to be abandoned before less

than one-third of the 55,000 Polish Jews of Germany had been returned to Poland.

This strange and tragic situation produced important repercussions. Wolfgang Diewerge, Der Fall

Gustloff (The Gustloff Case, Munich, 1936, pp. 108ff.), has recorded the threat of Propaganda

Minister Joseph Goebbels in 1936 that further assassinations of German officials by Jews, as in the

caste of Gustloff’s assassination by David Frankfurter, would lead to reprisals against German

Jewry. Now a test situation for this threat had arrived.

—  6  —

———————– Page 7———————–

The parents and sisters of Herschel Grynszpan, a syphilitic degenerate living in Paris, had been

on one of the German transports to Poland. Grynszpan received a postcard from one, of his sisters

on November 3, 1938, which described the situation but did not contain any special complaint.

Grynszpan decided to murder German Ambassador Welezeck in Paris, but instead he fired his

revolver casually at Embassy Counsellor Ernst von Rath after he failed to encounter Welczeek.

This was on the morning of November 7, 1938, and von Rath died forty-eight hours later.

This situation was exploited by Goebbels to increase the severity of German policy toward the

German Jews. Many Jewish synagogues were set on fire by organized S.A. groups on November 10,

1938, and much Jewish business property was ransacked or damaged by the same demonstrators.

Hitler ordered Himmler’s SS to intervene and put an end to the violence. These demonstrations

against the Jews were not pogroms like those in Tsarist Russia because no Jews lost their lives. The

mass of Germans were horrified by the destruction of Jewish property, which was contrary to

their sense of decency and feeling for law and order. Goebbels, however, welcomed the incident as

a turning-point which would lead to the elimination of Jewish influence in Germany. Hugh

Wilson, who was about to be recalled from Germany as part of an American protest, reported on

November 16th that the British diplomats in Berlin were more complacent about the Jewish

question. They noted that German public opinion was not behind the recent anti-Jewish measures,

and they wisely concluded that this type of action would not be repeated. This was the last

report which Wilson sent to Secretary of State Hull before leaving the country (FRUS, 1938, 2,

pp. 398-402).

Hitler was persuaded by Goebbels after the demonstrations to levy a one billion Mark (250

million dollar) fine on the wealthy and moderately wealthy Jews of Germany. Goebbels argued

that otherwise the Jews would be able to pocket vast amounts of money from the German insurance

companies, because the assets damaged or destroyed on November 10, 1938 had been heavily

insured. The poorer Jews, who had less than 5,000 Marks in immediate assets, were exempted.

The German insurance companies were ordered to pay the Jews promptly for all damages suffered

to property on November 10th, and it was permissable for the Jews to use part of this money in

paying the fine over four installments between December 15, 1938 and August 15, 1939. A further

German law was announced on November 9-6, 1938, to eliminate Jewish retail stores by January 1,

1939. At the same time, it was promised that welfare care, pensions, and other state relief

measures on behalf of the Jews would be continued. There were no new developments of

consequence in German policy toward the Jews prior to the outbreak of World War II. At the same

time, it should not be surprising that the events of November, 1938 greatly accelerated the

emigration of Jews from Germany, and, in this sense, the aims of Goebbels were realized (Vide H.

Heiber, “Der Fall Gruenspan”, in Vierteliahrshefte fuer Zeitgeschichte, April, 1957).

It can be stated in summary that German policy toward the Jews prior to World War II consisted

mainly of legislative pressure, and of a few public occasions of violence in which, however, no

Jews were actually killed. No doubt some Jewish lives were lost in German concentration camps

prior to World War II, but certainly there was no deliberate policy of killing Jews as such, and

the proportion of Jews affected was far smaller than that of Germans subjected to similar

treatment.

The purpose of the German campaign against the Jews was to eliminate the powerful Jewish

economic, political, cultural influence within Germany, and latterly, with increasing emphasis,

to promote the total emigration of the Jewish population from Germany. The purpose of the

organized Jewish counter-measures was to promote a military crusade of neighboring states

against Germany in the hope of securing the total destruction of the German National Socialist

state by means of war. It goes without saying that there were many enlightened Jews who did not

share this objective just as there were moderate forces constantly at work within the German

leadership to secure a more generous policy toward the Jews than Hitler had hitherto employed.

It may be useful at this point to give a few population statistics bearing on the period before the

war and that of wartime. It is estimated that the number of Jews in Germany when Hitler became

Chancellor in January 1933, was approximately 500,000. There were large additions toward the

end of the pre-war period due to the annexation of Austria and the Sudetenland and the

establishment of a protectorate over Bohemia and Moravia. The anti-Jewish attitude, policies

—  7  —

———————– Page 8———————–

and measures had encouraged extensive migration of Jews from these areas controlled by National

Socialist Germany. It is estimated that about 320,000 left Germany between January, 1933, and

September, 1939. Some 480,000 emigrated from Austria, the Sudetenland and Bohemia-Moravia

before the war broke out. There were about 360,000 Jews in areas under German control when war

came in September, 1939, and of these some 65,000 left during the war.

6. The Legend of the Depravity of Hitler and National Socialism

The National Socialist campaign against the Jews ended in total defeat and in death for Hitler

on April 30, 1945. This result was produced by Germany’s involvement in World War II. A

tremendous campaign has been sustained since that date to depict Hitler as the most evil and

wicked man who has ever lived, and to brand forever with shame the German nation which

submitted to his leadership. The exploitation of the circumstances concerning Hitler’s wartime

treatment of -the Jews was and remains the decisive factor in this campaign.

The essence of the charge of unprecedented monstrosity against Hitler is that under his orders

some six million Jews were exterminated in seried gas ovens that had been erected for this purpose

in all the numerous concentration camps that existed before the war in Germany and in those

which were opened later on in territories conquered by the advancing German armies. There has

never been any valid evidence brought forward to support this charge in general, and the six

million figure was purely conjectural from the beginning, having been set forth in the midst of the

war, when any such extent of extermination would have been impossible, if the six million figure

is to be accepted as the total number of Jews exterminated during the whole war period. If six

million Jews had been exterminated by 1943, then by May, 1945, at least ten millions should have

been done away with, provided Hitler and his cohorts could have got their hands on that many

Jews which, of course, they could not have done.

So far as can be discovered to date, the first time this charge of mass extermination of Jews

throughout Europe was advanced against Hitler and his government took place in a book by a

Polish-Jewish jurist, Rafael Lemkin, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, which appeared in 1943. He

contended that the Nazis had gassed millions of Jews, perhaps as many as six millions. This

precise figure was first confirmed by the New Jewish Frontier early in 1945. Tortured witnesses for

the Nuremberg Trials confirmed this figure when they did not exceed it, although the prosecution

at Nuremberg was willing to settle for around four millions as the number that had been

exterminated. Although totally ignorant of the facts, President Truman stated that six millions

was the correct number and often repeated this figure, thus giving it official status. He cynically

stated that his desire to please the Jews was due to the fact that there were many more Jewish

than Arab voters in the United States.

The six million figure has stuck, mainly due to the fact that the Jews have recognized that it is

difficult enough to sustain any such figure and that to go beyond it would only add the ridiculous

to the unsubstantiated, although the figure has often been casually lifted to seven or eight

millions in the press. The linking of the reparations paid by West Germany to Israel and to

German Jews to the six million figure has provided a strong vested financial interest in

perpetuating this estimate.

Before examining the literature of the. legend of the extermination of six million Jews, it may be

desirable to outline the general situation. There can be no decisive solution of the problem on a

statistical basis for the figures are not available in any finality or decisive fashion. It is not

known precisely bow many Jews were under German control at any time during the war, to say

nothing of what the Germans did with them after they were able to get their hands on them. No

one knows with any certainty how many Jews were in the territory ultimately occupied by the

Germans before the attack on Russia on June 22, 1941, or what happened to them after the attack.

It is uncertain how many fled back into Russia before the German advance. Nor does anybody

know how many Jews were slaughtered by various Slavic peoples before the Germans arrived.

There is plenty of evidence that Slavic peoples other than the Russians were more prone to kill

Jews after war broke out than were the Germans, save for Jews operating among the Russian

partisans. There are no accurate statistics as to how many Jews fled to Russia, to Palestine, to

other European countries, and to the United States during the war. Nor are there any reliable

—  8  —

———————– Page 9———————–

figures as to how many Jews in areas occupied by the Germans survived the war. During the war,

as well as before, the Germans were far more eager to expel Jews than to intern them, if and when

it was possible to arrange emigration. This was not so easy to do in wartime.

Jewish statisticians have done their best to magnify the number of Jews in the future occupied

areas be-fore September, 1939, and June, 1941, and to reduce almost fantastically the number that

remained alive in June, 1945. There is no probability that the needed statistics can ever be

recovered in any satisfactory manner. Both the Jews and the Russians may be counted upon to

suppress such statistics as they possess because of the likelihood that they would, expose the

extent of the fraud involved. Unless the Russians should some time establish unity and rapport

with the Germans they are never likely to release any figures which would lessen the indictment

of the Germans relative to the extermination legend. The best that can be done is to produce the

figures and related considerations which do now prove that it would have been entirely

impossible for the Germans to have exterminated six million Jews, even if they bad decided from

the first to do so, and of any such policy there is no proof whatsoever.

We know that there were about 360,000 Jews under German control in September, 1939, in

Germany, Austria, the Sudetenland and Bohemia-Moravia. There were about 1,100,000 Jews in

that part of Poland occupied by the Germans in 1939-1940. There were approximately 1,150,000

Jews in eastern Poland which was taken over by the Russians in the autumn of 1939. How many of

these escaped into Russia ahead of the German drive after June, 1941, is unknown. There is no

doubt that the Germans took over large numbers of Jews during -their invasion -of Russia, but it is

very likely that at no time during the war did the Germans have control over more than 3,500,000

to 4,000,000 Jews, and many of these could not be withdrawn before the Russians occupied these

areas again. One thing is relatively certain, and that is that the Germans never got their hands

on as many as six million Jews during the war. To have exterminated six millions would have

made it necessary for them to have executed every last Jew that they seized. Not even the

upholders of the extermination legend allege that this was the case, since they portray great

numbers of Jews used in labor operations at all the German concentration camps.

While it was the usual German policy during the war to intern Jews to prevent subversion and.

espionage, to suppress partisan activities, and to secure Jews for the labor force, the German

practice of interning Jews was no such sweeping process as took place with the treatment of the

Japanese by the United States and Canada. After the war, Philip Auerbach, the Jewish

attorney-general of the Bavarian State Office for Restitution, claimed that the Germans

interned no less than eleven million Jews, but in the light of all the even partially reliable

figures it is doubtful if they interned as many as two million, and not all of these were put in

concentration camps. Some were placed in Jewish community centers like that at Theresienstadt,

where they were governed by Jews. Not only such population figures as we possess but also

considerations of logistics make it impossible to credit any such figure as eleven millions, or even

six millions. To have transported, interned, administered, fed and clothed six million Jews would

have paralyzed German military operations on the vast eastern front. It would have been a

terrific task to have gathered, interned and cared for three million Jews.

In the early days of the launching of the extermination legend it was maintained that there were

gas chambers in all of the German concentration camps and that great numbers of Jews were

exterminated in all of them. But after the occupation of West Germany by the Americans, British

and French -there were many honest observers in the occupation forces who visited these camps

and found and reported that no gas chambers existed there. It was then contended that most of the

gas ovens were concentrated at Auschwitz in southern. Poland, which was then under Russian

control. The Russians refused to allow any visitors there for about ten years after the war, by

which time the Russians were able to revamp Auschwitz in such a manner as to give some

plausibility to the claim that large numbers of Jews had been gassed there. It is significant,

however, that no living, authentic eye-witness of the gassing of Jews at Auschwitz has ever been

produced and validated.

It has continued to, be maintained that about half of the entire six million Jews said to have been

gassed by the Germans were gassed at Auschwitz, but even the Jewish statistician, Gerald

Reitlinger, admits that only 363,000 inmates were registered at Auschwitz from January, 1940, to

—  9  —

———————– Page 10———————–

February, 1945, and not all -of these were Jews. The supporters 4 the genocide legend con-tend that

many at Auschwitz were not registered but they have brought no proof of this. Even if one admits

that there were as many who were unregistered as were registered, that would make less than

750,000 altogether. lit would have been very difficult to have gassed about three millions with

only 750,000 to work ,,on, although it has been frequently asserted by dogmatic but uninformed

writers that from four to five million Jews were gassed at Auschwitz. Moreover, many who were

sent to Auschwitz were -shifted elsewhere, especially toward the end of the war when the

Russians were advancing.

Here, again, logistics supplement registration and population data in undermining the

extermination myth. To have brought three million Jews, and a considerable number of Gentiles to

Auschwitz would have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities

which were strained to the limit in supporting the far-flung eastern military front, especially

after the war began to turn against the Germans. There is no probability that the Germans would

have risked their military fortunes to the extent required to convey three million persons to

Auschwitz and care for them there. Hence, both population figures and logistics combine to

discredit the legend of six million Jews being gassed in all camps under German control, as well as

of about three millions being gassed at Auschwitz.

Joined with all this are the facts which will be developed later on showing that there is no

evidence that the Germans adopted any program of mass extermination of Jews during the war or

that any German National Socialist leader ever gave any order to do so. It has been alleged by

numerous Jewish critics of Hitler, especially Gerald Reitlinger, that early in the war the Nazi

leaders decided on a “final solution” of the Jewish problem and that this solution was the

extermination of all the Jews they could seize. There is no foundation whatever for this charge.

Hitler, Himmler and Goebbels did determine upon a “final solution” of the Jewish problem, so far

as they could control it, but this solution was to encourage or force the Jews to leave all lands that

the National Socialists controlled and to settle elsewhere. Emigration rather than extermination

was the solution proposed by all of these Nazi leaders. Not even the Nuremberg inquisition could

link Göring in any serious manner with the Jewish issue, but there is no doubt that he shared the

program of encouraging -the Jews to leave all territory that Germany controlled or might control.

7. The Nature of some Jewish Memoirs and Reminiscences of Concentration Camp Experiences

during World War II

One may well consider today the feelings of any alert and patriotic German on reading Eugene

Heimler’s Night of the Mist (N.Y., 1960). This highly praised and widely celebrated book

consists of alleged memoirs from the years 1944 and 1945. The hero is a sensitive young Jewish

poet of Hungary who awakens on March 19, 1944, to discover that the Nazis are occupying the

country because of Regent Horthy’s attempt to conclude a military armistice with the Soviet

Union.

The arrival of the Nazis is considered by every Jew to be a death warrant. The hero is persuaded

to hide as a patient in a mental hospital. After some time he sneaks out to marry his sweetheart,

Eva. They are rounded up along with other Jews, and on July 4, 1944, they are packed off to

Auschwitz concentration camp in a cattle truck. A German officer promises them excellent

treatment, but one of the captives is allegedly killed by an SS guard during the journey. The hero

testifies that he was twice severely beaten after his arrival. He has not been long at the camp

when he learns that his wife has died of dysentery. He has a passionate love affair with a

gypsy girl, Cara, for several weeks, but one day she is no longer at their hideaway in the camp to

embrace him, and he assumes that she has been killed.

The hero finds himself at Buchenwald by August, 1944, his stay at Auschwitz apparently having

lasted a very brief time. He works in a factory, and later in one of the camp kitchens, where the

SS place him in charge of a group of non-Jewish people, working there. An elderly German Social

Democrat inmate screams that he will not work along with a Jew, but the hero pacifies him by

threatening to beat him. The sound of artillery later reveals the approach of the American

forces, but the SS compel a group of inmates to march with them to Bohemia. There they are

overtaken by the end of the war, and the hero returns to Hungary. He has managed to survive, but

—  10  —

———————– Page 11———————–

he is sickened by the alleged effort of Hitler to annihilate every Jew in German occupied Europe,

although he has never actually seen anyone gassed.

Primo Levi, If This is a Man (N.Y., 1959), recounted his alleged experiences as a frail young

Italian Jew caught in the Nazi vice. Mussolini had established his Italian Social Republic, and

the hero, who has been roaming about the countryside in search of plunder, is captured by Fascist

militia on December 13, 1943. This terminates his career as a volunteer with the Communist

Italian partisans seeking to overthrow Mussolini. He is taken in January, 1944, to the Italian

detention camp at Fossoli near Modena.

German officials arrive at Fossoli on a visit, and they complain that conditions and facilities for

the prisoners are not sufficiently healthy. There is an announcement on February 22, 1944, that a

small group of 650 Jews will be sent to Germany. The hero reaches Auschwitz, where he is

assigned to work in the Buna synthetic rubber factory. Conditions are wretched, and the humdrum

Sunday concerts and football matches are no consolation for him. He receives a camp tattoo nunber

on his arm signifying that he has become merely another cipher. There are constantly rumors

that most of the Jews will end their lives in gas chambers.

Hungarian becomes the second language in his camp area next to Yiddish after the spring of 1944,

because the Nazis have been able to lay hands on so many Hungarian Jews. There are excellent

camp news facilities for the inmates. They learn at once of the Allied landings in Normandy and

of the attempt on Hitler’s life in 1944. Auschwitz is bombarded from the air by Allied planes;

both the attitudes of the guards and the conditions in the camp become progressively worse. At

last the Russians approach Auschwitz. The camp is evacuated on January 18, 1945, but many of

the sick prisoners are left behind. The hero is one of them, and he is freed by the Russians on

January 27, 1945. This is a joyous occasion for him which be celebrates with great enthusiasm.

Levi and Heimler agree that the main purpose of the Nazis has been to liquidate as many Jews as

possible. Another former Auschwitz inmate, Miklos Nyiszli, Auschwitz: a Doctor’s Eye-Witness

Account (N.Y., 1960), has contended that adequate facilities existed there to liquidate the Jews

of all Europe. These men consider themselves extremely fortunate to have avoided contact with

gas chambers and crematoria about which so many dreadful stories have been circulated.

The German reader might wonder what Regent Horthy of Hungary and Premier Mussolini of

Italy thought about the high-handed manner in which Hitler is said to have prompted his loyal

SS to dispose of the fate of Hungarian and Italian subjects. Nicholas Horthy complained in his

Memoirs (N.Y., 1957, pp. 174ff.) that the Jewish minority in Hungary prior to World War II

received no less than 25 per cent of the national income, and that the Jewish problem was a

serious one for Hungarians. He also maintained that, in 1939, Hitler favored a peaceful

accomodation with Poland and that the war was forced upon Germany. Nevertheless, Horthy

did everything possible to protect Hungarian Jews from German interference as long as he was in

control of his country. The same was true of Mussolini, who became more dependent on Hitler after

Otto Skorzeny rescued the Italian leader from prison following his initial overthrow in July,

1943.

Luigi Villari, Italian Foreign Policy under Mussolini (N.Y., 1956, pp. 197ff.), has explained that

the Duce also did everything he could until 1945 to prevent German interference with Italian Jews

and to intercede on their behalf when they were transported to Germany. This was true despite

the fact that Mussolini was sincerely, opposed to Jewish influence in Italy. A German observer

would not fail to note the contrast between the mildly critical attitudes and policies of Horthy

and Mussolini toward the Jews and the openly anti-Jewish policy of Hitler.

The sensibilities of Mussolini in the Jewish question were well-known to Heinrich Himmler, the

top German SS leader. He told Mussolini on October 11, 1942, during a visit to Rome, that German

policy toward the Jews had gradually taken on a new aspect during wartime solely for reasons of

military security. Himmler complained that thousands of Jews in the German-occupied

territories were partisans or had conducted sabotage and espionage. Chaim Weizmann, the

Zionist leader of the Jewish agency in London, had declared war on Germany on behalf of all Jews

throughout the world as early as September 5, 1939. It was because of the critical stage of the war

that Himmler now defended the new German policy of transporting Jews in occupied territories to

restricted regions and internment camps.

—  11  —

———————– Page 12———————–

Himmler complained that there had been cases of Jewish women and children working with the

partisans in the USSR, and he admitted that many Jews actually apprehended in partisan

activities in that area had been summarily shot by German military units. Himmler also referred

to captured Soviet Jews engaged in military construction work under conditions in which be

admitted that the death-rate was probably higher than normal. Mussolini firmly reminded

Himmler that the Catholic Church was strongly opposed to any extreme measures against the

Jews, and he intimated that a policy of German excesses might change the attitude of Pope Pius

XII, who favored an Axis victory over the USSR in World War II (Vierteliahrshefte für

Zeitgeschichte, 1956/4).

Himmler’s references to the resistance of Soviet Jews was intended to justify the tougher German

policy toward the Jews which began with the outbreak of the Russo-German war on June 22, 1941.

A Canadian Jewish journalist, Raymond Arthur Davies, Odyssey through Hell (N.Y., 1946),

stated that the Soviet Red Army should receive the principal credit for saving Jewish lives in

Europe during World War II. Davies extolled the military achievements of Soviet Jews both as

partisans and regulars on both sides of the front. Schachno Epstein, the chief of the Anti-Fascist

Committee of Soviet Jews, told Davies that the Soviet Union, by evacuating Jews and by other

measures, had saved the lives of at least 3,500,000 European Jews. Incidentally, this would have

made it rather difficult for the Nazis to get hold of 6,000,000 to exterminate.

Davies spent most of the war in the Soviet Union, and be was convinced that in no other

belligerent country bad the Jewish role attained comparable significance. He emphasized that

thousands of Soviet war plants were managed by Jews, and that a remarkably large number of

Jews held top positions in the Soviet armed forces and administration. He noted that 250,000

Polish Jews from the German sphere of occupation fled to the USSR in 1939, and they were to be

encountered in every Soviet province. He had received official Soviet information that no less

than 35,000 European Jews were fighting for Tito in the illegal partisan war against Germany. He

surmised that most of Rumania’s Jews bad emerged from the war unscathed because of the impact

on Rumanian policy of Germany’s defeat at Stalingrad. Davies enjoyed contacts with many

American Jews who had emigrated to the USSR in the 1930’s and were playing a prominent part

in the Communist war effort. He also encountered many Jewish Red Army officers who boasted of

killing their regular German army prisoners in gigantic mass executions. Davies entered Berlin

with the Red Army, and he pronounced the wanton destruction and rape of that city equitable

and just. Davies immediately established close contacts with the leaders of the Berlin Jewish

community after the Reich capital fell. One of the prominent members of the Berlin Jewish

community was Hildegard Benjamin, who later, as Communist, Minister of justice in Soviety

Central Germany, compelled the Germans to accept the Soviet, legal system instead of keeping

one of their own.

Davies rejoiced that these thousands of Berlin Jews had also been liberated by the Soviets and

not by the West. He was convinced that Zionism had become superfluous for Jews in the Soviet

environment despite the fact that anti-Jewish feeling persisted at the grass-roots level in many

parts of the USSR.

Ralph Nunberg, The Fighting Jew (N.Y., 1945), offered an equally graphic account of the role of

the Soviet Jews in World War II. Nunberg noted with pride that no less than 313 Soviet front line

generals were Jews. He saw the USSR victorious under the aegis of Karl Marx, another “fighting

Jew” (Ibid., p. 198).

Nunberg admitted -that many Jews from Central Europe, as well as from other parts of the world,

had been victims of the gigantic Soviet purges between 1936 and 1939, but this slaughter was

incidental and ideological and was not part of an openly anti-Jewish policy on the part of Stalin.

The USSR and some of her later satellites were the only countries in the world where anti-Jewish

utterances were a capital offense. But Soviet initiative did lead to the deportation. of

“undesirable” Jews to Germany during the period of the 1939-1941 Russo-German non-aggression

pact.

Margarete Buber, Under Two Dictators, (London, 1950), presented the memoirs of a German-

Jewish woman who was sent to the German concentration camp at Ravensbrück in August, 1940,

after spending several years in the brutal and primitive conditions of a Russian concentration

—  12  —

———————– Page 13———————–

camp. She was considered to be too dangerous to be given her freedom in Germany, and she noted

that she was the only Jewish person in her contingent of deportees from Russia who was not

released forthwith by the Gestapo. She found that conditions in Ravensbrück presented a striking

contrast to the filth, disorder, and starvation of her Russian camp.

German concentration camps in August, 1940, were few and far between, and the number of

prisoners was small in contrast to the vast camps of the Soviets. The number of inmates in all

German camps at the outbreak of war in September 1939 has been previously cited at 21,300. Most

of these inmates were the usual types of criminals, and there was only a small percentage of

Jewish people. After one year of war, the total concentration camp population was still less than

40,000 in contrast to the many millions detained in the USSR camps.

The camp the heroine entered at Ravensbrück was immaculately clean with spacious lawns and

flower beds. Regular baths, and a change of linen every week seemed sheer luxury after her

earlier experiences. At a first meal consisting of white bread, sausage, margarine and sweet

porridge with dried fruit, the heroine could not resist asking her neighbor at table if August 3,

1940, was some sort of holiday or special occasion. Her neighbor was quite blank, and the heroine

proceeded to ask if the food was always so good. The neighbor replied in the affirmative, but she

wondered why anyone should be so pleased with it. The heroine did not attempt an explanation.

She also considered her barracks at Ravensbrück a palace compared to her crowded mud hut in

the Soviet camp. Her first Sunday meal of goulash, red cabbage, and potatoes was a veritable

feast. The heroine spent many years at Ravensbrück. The camp was crowded by 1943. Some of the

old cleanliness was lost, and many flowers were trampled down. This was a consequence of the

never-ending war. Prisoners from Auschwitz and other camps poured in toward the end of the

war. The heroine noted that the Auschwitz inmates arrived “half-starved and exhausted” early

in 1945. It should be recalled that tens of thousands of eastern German refugees literally died of

starvation during this same period.

All postal communication between the Ravensbrück inmates and the outside world ceased in

January, 1945, and confusion reigned. At last the end came, the German guards fled, and the

heroine was released. She had witnessed the progressive deterioration of conditions at the camp

over a long period. Corporal punishment for major offenses had been introduced after her arrival,

and since the winter of 1941-1942, she had heard the usual malicious rumors that gas executions

were being practiced in some cases.

Another Ravensbrück Communist political prisoner, Charlotte Bormann, has insisted in Die

Gestapo läßt bitten (The Gestapo Invites You), that the rumors of gas executions were tendentious

inventions deliberately circulated among the prisoners by the Communists. Margarete Buber was

not accepted by this group because of her imprisonment in the USSR. Charlotte Bormann’s

memoirs never found a publisher, and she was not permitted by the prosecution to testify at the

Rastadt trial of the Ravensbrück camp leaders in the French occupation zone. This has been the

usual and typical fate of authors seeking to present the story from the side of those who denied

the extermination legend.

8. The Weissberg Tale

An example of one of the Jewish Communist deportees from the Soviet Union who managed to

escape German confinement throughout the war was Alexander WeissbergCybulski, Hexensabbat

(Frankfurt a.M., 1951; Am. ed., The Accused, N.Y., 1951). He was born in Cracow and retained

Austrian citizenship after 1938. He was a prominent scientific engineer in the second Soviet Five

Year Plan until his arrest during the 1937 purge. Albert Einstein vainly interceded with Stalin on

his behalf in 1938. Weissberg has written the most informative book to date on the gigantic

Soviet purges. After he was deported by the Russians at the end of 1939, Weissberg went quietly

to Cracow where he remained until he was forced to flee from Russian occupation forces in that

city at the end of the war. Weissberg had expected the Germans to send him at once to a

concentration camp, and he had made an eloquent appeal to the Soviet authorities to permit him

to depart directly to Sweden from the USSR. His appeal was rejected.

Weissberg later produced a particularly amazing book, Die Geschichte von Joel Brand (Köln,

1956; Am. ed., Desperate Mission, N.Y., 1958). There had been international interest in the Joel

—  13  —

———————– Page 14———————–

Brand story ever since the London Times carried the news on July 20, 1934, that Brand had come

from Budapest to Istanbul with an offer from the Gestapo to permit the emigration of one million

Jews from Central Europe in the midst of the war. The Gestapo, admitted that this huge

emigration would greatly inconvenience the German war effort because of the demand on

transport facilities involved, but they were willing to undertake the plan in exchange for ten

thousand trucks to, be used exclusively on the eastern front. It goes without saying that the

acceptance of the, plan would have produced a major breach between the Soviet Union and the

Western Allies. Nevertheless, one of the Budapest Jewish leaders, Joel Brand, was in favor of

acceptance. This prompted the British to conclude that Brand was a dangerous Nazi agent. He

was whisked off to Cairo and forthwith imprisoned.

One of the, contentions of Weissberg’s book is that the German Nazis were always pursuing a zig-

zag policy throughout the war between the emigration of the Jews from Europe and their

physical extermination. Weissberg confessed at the start a complete, lack of documentary sources

to prove that Hitler ever intended the physical destruction of all Jews as such, but he

nevertheless uncritically accepted the widely-propagated myth of the liquidation of six million

Jews. He also denied Horthy of, Hungary the role of protector of the, Jews, and he claimed that

Hungary had been under a “terroristic anti-Jewish regime” ever since 1919 (Ibid., p. 9).

The Nazi personalities receiving chief emphasis in the book are Dieter Wisliceny, the, Gestapo

chief in Slovakia, and Adolf Eichmann, after 1934 the chief SS official expert on the Jewish

question in Europe, Wisliceny, after 1945, made a vain effort to save his own life by supporting

the efforts of the prosecution at Nuremberg. Eichmann was far from being as important in the

Nazi hierarchy as his position might suggest. For instance, throughout his whole career

Eichmann never once had a personal interview with Hitler.

The main thesis of the Weissberg book is that Hungarian Jews took the initiative in making

deals with the Germans, that many of their deals were successful, and that, by implication, it

would have been possible to negotiate with the Germans for the evacuation of the entire

European Jewish population during World War II, thus showing that the Hitler regime still

favored emigration as the real solution of the Jewish question. One unfortunate consequence of the

book was to point the finger of suspicion at Rudolph Kastner, the chief leader of the Hungarian

Jews. Weissberg sometimes made him appear to be almost pro-Hitler. Kastner was subsequently

murdered in Israel by a young Jewish terrorist in the midst of the frantic furor accompanying the

1955 Israeli national elections. Excerpts from Weissberg’s findings had appeared in Israeli

periodicals early in 1955.

The turbulent Hungarian situation in 1944-1945, when the valiant Magyar nation was going down

to final defeat before Communism, produced many bizarre situations, but none is more striking

than that of Raoul Wallenberg. This Swedish Jew, who had no, special diplomatic status, was

permitted by Swedish Foreign Minister Guenther to operate from the Swedish legation in

Budapest in a gigantic business venture of selling Swedish passports. It was later alleged without

any foundation that Wallenberg was murdered by the “fascist” followers of Hungarian Premier

Ferenc Szalassi. Wallenberg as a result was virtually canonized for ten years as a selfless hero

who had given his life to protect Hungarian Jews from the German Gestapo and their Hungarian

cohorts. In reality, Wallenberg had made a fortune selling passports to these same “fascists”, and

for this reason he had been arrested and deported by the Soviet occupation authorities. The

Swedish Government was fully informed of this by Alexandra Kollontay in Stockholm, but the

truth did not reach the public until publication of the article by the Jewish writer, Rudolph

Philipp, in the January 14, 1955, copy of the sensational Swedish newspaper, VI.

9. The Case of Adolf Eichmann

The fate of Adolf Eichmann reached truly monumental and sensational proportions with his so-

called capture in Argentina by Israeli agents on May 12, 1960. The Israeli authorities decided to

hold the world in suspense for an entire year before placing the former German official before a

court under conditions in which any reference to a fair trial would be merely ludicrous.

The alleged memoirs of Eichmann were uncritically published in Life, November 28, December 5,

1960, without any attention having been paid to the fact that more than one scandal had been

—  14  —

———————– Page 15———————–

caused by spurious memoirs during recent years. One need only imagine how Gerhard Ritter, the

president of the German Historical Society, felt in 1953 when it was proved that Hitlers

Tischgespraeche (Hitler’s Secret Conversations, N.Y., 1953), which he had edited for

publication in 1952, was utterly fraudulent. Nevertheless, in 1960, a record allegedly derived

from Eichmann’s comments in 1955 to a highly dubious associate were to be accepted as definitive

memoirs. They were designed to prove, of course, that “the unregenerate Nazi” Eichmann was

every inch the fiend that be has been depicted. A disarming attempt to make them seem

authentic was furnished by the touch that Eichmann did not say what his cohort, Hoettl,

claimed at Nuremberg that he had said about the alleged killing of millions of Jews (Time, June

6, 1960, reported Eichmann had said five million Jews; Newsweek, June 6, 1960, claimed he had

said six million).

The number of unlikely touches in the Life account make the performance look about as clumsy as

the typical Communist-forged memoirs. For instance, Weissberg noted that Eichmann had made

his proposal on Jewish emigration to Brand, with the specific authorization of Himmler, on

April 25, 1944, at the Hotel Majestic in Budapest. The Life account has Himmler authorizing the

exchange of Jewish emigrants for war material in 1944 “when Reichsführer Himmler took over as

commander of the reserve army.” But Himmler did not receive his active military command over

the Volkssturm until August 1944, after the July 20, 1944 assassination attempt against Hitler.

The articles in Life actually appear to be little more than a condensation of three sensational and

mutually contradictory books: Minister of Death, the Eichmann Story (N.Y., 1960, by Ephraim

Katz, Zwy Aldouby, and Quentin Reynolds); The Case Against Adolf Eichmann (N.Y., 1960, by

Henry A. Zeiger); Eichmann: the Man and His Crimes (N.Y., 1960, by Comer Clarke). It has never

been alleged that Eichmann participated in the execution of Jews, but it has been claimed that be

knowingly arranged for their deportation to places of execution.

In spite of all the international commotion and the vast barrage of irresponsible print which has

flooded the world on Eichmann since May, 1960, there is not the slightest substantial evidence

that Eichmann ever deliberately ordered even one Jew gassed in a German concentration camp, to

say nothing of having ordered and supervised the extermination of six million Jews. This would

be true even though he gave testimony at his trial that he bad been responsible for the

extermination of more than six million or wrote a book of alleged “true confessions” giving the

same or a larger figure. Any such account by Eichmann would be (1) proof of the extent and effect

of the torture and brainwashing to which be had been subjected by his Jewish captors; (2) the

result of his decision, since he knew he would be executed in any event, to provide a sensational

yarn of his elimination of Jews whom he disliked, even if he had not actually wished to destroy

them, thus caressing his ego; or (3) a product of the fact that his experience bad actually rendered

him mentally unbalanced. Perhaps all three explanations would be intermingled and blended.

The essence of the matter is that, if all the important evidence indicates that there was no

systematic and extensive extermination of Jews by Germany during the war, then no boast of such

massive achievements in extermination can be accepted as having any factual validity. They

would belong in the realm of morbid fantasy rather than sober factual reality.

10. Unconditional Surrender, the Prolongation of the War, and the Effects on Jews Under German

Control

Eichmann was allegedly responsible for the deportation of men like Heimler and Levi. Unlike

the case of Margarete Buber, the alleged concentration camp experiences of Heimler and Levi

began long after the public announcement of unconditional surrender by President Franklin D.

Roosevelt at Casablanca on January 13, 1943. The effect of this pronouncement on the prolongation

of the war and on the promotion of. Communist aims in Europe has been considered by many

experts. The desire in Germany for a compromise peace by the summer of 1942 was by no means

confined to the German opposition to Hitler. Walter Schellenberg, The Schellenberg Memoirs

(London, 1956), reveals that, as early as August, 1942, Heinrich Himmler was willing to envisage

a compromise peace approximately on the basis of Germany’s territorial position on September 1,

1939. Specific peace efforts of Himmler as early as 1942 were later confirmed from official

Swedish sources. Schellenberg was the dominant personality in the SD (SS Security Service)

—  15  —

———————– Page 16———————–

after the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich by British agents in Bohemia in 1942, and he

consistently exerted a moderating influence on Himmler.

The effect of unconditional surrender was certain to mean the prolongation of the war to the bitter

end to the benefit of Soviet Russia. General J.F.C. Fuller, The Second World War (London, 1948,

pp. 258-9), has explained that “Russia would be left the greatest military power in Europe, and,

therefore, would dominate Europe.” Colonel F. C. Miksche, Unconditional Surrender (London,

1952, p. 255), stated that “the unconditional surrender policy, proclaimed by President Roosevelt

in Casablanca and bolstered up by a frivolous propaganda, was heedlessly put into execution.”

George N. Crocker, Roosevelt’s Road to Russia (Chicago, 1959, p. 182), noted that the Germans

fought on with the couragre of despair, and that “Roosevelt’s words hung like a putrefying

albatross around the necks of America and Britain.”

The unconditional surrender pronouncement was no sudden inspiration of President Roosevelt at

Casablanca. Compton Mackenzie, Mr. Roosevelt (N.Y., 1944, p. 251), dated the genesis of the

unconditional surrender plan from the period of President Roosevelt’s ‘fireside chat’ of December

29, 1940, nearly one year before the formal entry of the United States into, World War II.

Alfred Vagts, “Unconditional Surrender — vor und nach 1943” (i.e. before and after 1943)

(Vierteliahrshefte fuer Zeitgeschichte, 1959/3) has explained in considerable detail how World

War II actually became a “crusade” along the lines of unconditional surrender from the moment

the United States formally entered the war. There was virtually no criticism of this policy

before and after Casablanca from those close to the President (William C. Bullitt was a notable

exception). Elliott Roosevelt, As He Saw It (N.Y., 1946, p. 117), declared that unconditional

surrender was as good as if “Uncle Joe” Stalin himself had invented it.

As a matter of fact, however, the idea of unconditional surrender for Germany was not actually of

American origin, despite Roosevelt’s enunciation of the slogan at Casablanca in January, 1943.

The British launched the policy; indeed, it had been basic in the war plans of Lord Halifax long

before September, 1939. It was confirmed when Halifax and the British refused to accept the

Italian plan to stop the German-Polish war early in September, 1939, a plan to which Hitler

assented. The British continued it when they refused Hitler’s offers of peace at the close of the

German-Polish war, and again when they rejected his generous peace offers after Dunkirk. The

British under both Halifax and Chamberlain, and under Churchill were determined that

Germany must be utterly destroyed.

Roosevelt, after some thought, seems to have recognized at least momentarily the folly of this

policy, and on May 23, 1944, sent a note to Churchill and Stalin suggesting that a return be made

to the policy of Woodrow Wilson and an appeal be made to the German people over the heads of

Hitler and his government, offering peace if the National Socialist government would be

overthrown. Churchill rejected it instantly, and on May 24th made a speech in the House of

Commons declaring that Britain would accept nothing short of unconditional surrender. Stalin

also vetoed Roosevelt’s suggestion on May 26th. After that, Roosevelt made no further effort to

alter the crusade for unconditional surrender (Gerhard Ritter, The German Resistance, N.Y., 1958,

p. 274; John L. Snell, Wartime Origins of the East-West Dilemma over Germany, New Orleans,

1959, p. 128).

Many books have been written about the efforts of the German opposition to Hitler in 1942 to

arrive at a satisfactory understanding with the Western Powers in order to win sufficient support

within Germany to establish, by revolutionary action, a new government, and, needless to say, not

an anti-Jewish one. Hans B. Gisevius, To the Bitter End (N.Y., 1948, p.p. 448ff.), and Fabian von

Schlabrendorff, Revolt against Hitler (N.Y., 1948, pp. 117ff.), have emphasized the importance

of a satisfactory German agreement on peace terms with the Western Powers. Allen Dulles,

Germany’s Underground (N.Y., 1947, p.p. 167ff), indicated that the author, as OSS chief

directing American espionage from Switzerland, favored a positive agreement with the German

opposition in 1942, and he was forcefully presenting his views to the American authorities at

home. Gerhard Ritter, Carl Goerdeler und die deutsche Widerstandsbewegung (Stuttgart, 1954;

Am. ed., The German Resistance, N.Y., 1958), revealed that Goerdeler, as the designated head of

the future opposition government, was in despair when he heard of the unconditional surrender

pronouncement.

—  16  —

———————– Page 17———————–

There is overwhelming evidence that American authorities had ample reason to believe that the

war might be brought to a sudden close after the North African landings and the Stalingrad

impasse had positive terms for peace been presented to Germany through German opposition

spokesmen in Switzerland. Robert Sherwood, Roosevelt and Hopkins (N.Y., 1948, pp. 650ff.) has

revealed that the primary reason for Roosevelt’s unconditional surrender announcement, when

made in 1943, was to head off a German revolt and an irresistable bid for peace even without

specific terms of encouragement from the Western Powers. At that time, Roosevelt did not appear

to want Germany to escape from final and total defeat in the field, as she had done by means of

the conditional surrender negotiations with President Wilson in 1918.

It is an incredible fact that since the war most writers critical of unconditional surrender have

concentrated almost exclusively on the unfortunate effect of the policy in prolonging the slaughter

by military action and in promoting ultimate Communist control in Europe. This is astonishing,

because, in the total scope of writing on World War II, the subject of the impact of the war on the

European Jews has received more emphasis than any other. Surely one could have expected very

early a detailed study on the implications and effects of unconditional surrender on the fate of

European Jews. It is now alleged on many sides that American Jewish leaders by the summer of

1942 were receiving reports from Europe which persuaded them that Hitler literally meant to

undertake the physical liquidation of all European Jewry. It would be logical, if these stories are

at all true, to expect that the American Jewish leaders would have been seeking to save the

European Jews from such a horrible fate through conclusion of the war as quickly as possible. This

would be the only possible effect means of succor under the alleged circumstances, namely, ending

the war. One would expect American Jewry to have been far more horrified by Roosevelt’s

unconditional surrender pronouncement in January, 1943, than even by Hitler’s appointment as

German Chancellor in January, 1933.

Henry Morgenthau, Jr., “The Refugee Run-Around” in Colliers, Nov. 1, 1947, alleged that the

United States Government knew from August, 1942, that Jews were being killed wholesale. Yet

Morgenthau and his Communist assistant, Harry Dexter White, were ardent supporters of

unconditional surrender both before and after Casablanca, and they were the American supporters

of the Russian-born plan to convert Germany into a goat pasture. This plan was adopted by

Roosevelt and Churchill at the Quebec conference in 1944, and it was soon learned by Hitler and

the remaining German opposition leaders alike.

There were plenty of prominent American Jewish leaders who might have prompted President

Roosevelt to follow the advice of Allen Dulles and to end the war, but they failed to do so.

Margaret L. Coit, Mr. Baruch (Boston, 1957, pp. 468ff.) has proved that Bernard Baruch had more

influence on President Roosevelt than did William C. Bullitt, who opposed unconditional

surrender, although Bullitt had worked hard for President Roosevelt in promoting the outbreak

of war in Europe in 1939. Baruch, like Morgenthan and other Jewish advisers of the President,

was a fervid supporter of unconditional surrender in 1942, although this policy was calculated in

any event to produce the greatest possible loss of Jewish lives.

One can only hope that an honest and well-informed Jewish writer will soon undertake a

detailed explanation of this phenomenon, which would be utterly monstrous and

incomprehensible if the reports of liquidations of the Jews in 1942 had been true. Furthermore, the

internment policy persued by the German Government after March, 1942, spelled enormous

suffering for many Jews in the context of Roosevelt’s unconditional surrender policy, quite apart

from any alleged German policy of deliberately exterminating all Jews.

The enthusiastic description by Isaac Zaar, Rescue and Liberation: America’s Part in the Birth of

Israel (N.Y., 1954, pp. 39ff.) of the big New York City Jewish rally on March 9, 1943, is sadly

ironical under these circumstances. Ben Hecht presented his tragic Jewish pageant, We Will

Never Die with a Kurt Weill musical score, Billy Rose producing, and Moss Hart directing. Only

a few weeks earlier, the public declaration of unconditional surrender by the American President

had guaranteed prolonged and unnecessary suffering to millions of European Jews as well as to

several hundred million other Europeans.

Cyrus Adler and Aaron Margalith, With Firmness in the Right: American Diplomatic Action

Affecting Jews, 1840-1945 (N.Y., 1946, pp. 418ff.), have claimed that President Roosevelt took an

—  17  —

———————– Page 18———————–

allegedly proper step on August 21, 1942, when he warned that retribution would follow any and

all deliberate excesses against Jews. The accent here was clearly on revenge rather than

immediate succor for the European Jews. An unlimited American jurisdiction in Germany after the

war tantamount to “unconditional surrender” was clearly implied in the assumption that the

United States would be in a position to secure retribution in any and every case where excesses

had taken place. One can well doubt the value of this threat, repeated on December 17, 1942, in

the context of the official unconditional surrender policy adopted the following year.

The “Emergency Conference to Save the Jews of Europe” was organized in April, 1943. The only

person connected with it who opposed unconditional surrender was Herbert Hoover, and he was

merely an honorary chairman. The solution envisaged was along the lines later taken by Joel

Brand for the emigration of the Jews from Europe while war operations continued. This was, to

put it mildly, an utopian and unsatisfactory policy compared to encouraging a speedy end of the

war. This is especially true when one considers the disinclination of this group actually to

negotiate with the Germans. The comprehensive German offer presented by Adolf Eicibmann at

Lisbon in 1940 and again from Berlin in 1941 for the emigration of the European Jews had produced

no result, and any widespread emigration of European Jews virtually ceased after the outbreak of

war between Germany and the USSR in June 1941.

The British prohibited the landing of the S.S. Struma in Palestine in March 1942, with its 769

passengers from Europe, and shortly afterward the ship sank with only one life saved. Even

worse was the earlier case of the French liner, Patria, which was burned and sunk by British

warships before Haifa on November 25, 1940, with a loss of 2,875 Jewish lives. Anthony Eden

summarized British objections to the evacuation of European Jews during wartime at a conference

in Washington, D.C. on March 27, 1943 (Adler and Margalith, Ibid., p. 396; Sherwood, Ibid., p.

717).

The Emergency Conference suggested in addition to emigration a policy of bombing the

concentration camps. The motive was not to be the one usually followed of seeking to reduce the

industrial production connected with the camps, but rather that of demolishing the camps in

their entirety. This was based on the naive assumption that the inmates would not be killed but

would be enabled to escape. It is truly inconceivable that any large numbers of inmates would

have escaped permanently. Increased loss of lives through the bombings and the destruction of

facilities to provide for the prisoners would be unavoidable. The bombing campaign actually

conducted in 1945, with its attendant slaughter and privations, undoubtedly produced the worst

conditions experienced in German concentration camps (Zaar, Ibid., p. 60).

Further efforts, within the hopeless context of unconditional surrender, except for the effective

distribution of supplies to the inmates in the camps through the International Committee of the

Red Cross, were equally feeble. President Roosevelt joined Secretary Morgenthau in sponsoring a

special War Refugee Board on January 22, 1.944. A tiny band of some 984 European Jews had been

transported under its auspices to a special refugee camp at Oswego, N.Y. by July, 1944. The

occupation of Hungary by Germany in March 1944, which probably would not have taken place

bad it not been for unconditional surrender, led to the formation of the New York Conference of

Hungarian Jews on April 2, 1944. The group urged Stalin to accelerate his military operations

against the Hungarians as the decisive means of aiding the Hungarian Jews. This was the best

help they could offer Hungarian Jewry (Zaar, Ibid., pp. 78-1141).

11. Leon Poliakov and the Wisliceny Story

The genocide legend was propagated with increased zeal after the brutal unconditional surrender

pronouncement. Numerous statements were extracted from a few of the German defendants in

Allied custody after World War 11 to document the charge that there was a gradual drift into a

policy of exterminating the Jews of Europe after the outbreak of war between Germany and the

USSR in June. 1941. ‘Many of these so-called key statements appear in Léon Poliakov and Josef

Wulf, Das Dritte Reich und die Juden: Dokumente und Aufsätze (The Third Reich and the Reich:

Documents and Articles, Berlin, 1955). Poliakov is the director of the Centre de Documentation

Juive Contemporaine in Paris, which was launched by Isaac Schneersobn in 1943 during the

German occupation. The Centre was presented with the files of the German Embassy in Paris by

—  18  —

———————– Page 19———————–

Provisional French President Charles de Gaulle in 1944. Its collection of materials on German

policy toward the Jews, 1933-1945, is more extensive than any other, including the Haifa

Document Office for Nazi Crimes and Dr. Albert Wiener’s similar Library in London.

The most celebrated of all key “documents” is the statement of Dieter Wisliceny obtained at the

Communist-controlled Bratislava prison on November 18, 1946. Wisliceny, who had been a

journalist before engaging in police work, was an assistant of Adolf Eichmann in the Jewish

Division of the Chief Reich Security Office prior to receiving his assignment in Slovakia.

Wisliceny was a nervous wreck and addicted to uncontrollable fits of sobbing for hours on end

during the period of his arrest prior to his execution.

The Wisliceny statement begins convincingly enough. It indicates that Reich SS Leader Heinrich

Himmler was an enthusiastic advocate of Jewish emigration. More than 100,000 Jews had been

persuaded to leave Austria between March, 1938, and January, 1939. This figure eventually

reached 220,000 of the total 280,000 Austrian Jews. A special Institute for Jewish emigration in

Prague had produced remarkable results in the period after March, 1939, and secured an eventual

emigration of 260,000.

The above points are indisputable, but the comment follows, allegedly from Wisliceny, that more

than three million Jews were added to the German sphere by the war in Poland in 1939. This

would be a major factual error for any expert on European Jewry. There were more than 1,130,000

Jews in the section of Poland occupied by Russia, whereas the figure of more than three million

Jews could scarcely apply even to the total territory of Poland before the war. An estimated

500,000 Jews had emigrated from Poland prior to the war. The 1931 Polish census had established

the number of Jews in Poland at 2,732,600 (Reitlinger, Die Endlösung, Berlin, 1956, p. 36). An

additional minimum of 250,000 Jews had fled from Western Poland to the Soviet occupation

sphere in 1939. If one subtracts 1,880,000 from 2,732,600 and allows for the normal Jewish

population increase, the Polish Jews under German rule at the end of 1939 could scarcely have

exceeded 1,100,000 (Gutachten des Instituts für Zeitgeschichte, Munich, 1958, p. 80).

The Wisliceny statement emphasizes that the emigration of Jews from German occupied

territories continued after the outbreak of war. The emigration of Danzig Jews by way of Rumania

and Turkey in September, 1940, is cited as a typical instance. Himmler and Eichmann had taken

over the idea of a Madagascar haven for the Jews from the Poles. The latter had sent the Michal

Lepecki expedition — accompanied by Jewish spokesmen — to Madagascar in 1937, and Theodor

Herzl, the founder of Zionism, had also considered Madagascar as a good possible basis for the

future Jewish state. Madagascar meant the “final solution” of the Jewish question to Himmler

and Eichmann. The Madagascar plan was still under discussion many months after the outbreak

of war with the USSR.

The statement of Wisliceny goes on to state that until June 1941, the conditions of Jewish life in

Germany, including Austria, and in the Bohemia-Moravia protectorate, were no worse than

before the war. The Jews in Poland had returned to their customary and traditional ghetto life,

but war plants were being located in the ghettos to provide adequate employment.

12. The Outbreak of the War with Russia June 22, 1941, and the Einsatzgruppen

Two important developments allegedly followed the outbreak of war with Russia. In July, 1941,

Hitler gave the order to execute the political commissars captured with Soviet units (there had

been 34,000 of these political agents with special powers assigned to the Red Army as early as

1939). According to the so-called Wisliceny statement, the special action units (Einsatzgruppen)

assigned both to this task and to crushing partisans were soon receiving orders to extend their

activities in a “general massacre” of Soviet Jews. In March, 1942, came the decision to concentrate

all European Jews in the Polish Government-General or in concentration camps, and this was to be

the prelude to the liquidation of European Jewry (Poliakov and Wulf, Ibid., pp. 87ff.)

The action of the Einsatzgruppen played a large role in the case presented by Soviet Prosecutor

Rudenko at Nuremberg in the major trial and also at the three later trials of SS leaders. The 1947

indictment of the four Einsatzgruppen, which were organized in May, 1941, on the eve of the

German preventive war against the USSR, was prepared with Soviet assistance by the American

prosecutor, Telford Taylor. He charged that these four groups of security troops assigned to fight

—  19  —

———————– Page 20———————–

partisans and commissars had killed not less than a million Jewish civilians in Western Russia

and the Ukraine merely because they were Jews. There were no reliable statistics to support this

claim, but Otto Ohlendorf, the chief of Einsatzgruppen D in the South, had been “persuaded” on

November 5, 1945 to sign a statement to the effect that 90,000 Jews had been killed under his

command.

Ohlendorf did not come on trial until 1948, long after the main Nuremberg trial, and by that time

he was insisting that his earlier statement had been extorted from him by torture. In his

principal speech before the 1948 tribunal, Ohlendorf denounced Philip Auerbach, the Jewish

attorney-general of the Bavarian State Office for Restitution, who had recently stated that he

was seeking compensation for his “eleven million Jews” who had suffered in concentration camps.

Ohlendorf scornfully stated that “not the minutest part” of the people for whom Auerbach was

seeking compensation had even seen a concentration camp. Ohlendorf lived to see Auerbach

convicted of embezzlement and fraud before his own execution finally took place in 1951.

Ohlendorf explained to the tribunal that his formations often had to take energetic action to

prevent massacres of Jews organized by local people in Russia behind the German front. He denied

that all the Einsatzgruppen ever employed in the war on the eastern front inflicted one quarter of

the casualties claimed by the prosecution, and he insisted that the illegal partisan warfare in

the USSR had taken a much higher toll of lives — the Soviets boasted of 500,000 — from the

regular German army. Ohlendorf wrote a bitter appeal shortly before his execution in 1951, and

he charged that the Western Allies were hypocritical in holding Germany to account by

conventional laws of warfare while engaged with a savage Soviet opponent which did not

respect those laws.

The later careful account by the brilliant English jurist, R. T. Paget, Manstein, his Campaigns and

his Trial (London, 1951) Ohlendorf was under Manstein’s command — concluded that the

prosecution, in accepting Soviet figures, exaggerated the number of casualties inflicted by the

Einsatzgruppen by more than 1000 per cent and that they distorted much further the situations in

which these casualties were generally inflicted. It has nevertheless become the popular legend

that the physical liquidation of the Jews in Europe began with the action of the Einsatzgruppen

against their Soviet enemies in 1941.

Poliakov and Wulf also cited a statement by a former collaborator of Eichmann, Dr. Wilhelm

Hoettl, to the effect that Eichmann said in December, 1944, that no less than two million Jews

had been killed by the Einsatzgruppen in the period 1941-1942. This statement was not given

weight even by the American tribunal which tried and condemned Ohlendorf. It should be noted

that Soviet East Galicia was supposed to be included in the area affected, but some 434,329 East

Galician Jews were transported westward by the Germans in the period shortly before July 1, 1943

(Gutachten des Instituts fuer Zeitgeschichte, 1958, p. 231). This gives some idea of the

“thoroughness” of this alleged total massacre of Soviet Jews in 1941-1942. Hoettl had been

employed as an American spy during the latter phase of the war, and he could be expected to say

whatever his interrogators asked of him without the usual third degree tortures and cruel

pressures. The figures of Hoettl even went beyond the wildest estimates of Soviet Prosecutor

Rudenko.

There has been no recent claim by any serious writer that a policy to exterminate European Jews

was in effect prior to war with Russia on June 22, 1941. (Earlier books, such as Gerald Abrahams,

Retribution, N.Y., 1941; and J. Ben-Jacob, The fewish Struggle, N.Y., 1942, did make such claims.)

Leon Poliakov, Harvest of Hate: the Nazi Program for the Destruction of the Jews of Europe

(N.Y., 1954, pp. 108ff.) admits that no document confirming an extermination policy before that

date has been discovered. He puts it this way: “The three or four people chiefly involved in the

actual drawing up of the plan for total extermination are dead and no documents have survived;

perhaps none ever existed.” The implications of this statement are clear. The vague reference of

“three or four people” indicates that the alleged plan is actually a nebulous assumption on the

part of the writer.

In the absence of evidence Poliakov assumed that a plan to exterminate the Jews must have

originated between June, 1940, and June, 1941. He added, quite Unnecessarily, that extermination

was never part of the original National Socialist plans for dealing with the Jews. He claimed

—  20  —

———————– Page 21———————–

that the decision of extermination was made when it became evident that Germany was involved

in a long war of doubtful outcome. His assumption is that Hitler was determined to avenge the

slaughter of Germans with a massacre of Jews. The same writer claimed, however, that Hitler

abandoned the extermination program in October 1944, for fear of retribution in case Germany lost

the war.

Poliakov noted that Eichmann was busy with the Madagascar project for Jewish settlement

abroad throughout 1941, but the German Foreign Office was informed in February 1942,that this

plan had been abandoned at least temporarily. Poliakov argued that the Germans were

necessarily thinking of extermination when they shelved their overseas emigration plan. He

recognized as a corollary that he also must show that they were not pursuing a plan for the

settlement of the Jews in Eastern Europe instead of overseas.

According to Poliakov, there were three clear stages of a general extermination policy. Phase one,

beginning in June, 1941, and directed exclusively against Soviet Jews, has been dealt with. Phase

two, beginning in March, 1942, constituted the first actions to bring together many of the Jews of

German-occupied Europe and place them either in Poland or in concentration camps. Phase three,

beginning in October 1942, was the action to concentrate most Jews, including those of Poland, in

camps. The final phase of general internment is supposed to imply the permanent denial of a

Jewish haven either in Eastern Europe or overseas.

Poliakov represented the liquidation of Jews in concentration camps as proceeding throughout

phase two as well as three. He accepted the previously cited statement of Dieter Wisliceny from

the documentary collection to the effect that the plan to exterminate European Jewry was

abandoned by Himmler in October 1944. Poliakov claimed that Göring was involved in the

extermination program, although Charles Bewley, Hermann Göring (Göttingen, 1956) has

pointed out that no evidence was found at Nuremberg to substantiate this charge.

13. The Mythical Conference of Jan. 20, 1942

While Soviet Jews were allegedly being shot at random wherever they could be found-a charge

which has been exposed as untrue-an important conference is supposed to have taken place in

Berlin, Am Grossen Wanssee Nr. 5658, on January 20, 1942. Reinhard Heydrich allegedly

presided -at this conference and is alleged to have said that he was commissioned by Göring to

discuss plans for eliminating the Jews of Europe (Das Dritten Reich und die Juden, pp. 120ff.).

Hans Frank is given credit for having provided information about this conference for the

prosecution, but he makes no mention of this in his memoirs, Im Angesicht des Galgens (In the

Shadow of the Gallows, Munich, 1953). Furthermore, it is a painful fact that Frank was never

given the opportunity to explain or confirm each and every excerpt allegedly taken from his

forty-two volume personal file as Governor-General in Poland. No-one has ever been found to

substantiate the alleged information about this conference, although Interior State-Secretary

Wilhelm Stuckart, who has wrongly been given credit as “the principal author of the 1935

Nuremberg laws (Adenauer’s aide Hans Globke was the actual author), and Under-State-

Secretary Hans Luther of the German Foreign Office were listed as present.

Heydrich supposedly said that emigration of Jews from Europe was futile because not more than

537,000 had departed since 1933. This ridiculously low figure, is Contradicted at every turn by

official German statistics. The figure of 537,000 would scarcely exceed the emigration of Jews from

Poland alone, during the period. Heydrich is also supposed to have, said that there were eleven

million Jews in Europe, and that 95 per cent of those were in the German area of occupation.

Actually, more than one-half of the European Jews are indicated in the same statement as being

in the 1941 territory of the USSR and more than one million are listed for Vichy France and

England. The absurdity of those figures is obvious. Yet the alleged protocol indicates that they

were accepted without contradiction by the learned and well-informed gentlemen at the

conference.

The next step in Heydrich’s supposed plan for the elimination of the Jews would be to concentrate

them in key areas, and hence this alleged conference of January 1942, is regarded as a signal for

the second phase in the liquidation of the Jews. Shortly afterward, the Germans proceeded to

move some of the Warsaw Jews into the Lublin area, and 310,322 of them had been sent out by the

—  21  —

———————– Page 22———————–

end of the summer of 1942. The first deportations of any Jews from Germany are specified by

Poliakov for October, 1941, and these proceeded the more general action in the occupied countries.

Sven Hedin, Ohne Auftrag in Berlin (In Berlin without Assignment, Buenos Aires, 1949, pp.

141ff.) discussed the sending of 1200 Jews from Stettin with Heinrich Himmler as early as March,

1940. Hedin was in Germany from Sweden in connection with a private effort to secure German

mediation in the Russo-Finnish war of 1939-1940. He was in possession of a Swedish journalist’s

report asserting that brutal conditions had prevailed among the Jews from Stettin, but Himmler

denied this and he declared that only one old woman had died on the trip. This would mark an

obvious exception to Poliakov’s assumption that no Jews from Germany were being transported

before October 1941.

14. The Role of Rudolf Höss in the Administration of Wartime Concentration Camps, and the

Nature of the Höss Memoirs

The concept of the death camp as a means of liquidating Jews returns us to Auschwitz. Poliakov’s

Harvest of Hate placed great stress on Polish lanquage memoirs, Wspomnienia, by Rudolf Höss,

which were later published in English as Commandant of Auschwitz (Cleveland, 1960). Höss was

the commander of what is supposed to have been the greatest death camp in world history.

The fact that these memoirs were published under Communist auspices makes it utterly

impossible to, accept their authenticity without decisive reservations. Furthermore, the

statements made by Höss both to British security officers at Flensburg under third-degree

conditions and under torture at Nuremberg makes it very difficult to believe that anything

attributed to Höss after his capture in 1946 bears much relation to actual facts. Even Gerald

Reitlinger, who grasps at every straw to document the extermination program, rejects the

Nuremberg trial testimony of Höss as hopelessly untrustworthy.

The purpose in examining the Höss material here is to decide to what extent, if any, a plausible

narrative has been presented under Communist auspices. The atrocity photographs in the

English-language edition are “supposed” to have been taken, by an “unknown SS man” who

received “special permission.” They were allegedly found by a Jewish woman in the Sudetenland

and sold to the Jewish museum in Prague. There is nothing whatever about these photographs to

render plausible their authenticity. They are undoubtedly akin to the pictures of the piles of

corpses alleged to have been civilians slain by the Germans during their eastern campaigns during

the First World War but were later proved to be Jews and others killed in pogroms carried out by

the Russians under the Tsar, years before 1914.

The introduction to the American edition of Höss’s memoirs was written by the Germanophobe

Lord (Edward F.) Russell of Liverpool. He is the author of The Scourge of the Swastika (N.Y.,

1954) which contains a brief survey of the atrocity evidence presented at Nuremberg. The survey

ends with obsolete claims about Dachau as a death camp. These claims about Dachau had been

repudiated and disproved years before, by Cardinal Faulliaber of Munich.

Russell, after mentioning the fact, in introducing Höss, that there were very few camps and

prisoners in Germany at the outbreak of World War II, claimed that not less than five million

Jews died in German concentration camps during the war. He discussed other estimates, and, after

satisfying himself that he was between those who claim six million and those who claim four

million, concluded: “The real number, however, will never be known”. One can only add that he

had no right to claim “not less than five million”. One might have expected that there would be

more interest than there apparently has been in persuading, even at this late date, such countries

as the United States, Great Britain, the USSR, and the Communist satellites to count and report

their Jewish populations.

The site at Auschwitz was allegedly selected for a concentration camp in 1940, in addition to the

availability of good transportation facilities, because it was a fearfully

unhealthy place. This is totally untrue. The Neue Brockhaus for 1938 indicated a population of

12,000 in the town of Auschwitz including 3,000 Jews. Although the place was not a popular

health resort, it did enjoy a reputation for a healthy and bracing Upper Silesian climate.

Höss began the story of his life in convincing fashion with his account of a happy boyhood in the

German Rhineland. His first disturbing experience was a violation of confessional by a Catholic

—  22  —

———————– Page 23———————–

priest who informed on him to his father for a minor dereliction. Höss succeeded in joining the

German army at an early age in 1916. He was sent to Turkey and served at the fronts in Iraq and

1?alestine. At the age of seventeen he was an NCO with extensive combat experience and the iron

cross. He had his first love affair with a German nurse at the Wilhelma hospital in Palestine.

The end of the war found him in Damascus. Three months of independent traveling at the head of

a group of comrades brought him home and thus enabled him to escape the fate of internment.

Höss was unable to adjust to the post-war life at home with his relatives, and he joined the

Rossbach Freikorps for service in the East. Höss was arrested on June 28, 1923, for participating in

the murder of a Communist spy. He was sentenced to ten year’s in prison on March 15, 1924, and

was amnestied on July 14, 1928. Although he had a brief period of mental breakdown while in

solitary confinement, Höss emerged with the record of a model prisoner.

Höss spent ten exciting days in Berlin with friends after his release before turning to farming. He

believed that National Socialism would best serve the interests of Germany, and he had become

Party Member no. 3240 at Munich as early as November, 1922. He joined the Artamanen farming

fraternity, to which Himmler also belonged, in 1928. He married in 1929 and was persuaded by

Himmler to join the SS. In 1934 he agreed to serve at the Dachau concentration camp.

At first, Höss was bewildered by the philosophy of hostile reserve toward the prisoners at

Dachau, which was indoctrinated into the SS guards by a local commandant, later replaced. Höss

himself had been a prisoner, and be tended to see all questions from the inmate’s viewpoint.

Nevertheless, he believed that the concentration camps were a necessary transitional phase in

the consolidation of National Socialism, and he was greatly attracted to the black SS uniform as

a symbol of quality and prestige. After a few years he was transferred to Sachsenhausen, where

the atmosphere, was more favorable.

The outbreak of war in 1939 brought a new phase of experience to the SS men on concentration

camp service. The enemies of Germany had sworn to annihilate the National Socialist Reich. It

was a question of existence, and not merely of the fate of a few provinces. The SS were supposed to

hold the ramparts of order until the return of peace and the formulation of a new code of laws. A

high-ranking SS officer, whose laxity had made possible the escape of an important Communist

prisoner, was executed by his comrades on direct orders from Himmler. This brought home the

seriousness of the situation to all of the SS men at Sachsenhausen. Some of the prisoners were

amnestied in 1939 when they agreed to serve in the German armed forces.

An untoward incident occurred in 1939 when some Cracow University professors were brought to

Sachsenhausen, but they were released a few weeks later through intervention by Göring. Höss

had extensive contacts at Sachsenhausen with Pastor Martin Niemoeller, a much-respected

opponent of National Socialism.

Höss went to Auschwitz with high hopes early in 1940. There was no camp there as yet, but he

hoped to organize a useful one which would make an important contribution to the German

industrial war effort. He had always been idealistic and sensitive about prison conditions, and

he hoped to establish housing and supply conditions for the prospective inmates which would be

as normal as possible for wartime. Höss ran into all the irritating obstacles of red tape and

shortage of supplies in his early work of organizing the camp, and he bitterly criticized the

inadequate qualifications of many of his colleagues.

Polish prisoners constituted the largest single group in the camp during the first two years,

although many inmates were also brought to Auschwitz from Germany. Russian contingents began

to arrive late in 1941 in poor condition after long marches. From mid-1942 the Jews constituted the

main element in the camp. Höss recalled that the small groups of Jews at Dachau had done very

well with their canteen privileges in the early days of the system. There had been virtually no

Jews at Sachsenhausen.

It is at this very point that the hitherto highly plausible Höss narrative becomes highly

questionable. The manner in which the alleged deliberate extermination of the Jews is described

is most astonishing. A special large detachment of Jewish prisoners was allegedly formed. These

men and women were to take charge of the contingents, either newly arrived or from within the

camp area, who had been selected for destruction. The role of the SS was to be limited to the most

—  23  —

———————– Page 24———————–

general supervision and to the release of the Zyklon-B gas pellets through the shower fixtures of

the supposed extermination sheds.

The actual taking of the clothes and the leading of the Jews into the pre-extermination sheds was

to be done by this special group of Jews. Later they were to dispose of the bodies. If the “doomed”

Jews resisted, they were beaten or forced to comply in other ways by the “privileged” Jews.

Allegedly, the latter did their work so thoroughly that it was never necessary for the SS guards

to intervene. Hence most of the SS personnel at the camp could be left in complete ignorance of the

extermination action. Of course, no Jew would ever be found to claim to be a member of this

infamous “special detachment.” Höss was released from his post at Auschwitz at the end of 1943,

and he became a chief inspector of the entire concentration camp system. He supposedly concealed

his earlier activities from his SS colleagues.

It should be pointed out that no Auschwitz inmate has ever personally claimed to have witnessed

the actual operation of these so-called “gas chambers.” The explanation has been that those who

were victims did not survive, and those who were accomplices had good motives not to admit

anything.

The Communist editors of the Höss memoirs obviously did everything in their power to make the

account plausible. Much effort was made to show that the individual in the SS counted for

nothing, orders for everything. The evident timidity of Höss in voicing his criticism of the

hostile rather than friendly attitude of the SS leadership toward the Dachau prisoners in the

early years was exploited to lend credence to the supposition that be would have been willing to

accept any excesses, including the massacre of huge numbers, even millions, of captive Jews. The

same account depicts Höss as a highly sensitive and gifted man living a normal family life with

his wife and children throughout his period at Auschwitz.

Höss is supposed to have said that the Jehovah’s Witnesses at Auschwitz favored death for all

Jews because Jews were the enemies of Christ. This was a staggering slip on the part of the

Communist editors. It must be remembered that a bitter struggle against the Jehovah’s Witnesses

is waged today by the Communists throughout all Satellite countries, and especially in the

Soviet zone of Germany. One cannot escape the conclusion that this special defamation of the

Jehovah’s Witnesses was introduced by the Communist editors.

It is, hence, impossible to avoid the conclusion that these so-called memoirs of Höss have been

subjected to an editorial supervision by Communists and others sufficiently extensive to destroy

their validity as an historical document. They have no more validity than the alleged Memoirs

of Eichmann. The claim that there is a hand-written original of these supervised memoirs can

scarcely be regarded as relevant. The Communists are notoriously successful in obtaining

“confessions,” and they possessed an amplitude of techniques which could be used to persuade

Höss to copy whatever was placed before him. The evidence of hand-writing in this case is no

more convincing than the famous after-the-event gas chamber film of Joseph Zigman, “The Mill

of Dealth,” used at the Nuremberg Trial. The so-called Höss memoirs end with the irrelevant

statement that the Nuremberg documents had convinced the defendant that Germany was

exclusively to blame for World War II.

It is important to note that Hermann Göring, who was exposed to the full brunt of the Nuremberg

atrocity propaganda, failed to be convinced by it. Hans Fritzsche, The Sword in the Scales

(London, 1953, p. 145) related that Göring, even after hearing the early Ohlendorf testimony on

the Einsatzgruppen and the Höss testimony on Auschwitz, remained firmly convinced that the

mass extermination of Jews by firing squad and gas chamber was entirely propaganda fiction.

Fritzsche pondered this question, and he concluded that there had certainly been no thorough

investigation of these monstrous charges. Fritzsche, who was acquitted at the trial, was a skilled

propagandist. He recognized that the alleged massacre of the Jews was the main point in the

indictment against all defendants. Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the SID (SS Security Service) chief, was

on trial as main defendant for the SS because of the suicide of Himmler, just as Fritzsche was

representing Goebbels for the same reason. Kaltenbrunner was no more convinced of the genocide

charges than was Göring, and he confided to Fritzsche that the prosecution was scoring apparent

successes because of their effective technique in coercing the witnesses and suppressing evidence. It

—  24  —

———————– Page 25———————–

was easier to seize a German and force him to make an incriminating confession by unmentionable

tortures than to investigate the circumstances of an actual case.

15. The Actual Character of the SS and their Role in the Genocide Mirage

The Communist-edited Höss memoirs raise the basic question of the nature of the SS and its

personnel. This is of decisive importance because of the dominant role of the SS in the

administration of the concentration camps. Books denouncing the SS since 1945 are legion, but

undoubtedly the two most comprehensive attacks are the narrative account by Gerald Reitlinger,

The SS: Alibi of a Nation (London, 1956), and the documentary collection by Reimund Schnabel,

Macht ohne Moral: eine Dokumentation über die SS (Power without Morality: a Documentation of

the SS, Frankfurt a.M., 1957). Both Schnabel and Reitlinger trace the growth of the SS

organization from its early birth within the National Socialist Party. Even in 1929, when

Himmler was placed in command, there were, only 280 members.

The SS was designed to be the most loyal and single-minded security organization protecting the

Hitler movement. Schnabel cited Himmler as saying at Goslar in 1935 that not many in Germany

would like the SS and that some would become actually sick when they saw the SS uniform.

Reitlinger placed special emphasis on major dramatic events such as the uprising of the Warsaw

ghetto in April, 1943, and its suppression the following month by the SS and Polish auxiliary

units. Both men seek to present the SS leadership as made up of dull, pedantic men without

scruples, and the mass of the SS men as over-trained robots with an infinite capacity to

rationalize deeds of horror.

There is, of course, another side to the SS story which it is necessary to consider in order to obtain

the full picture. The SS troops resented the charge that they had been transformed and

dehumanized. They were particularly indignant at the charge directed against them after the

war that they had been criminal members of a criminal organization. Thousands of affidavits by

former SS men testifying to the morality and worth of their organization have been preserved in

the unpublished records of the Nuremberg trials.

The SS men were quick to point out that their social status and educational background were

above average. They recalled that no criminal elements or men with criminal records were

allowed in the organization. They considered themselves primarily loyal servants of the state

and of peace and order rather than fanatical ideologues.

More than 5/6th of the SS membership had not been connected with the National Socialist Party

prior to 1933. Only 20 per cent of the SS who served in all capacities during the war had

volunteered for service prior to the outbreak of war. A decided majority of SS members

participated actively in either the Catholic or Evangelical churches.

The SS men argued that their indoctrination on the Jewish question was customarily

sophisticated and at a high level and it was most certainly not calculated either to instill

hatred or a desire to exterminate the Jews. Indeed, the SS men considered it part of their office to

protect Jews and their property as they had done in putting an end to the anti-Jewish

demonstrations in German cities in November 1938. Some 99 per cent of the SS men declared that

they had first heard rumors of the alleged atrocities against the Jews after the war was over,

and they had no idea of so-called planned war crimes.

It was part of their teaching that brutality was considered unworthy of an SS man. All of them

knew of atrocities against the Germans in Russia and Yugoslavia during the war, and of serious

American mistreatment of the SS captives at the gigantic Fürstenfeldbruck camp after May, 1945.

It was the understanding of the SS that foreign workers in the Reich during the war were on an

equal status with German workers, and that undue pressure was not to be exerted to increase the

production of the work detachments formed by concentration camp inmates. It was widely known

in this branch of the service that two SS men had been dishonorably discharged for entering a

Jewish domicile in Hannover in 1936 without permission. It was also known that two SS men were

expelled at Düsseldorf in 1937 for mistreating a Jew.

The former SS men objected to the charge that all those connected with concentration camp

administration were sadists. Men from such camps as Dachau, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen, and

Auschwitz insisted that the prisoners at the camps did not have abnormal work and appeared

—  25  —

———————– Page 26———————–

well-fed. The camps during most of the war were generally clean and well-organized; it was only

in the last fearful months that the lack of food and the worst over-crowding took place. The

actual camp guards were conscripted for their work. It was easy to obtain affidavits after 1945

from thousands of former concentration camp inmates who had received good treatment.

SS Judge Dr. Konrad Morgen, as chief investigator of the Reich Criminal Police Office, visited

numerous camps in 1943 and 1944, including Auschwitz. He discussed confidentially with

hundreds of inmates the prevailing situations. The working inmates received a daily ration even

throughout 1943 and 1944 of not less than 2750 calories, which was more than double the average

civilian ration throughout occupied Germany during the years immediately after 1945.

The regular diet thus described was frequently supplemented both on outside work and in the

camps. Morgen saw only a few undernourished inmates in hospitals and here disease was a factor.

The pace and achievement in work by inmates was far lower than among the German civilian

workers. Premiums were used to increase production, and as a result the inmates often had more

tobacco than the outside population or even the guards. Recreational facilities for the prisoners

in the camps included radio, library, newspapers, movies and all sorts of sports.

SS court actions were conducted in the camps during the war to prevent excesses, and more than 800

major cases were investigated prior to 1945. Morgen made a statement at Nuremberg on July 13,

1946, which was based on reports he had heard since the war, to the effect that a secret

extermination campaign might have been in progress without his knowledge, but later he

retracted this statement.

The administration of the German concentration camps was the focal point in the trial of Oswald

Pohl at Nuremberg in 1948. Pohl was the chief disbursing officer of the German navy until 1934,

when he transferred to service in the SS at the insistence of Himmler. During eleven years he was

the principal administrative chief of the entire SS and it was his responsibility after 1941 to see

that the concentration camps became major industrial producers. Yet all the testimony permitted

Pohl at his trial is confined to seven pages in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg

Military Tribunals, 1946-1949, vol. 5, pp. 555ff.

A peak point of irony was reached at the trial when the prosecution said to Pohl that “had

Germany rested content with the exclusion of Jews from her own territory, with denying them

German citizenship, with excluding them from public office, or any like domestic regulation, no

other nation could have been heard to complain.” The fact is that Germany was bombarded with

protests and economic reprisals, and especially from the United States, for the treatment of the

Jews precisely along these lines in the years prior to 1941. The prosecution tried very hard to

prove that Pohl had seen some gas chambers at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944, but Pohl

repudiated this charge, at every opportunity. It is a fact that Pohl had earlier signed some

incriminating statements after being subjected to severe torture. Konrad Morgen presented a

special affidavit denying that he had ever intended to implicate Pohl in any possible attempt to

exterminate Jews. But it was to no avail, and Pohl was sentenced and hanged. This dejected and

broken man was falsely depicted at his trial as having been a veritable fiend in human form

during his days of power.

The impression which Pohl made on other people during the days of his influence was decidedly

different. In December, 1942, Pohl explained to Heinrich Hoepker some of those medieval, anti-

personal property concepts of the SS which had been derived from the traditions of the German

Order of Knights. Marc Augier, Goetterdaemmerung (Twilight of the Gods, Freising, 1957) has

made clear that the SS did not have the slightest desire to extend these principles to private

German society.

Hoepker was an anti-Nazi friend of Pohl’s new wife. Pohl, previously a widower, had remarried

in 1942. Hoepker was a leading mason of the Grand Lodge of Royal York, and, until 1934, he had

been the vice-president of the Prussian Statistical State Office. He came into contact with Pohl

repeatedly during the period 1942-1945. Pohl’s conversation with Hoepker in December, 1942,

marked Pohl’s first attempt to give a full exposition of the SS and its functions to a prominent

anti-Nazi figure. Hoepker noted that Pohl’s attitude on this occasion was characterized by

serenity and imperturbable optimism.

—  26  —

———————– Page 27———————–

Hoepker noted on all subsequent occasions that a cornradely and pleasant atmosphere prevailed

among Pohl and his SS colleagues. Hoepker, during a visit to Pohl in the spring of 1944, was

brought into contact with concentration camp inmates who were working on a special local project

outside their camp area. Hoepker noted that the prisoners worked in a leisurely manner and in a

relaxed atmosphere without any pressure from their guards.

Hoepker knew that Pohl did not entertain a highly emotional attitude on the Jewish question,

and he knew that the Inspector did not object in the slightest when the Jewess Annemarie Jaques

who was a close friend of Pohl’s wife, visited at the Pohl home. Hoepker was fully convinced by

the beginning of 1945, after several years of intimate and frequent contact with Pohl, that the

chief administrator of the German concentration camp system was a humane, conscientious, and

dedicated servant of his task. Hoepker was thoroughly astonished when he learned later in 1945

of the Allied accusations against Pohl and his colleagues. Hoepker concluded that the Inspector

was either completely psychotic (schizophenic), or else knew nothing of the excesses with which

he was charged.

Mrs. Pohl noted that her husband retained his imperturbable serenity in the face of adversity

until his March, 1945, visit to the concentration camp, at Bergen-Belsen. He encountered this

camp, which had been a model of order and cleanliness, in a state of chaos during a sudden typhus

epidemic which was raging there. The situation was frightful, and Pohl was able to do very

little under the desperate circumstances which the war had reached by that time. The visit of

Pohl took place at about the time that Anne Frank was reported to have died there. Pohl

eventually returned to his wife as a broken man, and he never recovered his former state of

composure.

Dr. Alfred Seidl, who played a prominent role throughout the Nuremberg trials and whose gifts

as defense attorney were highly respected by Allied prosecutors, defended Pohl at his trial.

Seidl went to work on behalf of Pohl with the passion of a Zola seeking to exonerate Dreyfus.

This was understandable, because Seidl had been a personal acquaintance of Pohl for many years,

and he was thoroughly convinced of his innocence with respect to the charge of planned

participation in any action of genocide directed against the Jewish people. The Allied judgment

which condemned Pohl did not prompt Seidl to change his opinion in the slightest. He realized

that the Allied prosecutors had failed to produce a solitary piece of valid evidence against Pohl.

The role of Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich in exonerating the Dachau concentration camp,

leadership from the charge of practicing genocide against the Jewish people is well known. The

Communist-edited Höss memoirs correctly suggest that conditions of discipline were more severe

at Dachau in 1933 and 1934 than at Sachsenhausen or Flossenbürg. This was largely due to

personnel factors at Dachau which were later modified. Hundreds of affidavits testify to the

fact that conditions at Dachau in wartime were orderly and generally humane. For instance, the

Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, was at Dachau from May 22, 1940 to April 29, 1945,

nearly the whole war period. He testified on March 21, 1946 that the prisoners at Dachau during

his stay received good treatment, and he added that the SS personnel at the camp were “well

disciplined.”

Berta Schirotschin, who worked in the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that

the Dachau work details, until the beginning of 1945, and despite the increasing privations in

Germany, received their customary second breakfast at 10:00 -a.m. every morning. It would take

an impossible stretch of the imagination to contemplate any such consideration for German

prisoners of war in Allied detention camps both during and after the war.

The German camp personnel in the various camp locations remained surprisingly complacent and

lenient in the face of the notoriously poor work performance of concentration camp inmates. A

typical exposition of this situation was made on August 13, 1947, by Richard Goebel, an official of

the Portland Cement Corporation. Goebel was in contact with Auschwitz inmates and their work

details throughout 1943 and 1944. He cited one instance of a project in a quarry with 300 free

German workers and 900 Auschwitz inmates. All of the more difficult jobs were done by the free

Germans, and at no time were the inmates required to work more than a normal eight-hour shift.

Goebel had previously conducted the same project with 350 free workers, and he noted that he

was unable to obtain a higher rate of production with his new combined labor force of 1200. In

—  27  —

———————– Page 28———————–

other words, the work of 900 inmates was equivalent to that of 50 free German workers. Goebel

never once encountered mistreatment of Auschwitz prisoners, and be noted that the inmates who

worked well received ample premium certificates for supplementary food supplies and tobacco.

The laxity of the work performance of inmates, attested to by hundreds of affidavits from

Auschwitz and the other concentration camps, did not, as might have been expected,

automatically provoke harsh treatment or reprisals. This laxity was taken for granted as a

permanent factor by the administration camp personnel. The slow down tactics on work details

were especially notorious at Dachau, but the veteran Communist leader, Ernst Ruff, testified in

an affidavit of April 18, 1947, that the treatment of prisoners in the camp and on the work

details remained humane.

The pathetic astonishment of SS personnel at the accusations leveled against their organization

is reflected in the affidavit of SS Major-General Heinz Fanslau, who had visited most of the

German concentration camps during the last years of the war. Fanslau had taken an intense

interest in concentration camp conditions, quite apart from his military duties at the front, and he

was selected by the Allies as a prime target in the allegation of a conspiracy to annihilate the

Jewish people. It was argued that Fanslau, with his many contacts, must have been fully

informed. When it was first rumored that Fanslau would be tried and convicted, there were

hundreds of affidavits produced on his behalf from Jews and Jehovah’s Witnesses who had been

inmates at the camps which he had visited. When he read the full scope of the indictment

against the concentration camp personnel in supplementary Nuremberg trial no 4, Fanslau

exclaimed in despair on May 6, 1947: “This cannot be possible, because I, too, would have had to

know something about it.”

Hermann Pister, the ex-Buchenwald commander, was tortured into signing a statement at

Nuremberg that concentration camp prisoners who, refused to work were shot. But the Allied

prosecution failed to reckon with the tough perseverance and stamina of Gerhard Maurer, who

had been in charge of all camp labor at Buchenwald. Maurer never cracked, and, in a

comprehensive affidavit from Nuremberg on July 11, 1947, he analyzed horoughly the situation

which existed. He proved that the fictitious order to shoot prisoners refusing to work was

contrary to the practice which prevailed, and that such an order was never actually issued.

SS Lieutenant-Colonel Kurt Schmidt-Klevenow, who was a legal officer with the economy and

administration office of the concentration camp system, was especially eloquent on August 8, 1947,

in arguing that Pohl had always been a conscientious and responsible official. It is small wonder

that neither his testimony nor the sample affidavits cited above have ever been printed, because

they present a picture quite different from that which the Nuremberg prosecution wished to, give

to the world. Indeed, it is to be hoped that some day Nuremberg documents will be published

which have been carefully and fairly selected by objective editors. All of the, existing published

series of Nuremberg documents are positively farcial in their one-sidedness.

Schmidt-Klevenow pointed out that Pohl, beginning with the successfully conducted Saubersweig

case in 1940, had given judge Konrad Morgen full support in his judicial investigations of

irregularities at various camps. Indeed, Pohl actually took a far more energetic role in the

difficult Lakebusch case that did Morgen himself. In the notorious Morgen trial prosecution of

Commander Koch of Buchenwald, to which the German public was invited, both Pohl and

Schmidt were for the conviction and execution of Koch, whereas Morgen was content with the

indefinite adjournment of the trial and the retirement of Koch.

Schmidt explained in 1947 that Pohl was instrumental in arranging for local district police chiefs

to share with the SS in important jurisdictional functions of the concentration camp system. Pohl

on numerous occasions took personal initiative in insisting on strict discipline over camp personnel,

and it was due to his efforts in the Ramdohr case that a Gestapo man who had beaten a woman at

Ravensbrueek was prosecuted and convicted.

A typical prosecution affidavit contested by the defense in the concentration camp trial was that

of Alois Hoellriegel, who had been instrumental in securing the conviction and execution of SS

leader Ernst Kaltenbrunner in 1946. Hoellriegel had claimed that mass gassing operation had

taken place at the Mauthausen camp in Austria, and that he, as member of the camp personnel,

had witnessed Kaltenbrunner taking part in these operations.

—  28  —

———————– Page 29———————–

It was impossible to sustain this statement signed by the tortured Hoellriegel at the time of the

Pohl trial in 1947. The defense proved that all deaths at Mauthausen were systematically

checked by the regular local police authorities. In addition, hundreds of affidavits from former

Jewish inmates at Mauthausen were collected which testified to humane and orderly conditions

at the camp and to good treatment for the prisoners.

The effective work of the defense attorneys, which received no recognition in the official

Nuremberg documents, was, nevertheless, confirmed by many prominent American officials who

investigated the problem. A typical example of this is reflected in the comments of Stephen F.

Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the War Department of the United States in the occupation

forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war. He made the following statement in

the most widely read American Catholic magazine, Our Sunday Visitor, for June 14, 1959:

I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state

that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and

erroneously described as a gas chamber was a crematory. Nor was there a gas chamber in any of

the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at

Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to

investigate since the Russians would not permit it. From what I was able to determine during six

postwar years in Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a

million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of

concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on

this subject.

It is small wonder under such considerations that the Holy See has steadfastly and consistently

refused to join those who charge that Germany practiced a deliberate policy of seeking to

exterminate the Jewish population of Europe. It was possible after Pinter departed from Germany

for Americans to visit Auschwitz, but in the meantime many years had elapsed and there had

been ample opportunity for the Communist authorities in Poland to set the stage for such visits.

16. Polish Jewry and the Extermination Legend

Frank Gibney, in his The Frozen Revolution: Poland, a Study in Communist Decay (N.Y., 1959),

offered a graphic description of the new Communist shrine at Auschwitz. He described “the pond

at Oswiecim (Auschwitz)” some fifteen miles south-east of the former German industrial city of

Kattowitz. Gibney rightly noted that the pond contains tons of bones and ashes, but he was

uncritical when assuming, as he did, that these were dumped there in the period “1940-1945.” He

dealt with Polish and Jewish situations since the 1930’s in his book, and he devoted much space

to the anti-Jewish race riot at Brest-Litovsk in 1938, in which, unlike the anti-Jewish measures in

Germany in November, 1938, some Jews were actually killed. But his book does not contain a

single word about the Russians as the actual perpetrators of the mass massacre of the Polish

intelligentsia and officers at the Katyn Forest in 1940. Some of the bones in the Auschwitz basin

might have been those of the 10,000 other Poles massacred by the Russians who have never yet

been accounted for.

Gibney claimed, on the basis of doubtful evidence, that Khrushchev in October, 1956, deplored

the prominent role of the Jews in post-war Communist Poland. Khrushchev is alleged to have

said that there were “too many Abramovitches in your Polish Party” (Ibid., p. 194). Gibney in

this instance was clearly partaking of the fantastic scheme promoted in America in recent years

to make the USSR appear anti-Jewish. The assured position of the Jews in the USSR, and the

absence of any and all anti-Jewish measures there cannot fail to render such efforts ludicrous.

John K. Galbraith, in his Journey to Poland and Yugoslavia (Harvard University Press, 1958), is

similar to Gibney in his general approach, although he is also somewhat more enthusiastic about

the Gemulka regime in Poland. Galbraith discusses the impact of the German concentration camp

system on Poland (Ibid., pp. 62ff.), but he avoids sweeping statements about the fate of Polish

Jewry. Much more detailed information on the prominent role of Jews in present-day Poland is

contained in Clifford R. Barnett, Poland: its People, its Society, its Culture (New Haven, 1958).

Barnett was carefully vague about the alleged number of Jews in contemporary Poland because of

the suppression by the Communists of all statistics on Jews. He did emphasize the conspicuous and

—  29  —

———————– Page 30———————–

omnipresent role of Jewish culture in Poland through the Jewish state theatres, Jewish books and

radio programs, and the exceedingly numerous Jewish cultural associations.

Thad Paul Alton, Polish Postwar Economy (N.Y., 1955, p. 106) was less cautious about Polish

Jewry, and he accepted a figure from Eugene Kulischer, “Population Changes behind the Iron

Curtain” in Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Sept. 1950, who

made the preposterous statement that there were only 80,000 Jews in Poland by 1949. The pure

guess-work which has characterized the glib generalizations of Kulischer on European

populations has been recognized to be a highly untrustworthy source for serious scholars.

The playing with figures under the cloak of Communist censorship has been notorious in the case

of Polish Jewry. The Jewish joint Distribution Committee, which was permitted by the Germans

to maintain offices in Poland until

Pearl Harbor, claimed in figures prepared for the Nuremberg Military Tribunal late in 1945 that

the total remaining Jewish population in Poland had been reduced to 80,000. Yet, even Communist

masters of Poland were unable to prevent a major pogrom against the Jews at Kielce on July 4, 1946,

and within a short time more than 120,000 Polish Jews had fled from the central sector of Poland

into Western Germany. Subsequently, the estimate of the number of Jews who had been in Poland

at the end of 1945 underwent considerable revision until it was placed even by the American

Jewish Year Book, 1948-1949, at 390,000 instead of the earlier figure of 80,000.

The complete absence of reliable statistics has not hindered such writers as Jacob Lestschinsky,

The Position of the Jewish People Today (N.Y., 1952, pp. 4ff.) and Jacques Vernant, The Refugee

in the Post-War World (London, 1953, pp. 448ff.) from playing fast and loose with the facts in

estimating the numbers of Jews in such countries as Poland, Rumania, and the USSR. H.B.M.

Murphy, et al., Flight and Resettlement (UNESCO, Lucerne, 1955, pp. 159ff.) show considerable

surprise that Jews in D.P. camps have revealed far less mental derangement and emotional

instability than other refugee groups. The authors find this astonishing because the Jews are

proverbially considered to be the chief victims of World War II. Nevertheless, reflection should

indicate that many Jewish D.P.’s had far less devastating wartime experiences than other

refugee groups, and, unlike the other refugee groups, who were hopelessly ruined, they emerged

from the war as a dominant and triumphant minority.

The central position of Polish Jewry in the great wartime drama was underlined in April, 1943, by

the sensational uprising of the Warsaw ghetto against the German authorities, who were

planning to evacuate all Jews of that district and send them to the Lublin area. As a matter of

fact, most of the Jews had been moved there against considerable opposition before the last-ditch

stand began. Jews had fled to Warsaw from many towns in Poland in 1939, and at one time the

ghetto contained no less than 400,000 persons. Warsaw was the scene of huge black market

operations and a lively trade in currency and contraband goods, including hundreds of German

army uniforms which were sold to the Polish underground. The evacuation of the Jews to-the East

began on July 22, 1942, and by January, 1943, no less than 316,822 had been transported.

A graphic account of the ghetto battle from April 20, 1943 to its finish on May 16, 1943 is

contained in the Stroop, memorandum (Trial of the Major War Criminals, 1945-1946, vol. 26, pp.

628ff.). The Germans accepted a fight to the finish in their effort, with their Polish cohorts, to

complete the evacuation of the ghetto by force. The stubborn defense cost the loss of many lives in

burning buildings. The German and Polish attackers lost 101 men killed and wounded, whereas

the estimated total Jewish casualties were no less than 16,000. About 55,000 Jews were captured

and sent to the Lublin area. The details of these events up to the transportation to Lublin were

presented in fiction form by John Hersey, The Wall (N.Y., 1951).

More recently, in 1958, Notes from the Warsaw Ghetto: the Journal of Emanuel Ringelblum, was

published by McGraw-Hill in New York. Ringelblum had been an active leader in organizing

sabotage against the Germans in Poland, including the 1943 Warsaw uprising, prior to his arrest

and execution in 1944. The editors of the American edition of the Ringelblum journal admit that

they were denied access to the uncensored original journal at Warsaw or to the copy made of it

and sent to Israel. Instead, they have faithfully followed the expurgated volume published

under Communist auspices at Warsaw in 1952. This is exactly the same situation that prevailed

with the American edition of the so-called Höss memoirs.

—  30  —

———————– Page 31———————–

The Ringelblum account is, nevertheless, far more bitter than that of Hersey in denouncing the

Jewish Council leaders at Warsaw and the Jewish police who did most of the

work in arranging for the transportation of the Warsaw ghetto population to the Lublin area.

Indeed, the principal emphasis of the book is directed toward the need of Jewish unity in contrast

to the disunity which prevailed among the Polish Jews. This has remained the dominant theme

of Zionist leaders and it was clearly exemplified by the controversial speech of Israeli Premier

David Ben-Gurion on December 28, 1960, which attacked the alleged laxity and absence of true

Zionist zeal in wide circles of American Jewry. Israeli Zionism continues to demand the absolute

subordination to Israel of all Jews in the non-Communist world.

The Ringelblum journal, like the Hersey novel, refers in general terms, and by rumor only, to the

alleged plan of exterminating the Jews of Poland. It has been widely asserted that Polish Jewry

was destroyed in World War 11. Yet, quite apart from escape into Russia and emigration to Israel

and the West, both Polish exchange professors visiting the United States today and American

Poles returning from visits to Poland, agree with Barnett on the major Jewish role in contemporary

Poland. The unofficial estimates which they encountered among the Poles themselves were that

there are at least half a million Jews in Poland today and probably more than that figure. This

figure should be considered in connection with the action exodus of Jews from Poland after 1945

and our earlier estimate that the Jewish population of the German zone of occupation in 1939,

which closely approximated in the East the present eastern Polish boundary, could scarcely have

exceeded 1,100,000. Certainly enough is known to enable any impartial observer to regard the

alleged extermination of Polish Jewry as in part a myth built around the dramatic circumstances

of the uprising in the Warsaw ghetto during April and May of 1943.

17. The Exaggerations of Kurt Gerstein Discredit the Extermination Myth

One of the most curious incidents of testimony concerning the alleged deliberate extermination of

the Jews was provided by the memoranda of Kurt Gerstein. He was employed as a disinfection

expert by the SS from 1942 until his capture in April 1945. Gerstein joined the National Socialist

Party in 1933. He was expelled in 1936 for eccentric conduct which included distributing through

the mails 8,500 pamphlets criticizing National Socialism. During his later 1941 SS training in

Holland, he worked with the Dutch underground movement. He claimed to have provided gas for

execution purposes, and to have been a witness of mass gas executions on a grandiose scale on

numerous occasions.

In his personal conversations and answers, Gerstein contended that be knew that no less than forty

million concentration camp prisoners has been gassed. In his first signed memorandum on the

subject of April 26, 1945, he reduced the number to twenty-five million. He added that only four or

five other persons had seen what he had witnessed, and they were Nazis. Even this was rather

too extreme for his interrogators and he was induced to draw up a second memorandum at Rottweil

on May 4, 1945 which was in closer conformity to the legend of the alleged extermination of six

million Jewish victims.

It is interesting to note that Hans Rothfels, “Augenzeugenbericht zu den Massenvergasungen (Eye-

Witness Report of Mass Gassings)” in Vierteliahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, April, 1953, made a

special point of stating that Evangelical Bishop Wilhelm Dibelius of Berlin denounced the

Gerstein memoranda as “Untrustworthy.” Two years later, however, in 1955, the Bonn Federal

Center for Local Services issued an edition of the second Gerstein memorandum for distribution in

all German schools (Dokumentation zur Massen-Vergasung, Bonn, 1955). The editors in their

introduction stated that the Gerstein memoranda were valid “beyond any doubt,” and they add

that Dibelius has expressed his special confidence in Gerstein.

The second Gerstein memorandum is very emphatic in describing a visit by Hitler to a

concentration camp in Poland on June 6, 1942, which in point of fact never took place.

Unfortunately, the West German Government of Konrad Adenauer has actually discouraged the

exposure of this defamation of wartime Germany. It finds a vested interest of its own in

perpetuating wartime falsehoods. In this sense it is truly a puppet government and no genuine

German Government at all. The government of the Weimar Republic bad taken a leading part in

exposing the exaggerations and falsifications in the chargesof German atrocities in the first

—  31  —

———————– Page 32———————–

World War, such as those embodied in the famous Bryce Report and the writings of Arnold

Toynbee.

Gerstein was sent to Cherche Midi prison in Paris after his two “confessions.” He is reported to

have died on July 25, 1945. The manner of his death and the place of his grave are unknown. His

death is no less mysterious than the alleged suicide of Heinrich Himmler in British military

captivity. The work of the prosecution at Nuremberg would have been far more difficult had

Himmler been allowed to testify. It is quite likely that Gerstein, who was in good health when

sent to Paris, was considered to have outlived his usefulness before the Nuremberg trials

commenced.

18. Myths and Realities Concerning Auschwitz and other Death Camps

Höss “confessed” on various occasions that 2,500,000 to 3,000,000 people had been gassed at the

single camp of Auschwitz. It has always been claimed that most of these alleged victims were

Jews, and therefore this would account for nearly half of the supposed six million Jewish victims

in the period from 1941 to 1945. It is important to note that the alleged end of this supposed death

program in October, 1944, does not terminate the chronicle of Jewish victims who met death from

hunger, bombing, -and disease at the camps or in the camp evacuations during the last hectic

months of the war. Therefore, one is expected to believe that nearly two-thirds of the deaths in

the total alleged deliberate extermination program took place at one camp.

The destruction or hiding of German statistics about the details of Auschwitz by the supporters of

the extermination legend, and the refusal of the Russians to give out any accurate statistics in

regard to the Jews in Russia just before 1941 or after 1945 makes it impossible to state with

exactness just bow many Jews were ever interned at Auschwitz, but it is certain that the number of

Jews who got there during ,the war was only a smallest fraction of those alleged to have been

exterminated there. The Jewish statistician, Reitlinger, who is rather more careful with his

figures than most Jews who have reported on the subject, states in his The SS: the Alibi of a

Nation, pp. 268ff., that the total of all internees registered at Auschwitz from February, 1940, to

January, 1945, was only 363,000 and by no means all of these were Jews. Moreover, during the war

many of those originally sent to Auschwitz were released or transferred elsewhere, and at least

80,000 were evacuated westward in January, 1945. The wild, erratic and irresponsible nature of

the statements about the number of Jews exterminated at Auschwitz can be gleaned from the fact

that the figures which have been offered by the supporters of the extermination legend have run

from around 200,000 to, over six millions.

Benedikt Kautsky, Teufel und Verdammte (Devil and Damned, Zürich, 1946, p. 275) claimed that

“at least 3,500,000 persons were gassed at Auschwitz.” This was a remarkable statement from a

man, who by his own admission, never saw any gas chambers there (Ibid., pp. 272-3).

Kautsky explained that he was sent as a Jewish political prisoner from Buchenwald in October,

1942, to work at Auschwitz-Buna. The victims of liquidation were supposedly gassed more than a

mile distant at Auschwitz-Birkenau. Kautsky heard rumors to this effect.

Kautsky did witness several executions at Auschwitz. He cited a case in which two Polish

inmates were executed for killing two Jewish inmates. He dedicated his book to his mother who

died at eighty years of age on December 8, 1944. Like all Jews of whatever age who died during

this period in German-occupied territory, she is considered to be a victim of the Nazis. Kautsky

returned to Buchenwald in January, 1945, when Auschwitz was abandoned by Germany. He

described how the final months of Germany’s collapse in 1945 produced the worst conditions of

hunger and disease that Buchenwald, which is rarely claimed any longer as an extermination

camp, had ever seen. Kautsky stressed the fact that the use of inmates in war industry was a

major feature of German concentration camp policy to the very end. He failed to reconcile this

with the alleged attempt to massacre all Jews.

Paul Rassinier, Le Mensonge d’Ulysso (The Lies of Odysseus, Paris, 1955, pp. 209ff.) demonstrated

conclusively that there were no gas chambers at Buchenwald. Rassinier is a French professor who

spent most of the war as an inmate at Buchenwald. He made short work of the extravagant

claims about Buchenwald gas chambers in David Rousset, The Other Kingdom (N.Y., 1947;

French ed., L’Univers Concentrationnaire, Paris, 1946). He also investigated Denise Dufournier,

—  32  —

———————– Page 33———————–

Ravensbrueck: the Women’s Camp of Death (London, 1948), and he found that the heroine had no

other evidence for gas chambers than the vague rumors described by Margarete Buber. Similar

investigations were made of such books as Filip Friedman, This Was Oswiecim (Auschwitz): the

Story of a Murder Camp (N.Y., 1946), and Eugen Kogon, The Theory and Practice of Hell (N.Y.,

1950). Rassinier did mention Kogon’s claim that a deceased former inmate, Janda Weiss, had said

to Kogon alone that she had been a witness of the gas chambers in operation at Auschwitz.

Rassinier noted that there were of course rumors about gas chambers at Dachau too, but

fortunately they were merely rumors. Indeed, one could trace them as far back as the sensational

book by the German Communist, Hans Beimler, Four Weeks in the Hands of Hitler’s Hell-

Hounds: the Nazi Murder Camp of Dachau (N.Y., 1933).

Rassinier entitled his book The Lies of Odysseus in commemoration of the immemorial fact that

travelers return bearing tall tales. Rassinier asked Abbé Jean-Paul Renard, who had also been at

Buchenwald, how he could possibly have testified that gas chambers had been in operation

there. Renard replied that others had told him of their existence, and hence he had been willing

to pose as a witness of things that he had never seen (Ibid., pp. 209ff.).

Rassinier has toured Europe for years, like Diogenes seeking an honest man, more specifically

somebody who was an actual eyewitness, of any person, Jew or Gentile, who had ever been

deliberately exterminated in a gas oven by Germans during the course of World War II, but be has

never found even one such person. He found that not one of the authors of the many books charging

that the Germans had exterminated millions of Jews during the war had ever seen a gas oven

built for such purposes, much less seen one in operation, nor had one of these authors ever been able

to produce a live, authentic eyewitness who had done so. In an extensive lecture tour in the main

cities of West Germany in the spring of 1960, Professor Rassinier vigorously emphasized to his

German audiences that it was high time for a new spirit of inquiry and a rebirth of truth. He

suggested that it would be very fitting for the Germans to start work along this line with respect

to the extermination legend, which remains a main but wholly unjustified and unnecessary blot on

Germany in the eyes of the world.

Ernst Kaltenbrunner no doubt had the problem of truth in mind when be complained about the

success of the Nuremberg prosecution in coercing German witnesses to make extravagant

statements in support of the myth of the six million. Many of the key witnesses who did not have

since been executed, but not all of them. Willi Frischauer, Himmler: the Evil Genius of the Third

Reich (London, 1953, pp. 148ff.) makes much of the incriminating testimony of SS General Erich

von den Bach-Zelewski against Himmler at the main Nuremberg trial. Himmler was supposed to

have spoken to Bach-Zelewski in grandiose terms about the liquidation of people in Eastern

Europe, but Göring, in the Nuremberg courtroom, condemned Bach-Zelewski to his face for this

testimony.

Bach-Zelewski in April, 1959, publicly repudiated his Nuremberg testimony before a West

German court, and be admitted with great courage that his earlier statements, which had no

foundation in fact, had been made for reasons of expediency and survival. This was one of two

types of false German testimony at Nuremberg. The other was that of testimony by those Germans

opposed to the National Socialist regime who played fast and loose with the facts. Charles

Bewley, Herman Göring (Göttingen, 1956, pp. 296ff.) has done an admirable piece of work in

illustrating this in the case of the Gestapo official and member of the German underground, Hans

Bernd Gisevius. The testimony of Kurt Gerstein would also fall into this category.

19. The National Socialist Leaders and the Policy of Exterminating Jews

A vigorous and protracted controversy has arisen over which key figures in the German

leadership were supposed to have favored the mass extermination of European Jewry in the first

instance. First and foremost it is necessary to consider the case of Hitler and to analyze the

contention that Hitler was an active participant in a campaign to exterminate European Jewry.

Joachin von Ribbentrop, Zwischen London und Moskau (Between London and Moscow, Leoni, 1953,

pp. 274ff.) noted that Hitler was convinced World War II would not have occurred had it not been

for Jewish influence. Hitler regarded Germany’s struggle with Great Britain and the United

States as a disaster for western civilization and a triumph for Communism. He knew that

—  33  —

———————– Page 34———————–

President Roosevelt had worked with every available means to promote war in Europe prior to

the English declaration of war against Germany on September 3, 1939. He did not believe that

Chamberlain would have accepted war had it not been for the pressure from President Roosevelt.

Further, Hitler did not believe that President Roosevelt would have worked for war had be not

been encouraged and supported in his efforts by the powerful American-Jewish community.

Ribbentrop’s view of the situation was more penetrating, realistic, and accurate. He did not

believe that President Roosevelt would have been able to persuade Great Britain to move toward

war against Germany had it not been for the pursuance by Lord Halifax of the traditional British

imperialistic policy based on the balance of power. Ribbentrop reminded Hitler that Jewish

influence in England was still very slight during the long struggle against Napoleon, who had

adopted the traditional anti-Jewish position of Voltaire. The friendly position of Kaiser

Wilhelm II toward the Jews had no influence whatever in preventing the British onslaught

against Germany in 1914.

Ribbentrop engaged in repeated discussions with Hitler about the Jewish question during the war

and even during their last meeting on April 22, 1945. He was convinced that Hitler never

remotely contemplated the extermination of European Jewry.

The most comprehensive attempt to document the thesis that Hitler himself directed an effort to

exterminate European Jewry was made by the English Jew, Gerald Reitlinger. An expanded

German-language version of his major work appeared under the title Die Endlösung: Hitlers

Versuch der Austrottung der Juden Europas, 1939-1945 (The Final Solution: Hitler’s Attempt to

Exterminate the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945, Berlin, 1956). This title was offered on the assumption

that Reitlinger had succeeded in his effort. The full title of the earlier 1953 English edition of

this work did not mention Hitler.

Reitlinger conceded that the term “final solution” of the Jewish question, as employed by German

leaders in the period from the outbreak of war with Poland until war with the USSR, had

nothing to do with a liquidation of the Jews. He then considered Hitler’s order of July, 1941, for

the liquidation of the captured political commissars, and he concluded that this was

accompanied by a verbal order from Hitler for special Einsatzgruppen, to liquidate all Soviet

Jews (Ibid., p. 91.) This assumption was based on sheer deduction and has been disproved above.

Reitlinger himself cited the statement of the SS leader Karl Wolff, the chief of Himmler’s

personal staff, that Hitler knew nothing of any program to liquidate the Jews (Ibid., p. 126).

Reitlinger mentioned the indirect “proof” in Hitler’s warning in his Reichstag speech of January

30, 1939, that a new European war would mean the end of the Jewish race in Europe. He failed to

cite this statement within Hitler’s context that the catastrophe of a new war would persuade

other European countries to follow the anti-Jewish programs already adopted by Germany and

Italy. In this sense, the end of the Jewish race in Europe meant something far different from the

physical liquidation of the Jews. It meant only the elimination of their disproportionate

influence as compared to their relative population. Reitlinger was guilty of another

misinterpretation of this kind when he claimed that the SS newspaper, Schwarzes Korps,

November 24, 1938, preached the liquidation of the Jews instead of the elimination of their

influence (Ibid., p. 9).

Finally, Reitlinger claimed to have found conclusive proof of a Hitlerian liquidation policy in

the protocol of a conversation between Hitler and Hungarian Regent Horthy on April 17, 1943.

Hitler complained about the black market and subversive activities of Hungarian Jews and then

made the following comment: “They have thoroughly put an end to these conditions in Poland. If

the Jews don’t wish to work there, they will be shot. If they cannot work, at least they won’t

thrive” (Ibid., p. 472).

There never has been the slightest proof that these comments of a vexed Hitler were followed by

an actual order to shoot Jews who would not work. Reitlinger conceded that Hitler was then

seeking to persuade Horthy to release 100,000 Hungarian Jews for work in the “pursuit-plane

program” of the German air force at a time when the aerial bombardment of Germany was

rapidly increasing in intensity (Ibid., p. 478). This indicated, at most, that the idea of

compulsory labor for the Jews had taken precedence in Hitler’s thinking over the emigration

—  34  —

———————– Page 35———————–

plan. Hitler’s purpose in arguing with Horthy was obviously to increase his labor force rather

than to liquidate Jews.

The prestige and impact of Reitlinger’s work has been very great in Jewish circles. The Jewish

Year Book (London 1956, pp. 304ff.) notes that it is commonly stated that six million Jews were

“done to death by Hitler”, but that Reitlinger has suggested a possible lower estimate of

4,194,200 “missing Jews” of whom an estimate one third died of natural causes. This would reduce

the number of Jews deliberately exterminated to 2,796,000.

Some 2,500,000 of the alleged victims in Reitlinger’s lower estimate are supposed to have come

from Poland and Rumania, and yet he has stated that all figures from these countries are largely

conjectured. Moreover, the German defeat at Stalingrad prevented them from interfering

extensively with Rumanian Jews. In point of fact one could also add that all the statistics

employed by Reitlinger, even though they are more reasonable and reliable than those of any

other Jewish statistician dealing with the extermination problem on a large scale, are “largely

conjectural”, and that he failed dismally in his attempt to prove that Hitler was personally the

director of an attempt to exterminate European Jewry.

The impression of Heinrich Hoffmann, Hitler was my Friend (London, 1955, pp. 191ff.) was that

Hitler was almost exclusively preoccupied with military affairs during World War II, and that

his interest in the Jewish question was very distinctly subordinated to the German war effort.

This situation seemed to change only in April, 1945, when Hitler confronted the nightmare of

future Soviet domination of Europe. In those last days be turned his full attention again to the

activities of the Jews (Ibid., p. 227).

Hoffmann was a close personal friend who enjoyed Hitler’s extraordinary confidence. Hitler said

in August, 1939, that both he and England were bluffing about war. The war came, and Hoffmann

revealed how Hitler did everything possible to evade pressure for an invasion of Great Britain in

1940. Hoffmann was understandably plunged into gloom by the outbreak of war with the USSR on

June 22, 1941, but Hitler patiently explained to him at length why he considered the preventive

war in the East indispensable for German security. The key reason, of course, was the failure of

Hitler to achieve a compromise peace in the West (Ibid., pp. 115ff.).

Sven Hedin, Ohne Auftrag in Berlin (In Berlin without Assignment, Buenos Aires, 1949) had

frequent contacts with Hitler during the period 1933-1942. Hitler knew that the great Swedish

scientist-explorer, who was partly Jewish himself, was opposed to persecution of the Jews in any

form. Hedin’s Germany and World Peace (London, 1937) had been banned in Germany, although

the author, on the strength of Hitler’s and Göring’s friendship, had hoped to make his principal

future income for scientific purposes out of the German edition of the book. Hedin admitted that

the Germans before 1933 had understandable grievances against their small Jewish minority. The

Jews, although only .8 per cent of the population, supplied 23.07 per cent of the lawyers of

Germany and enjoyed a major share of income from German trade and industry. Nevertheless, he

believed that Germany would have “overlooked” the Jewish question had it not been for her

defeat in 1918 and her subsequent misfortunes. It is easy to see why Hedin’s adoption of the

“scapegoat” theory to explain the National Socialist anti-Jewish policy did not please the

National Socialists.

In Berlin without Assignment, Hedin gave expression to the fear that people and events of the

Hitler era would be depicted solely in the perspective and interests of a later period for years

and years to come. The facts have borne out this prediction. The attitude of the West has

remained identical with that of the USSR so far as National Socialism is concerned. Despite the

Cold War and sharp disagreements on other subjects, there is complete unanimity about what

happened in Germany down through 1945 and in hostility to National Socialism.

According to Hedin, Hitler did not wish to go to war with the West. The war forced upon Hitler

by the West ended in a grandiose victory for Communism and in a crushing political and moral

defeat for everyone else. Hence, an immense propaganda was maintained in the West after 1945

to keep people convinced that German National Socialism was infinitely worse than Russian

Communism, even after Russian gains in the war.

It was rightly feared that Western policy prior to 1945 would appear as nonsense without such a

thesis. Hence, an effort was launched to organize Western resistance to Communism as “the much

—  35  —

———————– Page 36———————–

lesser evil”. But the role of the USSR was crucial in the defeat of National Socialism, and people

in the West wondered how this later intense and alarmed resistance to “the much lesser evil of

Communism” could be either legitimate or justifiable. The West could have presented a far more

formidable and convincing moral resistance to Communism by admitting past mistakes in regard

to the war and the preceding diplomacy.

Hedin’s book shares the impression of Hitler’s closest Austrian friend, August Kubizek, The

Young Hitler I Knew (Boston, 1955, pp. 291ff.) that Hitler was sick of the war by 1940, and he

wished either to retire or to concentrate on the completion of some internal reconstruction projects.

He certainly did not impress either of them as a human fiend who believed that he was about to

launch his truly major program of liquidating world Jewry. Hedin described Hitler as “a powerful

and harmonious personality.”

Hedin noted Hitler’s wishful thinking in 1940 about Stalin, and his vain hope that the Soviet

dictator would abandon ambitious plans for an ultimate world revolution in favor of a nationalist

program for Russia. Later, in a letter to Hedin on October 30, 1942, Hitler attempted to

rationalize a desperate situation by finding a new purpose in destroying Communism. He

reminded Hedin that he had hoped for a compromise settlement with Poland in 1939. In

accepting Hedin’s thesis in Amerika in Kampf der Kontinente (America in the Struggle of the

Continents, Leipzig, 1942) that Roosevelt was the major factor in producing war in 1939, he added

that, perhaps, the American President had done the world a favor, after all, by forcing Germany

to deal with the Communist threat before it was too late (Auftrag, pp. 281ff.).

Walter Schellenberg, The Schellenberg Memoirs (London, 1956, pp. 394ff.) revealed that Hitler

learned almost immediately that Roosevelt and Churchill had agreed at Teheran in 1943 to

permit most of Eastern Germany to be assigned to a Communist-controlled Poland in the event of

Allied victory. The spy, Moyzisch, had obtained the complete record of the Teheran conference

from British diplomatic sources in Turkey. Hitler became more convinced than ever that

Communism would eventually win its struggle for the world if Germany went down. Schellenberg

has testified that the future of the German people was the closest thing to Hitler’s heart until

the end, but Hitler’s final despair became very great.

Achim Besgen, Der Stille Befehl (The Unspoken Command, Munich, 1960, pp. 229ff.) claimed

without the slightest proof that Hitler in his despair in April, 1945, ordered a last-minute

extermination of the Jews to accompany the Draconian measures which he was seeking to enforce

on his own German people. This is the latest date offered by any author for a deliberate German

effort to liquidate the Jews.

Besgen and Schellenberg agreed in their favorable opinion of genial Felix Kersten, the Baltic

German physician who attended Himmler. Schellenberg recognized and approved Kersten as a

moderating influence on Himmler. Besgen has celebrated Kersten as the great humanitarian who

per suaded Himmler not to insist on the transportation of Finnish Jews for compulsory labor in

Germany. Indeed, Himmler also desisted from his earlier efforts to persuade Bulgaria to send

Jewish laborers to Germany. A few Danish Jews were forced to come to Germany, but most of them

went to Sweden to evade German measures.

This pressure on countries allied or associated with Germany always had the same basis: the

German Reich claimed, after the war became exceedingly critical, that the Jewish population

throughout German-occupied Europe was a hostile force. The United States and Canada had

begun to intern both Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese ex’traction in internment camps

before this became a German policy toward many German and other European Jews. There was no

tangible evidence of disloyalty, not to mention sabotage or espionage, among these people of

Japanese extraction.

The Germans at least had a somewhat more plausible basis to press for the internment of Jews.

Reference has been made to Chaim Weizmann’s early declaration of war against Germany on

behalf of World Jewry (Weizmann was the principal Zionist leader). The following version of

his statement, which was first announced in the London Times on September 5, 1939, appeared in

the London Jewish Chronicle, September 8, 1939:

I wish to confirm in the most explicit manner, the declaration which I and my colleagues made

during the last months, and especially in the last week: that the Jews “stand by Great Britain

—  36  —

———————– Page 37———————–

and will fight on the side of the democracies.” Our urgent desire is to give effect to these

declarations. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British

action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the co-ordinating

direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate

arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.

Weizmann had effectively declared all Jews within the German sphere to be subjects of an enemy

power, and to be willing agents in the prosecution of the war against Germany. He had obviously

permitted his zeal for destroying Hitler and the German Reich to triumph over his solicitude for

the Jews in Hitler’s domain.

Felix Kersten, Memoirs, 1940-1945 (London, 1956, pp. 119ff.) joined those who charged, on the

basis of the German internment policy, that there was a deliberate German program to

exterminate the Jews. But he did not attempt to implicate Hitler, and he was also emphatic in

stating that Heinrich Himmler did not advocate the liquidation of the Jews but favored their

emigration overseas. Yet there had to be an author of the alleged extermination policy. Kersten’s

fantastic attempt to provide an answer to this problem shattered the credibility of his narrative.

Kersten was born in Estonia in 1898, and he fought for the Finns against the Bolsheviks in 1918.

He was a typically cosmopolitan Baltic German, and in 1920 be became a Finnish citizen. Later

he studied medicine in Berlin and lived in various parts of Europe. His services as a physician

were chiefly valued because of his skill as a chiropractor. He was being employed by the Dutch

royal household in March, 1939, when a private German businessman suggested that he examine

Himmler, who was plagued by stomach and muscular ailments. Kersten was reluctant to devote

himself exclusively to Himmler because of his Dutch practice, but he agreed to do so after the

German occupation of the Netherlands in May, 1940. He was convinced before the end of 1942 that

Germany was heading for defeat in World War II. He informed Himmler that he was

establishing permanent residence in Sweden, and that his presence in Germany would be limited

to periodic visits.

It is not surprising, in view of the flow of world opinion, that Kersten, a notorious opportunist,

implied after 1945 that there had been this campaign to exterminate the Jews. Any “proof” he

might offer would be limited to his own private recording of alleged conversations with

Himmler. Kersten gave the impression that he could say whatever he wished to Himmler about

German policy. Himmler on many occasions reputedly said that he recognized Kersten as an

enemy of National Socialism who desired the defeat of Germany in the war. Apparently, this

did not trouble their professional relationship.

The German-Jewish historian, George Hallgarten, published his recollections of young Himmler

in Germania Judaica (Cologne, April 1960). Hallgarten and Himmler were close acquaintances

while both were students at Munich. Hallgarten found Himmler to be a tolerant and broad-

minded person “comparatively free from anti-Semitism.” This might explain why it was

actually possible for Kersten to say what be pleased to Himmler about the Jews, Germany, and

the war. Himmler was, apparently, willing to tolerate Kersten because he believed, and rightly

so, that the Baltic German physician was not sufficiently heroic to use his position to aid the

enemies of the German Reich in the prosecution of the war.

Some of the information supplied by Kersten is of passing interest. For instance, be confirmed the

fact that the Belsen concentration camp achieved the unfortunate reputation of being a “death

camp” solely because of the devastating typhus epidemic which erupted there in March, 1945,

toward the end of an unnecessarily prolonged war. It was this same epidemic and its results

which had greatly depressed Oswald Pohl.

The crucial point in Kersten’s entire book is the claim that Himmler told him on November 10,

1942, that Joseph Goebbels was the driving force behind an alleged campaign of Jewish

extermination. But Roger Manvell and Heinrich Fraenkel, Dr. Goebbels, His Life and Death

(N.Y., 1960, pp. 187ff.) have successfully defended the thesis that Goebbels had little to do with

any specific phase of German policy after the outbreak of World War II. It was not difficult for

them to sustain their point. Goebbels was the enthusiastic advocate of a “Free-Russia” movement

as early as the summer of 1941, but his recommendations were summarily rejected. The German

—  37  —

———————– Page 38———————–

Government favored a wait-and-see policy pending a military decision, and the plans of Alfred

Rosenberg for self-determination to the Soviet subject nationalities were also rejected.

Goebbels had done what he could to maintain normalcy in the cultural sphere of German life until

the outbreak of the Russian war. Manvell and Fraenkel note that in 1940-1941 there were 355

state theatres, 175 independent theatres, and 142 open-air theatres in operation in Germany, “an

incredibly large number even for the country which supported the largest number of theatres in

Europe” (Ibid., p. 182). Goebbels was opposed to World War II from the start, and he deplored the

continuation of the war. Nevertheless, when war with Russia commenced, he made

recommendations for greater military preparations, but his advice in a specific sphere of public

policy was, as usual, rejected. Goebbels hoped to retire after the war to write a monumental

multi-volume biography of Hitler and a history of Germany since 1900.

The authors cite a memorandum written by Goebbels as late as March 7, 1942, in favor of the

Madagascar plan as the “final solution” of the Jewish question (Ibid., p. 195). In the meantime,

he approved having the Jews “concentrated in the, East” as a measure to guarantee German war-

time security. He concluded that “there can be no peace in Europe until every Jew has been

eliminated from the continent.” Later Goebbels memoranda comment on the transportation of the

Jews to the East and emphasize the importance of compulsory labor in that area. The authors, in

considering these memoranda, flatly refuse to imply, even remotely, that Goebbels was a force in

initiating wartime measures against the Jews. His earlier initiative in peacetime measures, such

as the November, 1938, demonstrations calculated to accelerate emigration of the Jews, belonged

to a by-gone era.

It must be conceded that this allegedly definitive work on Goebbels contains more than its share

of colossal errors. The authors claim there “can be no doubt at all” that Göring and Goebbels were

behind the 1933 Reichstag fire, although Fritz Tobias, “Stehen Sie auf, Van der Lubbe!” (Stand

Up, Van der Lvbbe, Der Spiegel, Oct. 23, 1959 ff.) has proved conclusively that none of the

National Socialists had any connection with the Reichstag fire. Equally wrong is the contention

that Herschel Grynszpan, the Jewish assassin of Ernst von Rath, was executed during World War

II at the behest of Goebbels. Grynszpan is at present living in Paris (Ibid., pp. 115, 149).

In short, there is no proof that Hitler knew anything of a plan to exterminate the Jews. Himmler

favored Jewish emigration rather than a program of extermination. Goebbels, who also favored

emigration, was in any case unable to exert a determining influence on the pursuit of public

policies during wartime. Martin Bormann, who succeeded Rudolf Höss as Hitler’s personal deputy

and chief of the NSDAP chancellery, was notoriously dependent on Hitler for all initiative in

larger questions. Important private confirmation on this point from Martin Bormann himself is

contained in The Bormann Letters: Private Correspondence between Martin Bormann and his Wife

from January 1943 to April 1945 (London, 1954, pp. 26ff.).

Alan Bullock, Hitler, a Study in Tyranny (N.Y., 1952, pp. 558ff.) failed to uncover any important

information on Hitler’s wartime policy toward the Jews, and, indeed, he was unable to transcend

the moral and mental attitudes of the prosecution at the Nuremberg trials. Hugh Trevor-Roper,

“Hitlers Kriegsziele” (Hitler’s War Arms, in Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 1960/2) has

pointed out that Bullock’s work has been crippled by an underestimation of Hitler’s intelligence

and a lack of understanding for his ideas.

20. Hans Grimm’s Fundamental Analysis of Hitler, National Socialism, and the Jewish Problem

Hans Grimm, the proudly independent and distinguished German writer who died in 1959, has

written far and away the best book on Hitler’s ideas and program to date: Warum — Woher —

Aber Wohin? (Why — From-What — To What Purpose?, Lippoldsberg, 1954). It would seem both

fair and fitting in this lengthy treatment of dreadful charges brought against Germany to present

the essence of his thought on the subject of Hitler, Germany, and the Jews. Grimm delayed his

work for many years after Hitler’s death until he was convinced, through sustained

contemplation and greater perspective, that he had arrived at a detached judgment of the

deceased German leader. Above all, he came to recognize in Hitler the man who had created the

miracle of the truly German national community. The vestigial class conflicts of the feudal

period, and the more modern ones exploited by Karl Marx, were largely overcome.

—  38  —

———————– Page 39———————–

Grimm met Hitler for the first time in 1928. He recognized that Hitler had an abiding faith in

the crucial importance of a lasting Anglo-German agreement. Hitler in those days was still

looking for the man to lead Germany from the platform in the movement of which be himself was

the prophet.

Grimm maintained an independent attitude toward Hitler and his work at all times. He voted

“No” in the 1934 election to combine the German presidential and chancellor offices on the

grounds that Hitler did not deserve to have so much power concentrated in his own hands. Hitler

by that time had decided that he would have to lead Germany in her hour of supreme crisis,

because the more able and highly-qualified personality for whom he had waited had failed to

appear. Grimm’s distrust of Hitler remained undiminished until the end of World War II. He

was, nevertheless, disgusted by the vile details of Sftauffenberg’s July 20, 1944, assassination

attempt against Hitler in which the would-be assassin, a German officer, merely placed a bomb

certain to kill other people as part of an effort to save his own life.

Grimm was opposed to Hitler’s anti-Jewish policy, but he admitted that throughout the world

he himself had encountered the proverbial disloyalty toward Germany of the so-called German

Jews (Ibid., pp. 53-54). Hitler had told Grimm in 1929 that the permanent disintegration of

Germany would be a disaster for western civilization, and that he was convinced that the

salvation of Europe and America depended upon the salvation of Germany. Hitler’s basic pro-

American attitude was also confirmed by Ernst Hanfstaengl, Unheard Witness (Philadelphia,

1957, pp. 183ff.). Hanfstaengl noted that Hitler had little difficulty on the on the basis of the

facts in making his charges stick about the ruthless exploitation of Weimar Germany by the Jews.

Indeed, the Jewish economic position in Germany was far more impressive and extensive than in

either Great Britain or the United States (Ibid., pp. 35ff.).

Grimm noted that Hitler and Goebbels, whom he also saw frequently after 1931, favored a

separate state for the Jews. This indicated that their thinking on the Jewish question was not

limited to the merely negative factor of ridding Germany of her Jews, but that it followed a

positive approach along the lines of modern Zionism.

Hitler saw in Jewry a conscious obstacle to the creation of a German national community. Grimm

noted that Hitler was striving for a truly democratic German community without the

conventional parliamentary basis which had served Germany so poorly in the past. The

tremendous enthusiasm which Hitler aroused among the German people in 1933 lasted well into

the war period, until it was recognized that Germany’s foes, after all, would be able to deny and

cancel the hopes and dreams of the entire German people. Grimm himself did not fully recognize

the tragedy of this situation until after Hitler’s death. Grimm noted that in 1945 he encountered

many healthy former inmates of those German concentration camps which had been pictured by

an unbridled atrocity propaganda as unexceptionable dens of hell and death.

Grimm denounced the demonstrations against the Jews which were organized by Goebbels on

November 10, 1938, but be rightly noted that they were no worse than the treatment of Germans

abroad during World War I, including the United States. That this observation about the

American treatment of Germans during World War I was really an understatement has been

amply proved by H. C. Peterson and G. C. Fite in their Opponents of War, 1917-1918 (Madison,

Wisconsin, 1957) which deals in detail with what happened in the United States. In this

context, and in view of the American record of mistreating Germans in 1917-1918, it was extremely

ironical when President Roosevelt told an American press conference on November 14, 1938, that

he could scarcely believe such things as the November, 1938, demonstrations in Germany could

happen in a civilized country. The American Zionist leader, Samuel Untermeyer, had been

conducting his boycott and holy war against the Germans for more than five years by that time.

Hitler was personally shocked by the November, 1938, measures launched by Goebbels and even

declared that these events could have ruined National Socialist Germany permanently. The

British diplomat, Ogilvie-Forbes, reported his conviction to London from Berlin that nothing of

the sort would ever be attempted again.

Grimm himself concluded after World War II that the old Jewish nation, which had been

landless for 2,000 years, was exploiting the confusion and uncertainty of the younger modern

nations in an attempt to dominate the world. The creation of a Zionist Jewish state would be of no

—  39  —

———————– Page 40———————–

adequate service in averting this danger unless it was carried through on a comprehensive scale

which would enable it to embrace most of the Jews of the world.

Osward Pirow, the South African Defense Minister, approached Hitler in November, 1938, with

a plan for the creation of a fund to solve the problem of Jewish emigration from Europe. The entire

scheme was to be carried through on an international basis with 2.5 billion dollars provided from

German-Jewish and other Jewish sources. The proposals were greeted with approval by Hitler

but were blocked in London. The same was true of Pirow’s proposal for an agreement between

Germany and the West which would give Germany a free hand in Eastern Europe.

In May, 1939, an elaborate, conspiracy to assassinate Hitler was organized and financed by the

English Jew, George Russel Strauss, at a time when England and Germany were at peace. The

various would-be assassins who tried to win the reward money from Strauss were unsuccessful, but

their efforts continued long after England and Germany were at war. Grimm emphasized that

these efforts had no influence on Hitler’s policy toward the Jews, although Hitler knew that

conspiracies of this kind had been organized against him from abroad.

Grimm correctly called, attention to the fact that the prosecution at the Nuremberg trials was

absolutely determined to prevent any introduction of factual material which would expose the

gigantic fraud to the effect that six million Jews had been exterminated by the National

Socialist government during the war. The defense attorneys were not allowed to question the

allegation by means of cross-examination, although, despite this arbitrary limitation, they did

make several impressive attempts to do so through flank attacks. None of the numerous Jewish

acquaintances of Grimm in Germany had been liquidated; on the contrary, all had survived the

war. But economic and political pressures were exerted by occupation authorities in Germany

after 1945 to prevent a free investigation of these atrocity charges by reputable scholars and they

have been continued by the Adenauer government at Bonn.

Hitler hoped to create an effective German dam against the inroads from the East in line with

the traditions of European history. He hoped to create a comradely international league of

nationalisms among the nations of Europe. Jewish spokesmen, such as Untermeyer and Weizmann,

took the same adamant position as the Soviet Marxists in seeking to undermine all such ideas.

The September 30, 1938, Anglo-German friendship agreement seemed to offer great hope that

Europe was facing a better future, but, within a few days, the pressure from the “anti-Munichers”

within the Tory Party took the initiative for friendship with Germany out of Chamberlain’s

hands. Grimm believed that Hitler had fully and properly recognized the dangers of this

situation in his speech criticizing the anti-Munich English group at Saarbrücken on October 9,

1938. The English succeeded in stirring up the Poles in 1939, and the Germans of Poland had

suffered day and night for many months before September, 1939, what the Jews of Germany had

experienced on the single date of November 10, 1938. There was little sympathy in the

international press for these Gennans of Poland. They were not Jews.

Grimm recognized Hitler’s interest in adequate economic access to the raw materials of Eastern

Europe, and he was convinced that Hitler would have been content under normal conditions to

satisfy Germany’s need within the context of the German-Russian non-aggression pact of August

23, 1939. When Hitler said at the Nuremberg Party Congress, in 1936, that Germany would swim

in plenty if she had the resources of the Urals, the German leader was not saying that Germany

should have the Urals or intended to take them. All he meant was that the Germans could do a

better job of exploiting natural resources than was true of the Soviet masters of Russia at that

time. Grimm believed that the months from November, 1938, until September, 1939, were the

most difficult personal period for Hitler prior to 1944. His desire for a rational reorganization of

Europe was threatened by the machinations of British fanatics on the balance of power tradition.

World War II came, and with it the spread of Communism and suffering for all Europe. Grimm,

after 1945, discussed the fate of Jewry during World War II with experts on statistics and

population throughout Germany, and also with numerous Germans who had personal experiences

with the German concentration camp system. Grimm noted the general consensus, based on Red

Cross estimates, that the number of Jewish and all other minority victims of German policies

throughout World War II could not have exceeded 350,000, and many of these died from allied

—  40  —

———————– Page 41———————–

bombings and natural causes (Ibid., p. 290). This would leave scant room for the alleged mass

operation of the gas chambers.

Grimm was quick to deplore the mistreatment of any Jews wherever they occurred, but he did not

believe for one moment that Jewish misfortune surpassed German suffering during a war which

ended in unprecedented disaster for Germany and unparalleled triumph for the Jews.

Nevertheless, Grimm concluded that there would continue to be a Jewish question as well as a

German question until a homeland could be created for most of the Jews (Ibid., p. 561). Grimm’s

book constituted a courageous and conscientious attempt to defend his country from undeserved

slander and defamation.

21. The Factual Appraisal of the Conditions in the German Wartime Concentration Camps by the

International Committee of the Red Cross

A key role in relation to the Jewish question in Europe during World War H was played by the

International Committee of the Red Cross, which consisted largely of relatively detached Swiss

nationals, although, as might be expected, sentiment became more critical of Germany when the

German military defeats continued to mount following Stalingrad. At the 17th International Red

Cross Conference at Stockholm in 1947 final arrangements were made for a definitive report to

appear the next year: Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities

during the Second World War (3 vols., Geneva, 1948). This comprehensive survey both

supplemented and incorporated the findings from two previous key works: Documents sur

L’activité du CICR en faveur des civils detenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne,

1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second

World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the

opening pages of the first of the 1948 volumes that their motto had been strict political

neutrality, and service to all. The ICRC was contrasted with the national societies of the Red

Cross with their primary aims of aiding their own peoples. The neutrality of the ICRC was seen

to he typified by its two principal wartime leaders, Max Huber and Carl J. Burckhardt. This

neutral source has been selected here to conclude the testimony on the genocide question.

The ICRC considered that its greatest single wartime triumph consisted in the successful

application of the 1929 Geneva military convention to obtain access to civilian internees in the

various parts of Central and Western Europe. The ICRC, however, was unable to obtain any access

to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the 1929 convention. The millions of civilian and

military internees in the USSR were cut off from any international contact or supervision

whatever. This was especially deplorable, since enough was known to assert that by far the

worst conditions for internees of both types existed in the USSR.

ICRC contacts with German internment camps in wartime began on September 23, 1939, with a

visit to Germany’s major PW camp for captured Polish soldiers. The ICRC, after March, 1942, and

the first reports on German mass-internment policies directed toward the Jews, became concerned

that previously satisfactory conditions in German civilian internment camps might be affected.

The German Red Cross was requested to take action, but they candidly reported to the ICRC on

April 29, 1942, that the German Government was not being sufficiently cooperative in providing

necessary information. The German Government took the position that its internment policy

“related to the security of the detaining state” (Report, vol. 1, p. 613). The ICRC did not accept

this position as a basis for excluding supervisory authority, and finally, by the latter part of

1942, it was able to secure important concessions from Germany.

The German Government agreed to permit the ICRC to supervise the shipment of food parcels to

the camps for all cases which did not involve German nationals. The ICRC soon established

contact with the commandants and personnel of the camps and launched their food relief

program, which functioned until the last chaotic days of the war in 1945. Letters of thanks for

packages were soon pouring in from Jewish internees, and it was also possible to make unlimited

anonymous food shipments to the camps.

As early as October 2, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending

collapse of the German transportation system due to the Allied bombing campaign. The ICRC

considered that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.

—  41  —

———————– Page 42———————–

At last, on February 1, 1945, the German Government agreed to permit Canadian PW’s to drive

white supply trucks to the various concentration camps. The ICRC set up one special distribution

center at the Berlin Jewish Hospital and another at Basel. However, this improvised food

system did not work well, and many of the white food trucks were destroyed by Allied aerial

attacks. The ICRC role became so important in the last phase of the war that it was actually the

ICRC representatives who hoisted the white flags of surrender at Dachau and Mauthausen

during the final days of the war.

The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt

(Terezin) up to the time of their last visits there in April, 1945. This large Jewish community,

which had been concentrated under German auspices, enjoyed complete autonomy in communal life

under a Jewish administration. The Jewish Council of Elders repeatedly informed the ICRC

representatives that they were enjoying surprisingly favorable conditions when one considered

that Germany was going down to defeat during a war in which World Jewry had been the first to

call for her destruction.

The ICRC also had special praise for the Vittel camp in German-occupied France. This camp

contained thousands of Polish Jews whose only claim to special consideration was that they had

received visas from American consular authorities. They were treated by the German authorities

in every respect as full-fledged American citizens.

The ICRC had some guarded comments to make about the situation of Hungarian Jews, many of

whom were deported. to Poland by the Germans in 1944 after the German occupation of Hungary.

The ICRC believed, for instance, that the “ardent” demonstrations of Hungarian Jews against the

German occupation were unwise.

The ICRC had special praise for the mild regime of Ion Antonescu of Rumania toward the Jews,

and they were able to give special relief help to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the moment of the

Soviet occupation. This enabled the Rumanian Jews to enjoy far better conditions than average

Rumanians during the late months of the war. This aid ceased with the Soviet occupation, and

the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to

Russia” (Report, vol. 2, p. 62).

It should be noted that the ICRC received voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the

period of the Soviet occupation. By that time many of the internees had been evacuated

westward by the Germans. The efforts of the ICRC to extend aid to the internees left at

Auschwitz under the Soviet occupation were futile. It was possible, however, at least to a limited

extent, for ICRC representatives to supervise the evacuation of Auschwitz by way of Moravia and

Bohemia. It was also possible to continue sending food parcels for former Auschwitz inmates to

such places as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.

The ICRC complained bitterly that their vast relief operations for civilian Jewish internees in

camps were hampered by the tight Allied blockade of Fortress Europe. Most of their purchases of

relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary, and Slovakia. It was also in the interest of the

interned Jews that the ICRC on March 15, 1944, protested against “the barbarous aerial warfare

of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). The period of the 1899 and 1907 Hague conventions

could only be considered a golden age by comparison.

It is important to note in finishing with these detailed and comprehensive ICRC reports that

none of the International Red Cross representatives at the camps or else where in Axis-occupied

Europe found any evidence what ever that a deliberate policy of extermination was being

conducted by Germany against the Jews. The ICRC did emphasize that there was general chaos in

Germany during the final months of the war at a time when most of the Jewish doctors from the

camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front. These doctors were far from the camp

areas when the dreaded typhus epidemics of 1945 struck (Report, vol. 1, pp. 204ff.).

The ICRC worked in close cooperation throughout the war with Vatican representatives, and,

like the Vatican, found itself unable, after the event, to engage in the irresponsible charges of

genocide which had become the order of the day.

Nothing is more striking or important relative to the work of the International Red Cross in

relation to the concentration camps than the statistics it presented on the loss of life in the civil

population during the Second World War:

—  42  —

———————– Page 43———————–

These figures present the appalling estimate of 17,850,000 who lost their lives for reasons other

than persecution, while only 300,000 of all persecuted groups, many of whom were not Jews, died

from all causes during the war. This figure of 300,000 stands out in marked contrast with the

5,012,000 Jews estimated by the Jewish joint Distribution Committee to have lost their lives

during the war, mainly through extermination by National Socialists.

One of the most bewildered Germans after the war was Legation Counsellor Eberhard von

Thadden, who had been delegated the double responsibility by the German Foreign Office of

working on the Jewish question with the ICRC and with Adolf Eichmann. In April, 1943, he

discussed with Eichmann the rumors circulating abroad that Jews were being wantonly

exterminated by the German authorities. Eichmann insisted that the very idea of extermination

was absurd. Germany needed all possible labor in a struggle for her very existence.

Thadden questioned the wisdom of the internment policy. Eichmann admitted that available

transportation facilities were needed to furnish both the fronts and the homeland, but he argued

that it had become necessary to concentrate Jew from the occupied territories in the East and in

German camps to secure Jewish labor effectively and to avert unrest and subversion in the occupied

countries. Any of the occupied countries might become a front-line area within a relatively short

period of time.

Eichmann insisted that the family camps for the Jews in the East, along the lines of

Theresienstadt, were far more acceptable to the Jews than the separations which the splitting up

of families would entail. Eichmann admitted a case to Thaden in 1944 in which a Jew was killed

in Slovakia while on transport from Hungary to Poland, but he insisted that such an event was

extremely exceptional. He reminded Thadden again that the Jews were solely in camps so that

their working power could be utilized and espionage could be prevented. He noted that Germany

had not employed these extreme measures in the early years of the war, but only when it became

evident that her very existence was at stake. Eichmann also reminded Thadden that foreign Jews

who were being allowed to leave Europe directly from the camps were not charging Germany

with the atrocities which were irresponsibly rumored from abroad. In short, Thadden, who had

personally made numerous visits to the various concentration camps, was thoroughly convinced

that Eichmann was right and that the foreign rumors of genocide in circulation were incorrect.

Eberhard von Thadden’s only comment from his prison cell on June 11, 1946, after having heard

the full scope of the Nuremberg Trial propaganda, was that, if Eichmann had lied, he would

have to have been a “very skillful” liar indeed. The world has not yet sufficiently pondered the

question about who has lied and why. Yet it is a statistical fact that, for every fraudulent

affidavit or statement claiming a death camp or a gas chamber, there are at least twenty which

deny the very existence of such camps and gas chambers. It is only the published evidence which

has presented a lop-sided picture in support of the genocide myth.

22. Conclusion

The unavoidable conclusion about the wartime German treatment of European Jewry is that we

have encountered a deliberate defamation and falsification conspiracy on an unprecedented scale.

The internment of European Jews, like that of the Japanese in the United States and Canada, was

carried out for security reasons. It was pointed out earlier that there was no such thorough

internment of the Jews by Germans as took place in the case of the Japanese in America. Not over

2,000,000 Jews were ever interned by the Germans in concentration camps and it is unlikely that

the figure was greater than 1,500,000. There is not the slightest intention here to argue that such

internment was either necessary or desirable in any of these cases. Our treatment here has been

solely concerned with the utterly monstrous and unfounded charge that internment was used by

the Germans as a veil behind which they successfully slaughtered no less than six million

European Jews. There has never been even the slightest conclusive proof for such a campaign of

promiscuous slaughter on the part of Germany, and, in the meantime, all reliable evidence

continues to suggest with increasing volume and impact that this genocide legend is a deliberate

and brazen falsification.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

—  43  —

———————– Page 44———————–

The Myth of the Six Million was published anonymously in 1969, by THE NOONTIDE PRESS,

P.O. Box 2719, Newport Beach, California 92659, USA. The book is for the moment out of print. It

has been digitalized and displayed on the website of the Institute for Historical Review,

<http://www.ihr.org&gt; and reproduced on AAARGH in May 2001. It is now a common knowledge

that the author of this pioneering little book (105 p.) was David Hoggan, a scholar in his own

right.

AAARGH edition on line

<aaarghinternational@hotmail.com>

—  44  —

17 April, 2013

Paper Gold & Silver Plunge, Not Real Hard Metal

All of you want to read the news at http://silverdoctors.com/.

Real hard metal is down but not that much as demand was still high just before collapse.

Mines are closing, banksters hoard gold from Cyprus, some say gold is extracted from Earth for other civilisations (does it explain why coffers and vaults – say Fort Knox – are empty?), so that LESS gold but yet it goes DOWN (on the manipulated financial markets).

Big things are happening and to cover them many other things happen (in the media at least) : Thatcher’s funerals, bombing in Boston, poison sent to US senator, North Korea ‘menacing the world peace’, looting of Cyprus, governments reshuffling, ‘flu’ pandemic (yeah, many are coughing), pope sepping donw, new jesuit pope, etc

Anybody’s looking at the Sky?

7 April, 2013

From Chemtrails to Pseudo-Life: The Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology

From Chemtrails to Pseudo-Life: The Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology

As the natural world dies around us, what will take its place? Planetary engineering includes bioremediation measures to bring us genetically engineered trees and crops. And what of humans themselves? How are we being transformed from the inside out?

People around the world are observing aerosol spraying (also called “chemtrails”) and strange man-made clouds. White skies filter sunlight as trees around the country sicken and die. Soil and water tests high for heavy metals and artificial fibers fall on us from the sky.

Is aerosol spraying only about experimenting with weather? What do the self-replicating fibers found in Morgellons patients signify? Why are engineered materials being found in airborne environmental samples?

All this suggests a planetary engineering program that is affecting and targeting all living things. Synthetic biology is science’s most exciting new frontier, combining genetics, robotics and nanotechnology with artificial intelligence, hybridizing natural forms and engineering tissues beyond our wildest dreams. The technology explosion is rocketing, and artificial intelligence will surpass our own capabilities.

How will our world be organized then? Will we turn ourselves over to machines? Or will we have become technological hybrids ourselves?

Learn more at: http://www.AboutTheSky.com

Find the DVD and more at: http://www.AvatarProducts.com

PS: Unlike most content on this YouTube channel, livemusic did not shoot or edit this video. Please spread the link widely! It’s time to have this discussion on a mainstream level. Thank you.